Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Vets don’t like Shrillary? Who knew?

From Hot Air:

I don’t get it. Don’t they know she’s a “hawk”?
vets.png
Naturally this will be spun as evidence of the military being uncomfortable with a woman as CINC, not as a reflection of their feelings about Hillary personally. That’s okay. The left has already begun inching away from the “chickenhawk” implication that soldiers know best when it comes to all things war. Their skepticism about the Glacier will help fuel that Strange New Respect for civilian opinion. As for the GOP, I don’t know who comes off better: Rudy, who has the distinction of being the only candidate from either party with a lower disapproval rating among vets than among the general public, or Fred, who gets the biggest bump in approval rating among vets vis-a-vis civilians.

Considering that her and her hubby spent eight years in the Oral…er, Oval…office with a well-known reputation for disdain for the military, and considering their disdain was shared by their partner-in-crime Al Gore as he sent ambulance chasers to FL in 2000 to disqualify military votes from overseas, this should come as a surprise to no one.

August 24, 2007 - Posted by crushliberalism | Hillary, Rudy, polls

2 Comments »

  1. Any normal person knows a Chicken Hawk is a slang term for pedophile, and we chickenhawks will attack the helpless at will. That is what makes us even more pitiful than a Turkey Vulture. At least the Turkey Vulture cleans up the mess we Chicken Hawks leave behind, before we get caught in a Dateline NBC sting operation, sent to prison, and get cornholed by felons who take offense to our perversions.

    Boy, I sure hope my superiors (and the network administrator) here at Peterson AFB don’t find out how I spend company time trolling blogs and downloading kiddie p0rn on government computers!

    Comment by Pike Peak | August 24, 2007

  2. Who’d athunk that such a hawk would draw such disdain from military veterans? Could it just be reciprocity?

    When that ‘hawk’ is placed under intense scrutiny all the feathers appear to be those belonging to a mocking bird – not a real hawk.

    Comment by Old Soldier | August 25, 2007


Leave a comment

« Previous | Next »