Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

GOP: porkmasters

You may have seen lately where the GOP was going to cut the rate of growth of Medicaid, to encourage states to slim it down and weed out fraud. Naturally, the left whined about the “cuts”, which weren’t even cuts in amounts spent…just the rate of growth. About the only thing the left ever wanted to “cut” was defense spending.

Well, the whining (and media coverage by the Dems’ trusty allies in the MSM) worked. Republicans ran like scared dogs, and backed off.

So why can’t they seem to cut the government’s massively bloated size (and budget)? Well, because they’re now intoxicated with power, and will spend billions on pork to keep it. Funny, since I thought the GOP was supposed to be the party of limited government and fiscal discipline! Geez, they’re spending like drunken sailors at a Tijuana whorehouse!

Little wonder why I’m a Libertarian, huh?

Cal Thomas has a great column on the GOP betraying their vows in 1994 to restore fiscal sanity to D.C. Among such “federal spending priorities”:

$100,000 of our tax dollars going to the Tiger Woods Foundation;
$75,000 for the sports halls of fame in Syracuse, N.Y;
$450,000 for “educational outreach”, i.e. the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, N.Y.

These are federal responsibilities? Please read Cal’s column (it’s pretty short) to get the full appreciation on how the GOP has flushed the Contract with America (and six consecutive Congressional, along with two presidential, victories) down the toilet.

Advertisement

March 24, 2005 - Posted by | Uncategorized

2 Comments »

  1. I’m not happy either by all the pork going on in D.C., but it’s a whole lot less spending than would be going on is the Dems were control of the Congress. Also, If the Dems were in control tax rates would be heading towrds the levels of Norway and Finland and we would be constantly attacked by terrorists because we wouldn’t have any military to speak of.

    Who else are conservatives going to vote for. The Libertarians are not a national party that could play against the big two.

    Better the Republican you know than the Liberal Dem you don’t.

    Comment by Anonymous | March 24, 2005

  2. Alas, you are correct. It’s kinda like when I see black “leaders” say that they’re mad that Dems take them for granted. Well what are they gonna do…vote Republican? Nope. Ergo, the Dems will continue to take them for granted.

    Libertarians would have a better chance of getting more Americans on board with them, if not for two main things: (1) on ballots, Libertarian candidates have their party listed as LIB, which most folks think means “Liberal”…and we all know that liberals don’t get elected by being openly liberal; and (2) Libertarians think we should decriminalize drug usage, and that loses a lot of people…irrespective of the merits of the arguments.

    Comment by Jonathan | March 24, 2005


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers