Crush Liberalism

Why NEVER to trust liberals with national security

David Limbaugh has a great column about why not to trust liberals on matters of national security. An excerpt:

————–>

The Washington Post and Los Angeles Daily News editorial endorsements of Kerry, alone, demonstrate why liberals must never be entrusted with our national security.

Both papers, amazingly, concede that the War on Terror and national security are the most important issues the next president will have to confront. Both admit that Kerry has been wishy-washy on these subjects. But both, ultimately, conclude that Kerry is the better choice, essentially, because he promises to do better. In other words, we should base our decision on some of Kerry’s words, not his other words or actions to the contrary.

Precisely what does Kerry promise to do so differently from President Bush? To restore unity at home and heal our alliances abroad, of course. Now don’t you feel better?

Note the liberal disconnect here. These papers have the presence of mind to recognize that our national security is the paramount issue. But they have the profound obscurity of mind to believe that sweet-talking corrupt “allies” is the panacea for the War on Terror.

————–>

The column can be found here:

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/davidlimbaugh/dl20041026.shtml

October 26, 2004 - Posted by crushliberalism | Uncategorized