Comments on: Craig story three years old? http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/ Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"? Sun, 27 May 2012 11:43:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: tnjack http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1158 Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:24:17 +0000 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1158 I wonder if would’ve been released earlier if the “shoes” belonged to Barney Frank?

]]> By: Crush Liberalism http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1125 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 02:10:49 +0000 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1125 The story was held back because the reporter did not consider the previous allegations/accusations to be solid.

Uh-huh…with that much time elapsed. Sure. OK.

Liberal bias? Sounds to me more like responsible journalism.

I’ve never heard the expression “responsible journalism”. Seems like an oxymoron.

Was it “responsible journalism” when Dan Rather rushed to air a story with forged documents? Was it “responsible journalism” when NBC recently referenced a Sharpton parody site as an authentic source for actual Sharpton words? Was it “responsible journalism” when the MSM sat on the Foley story for over a year until the election cycle was in full swing? I could go on and on, but your naivité makes me chuckle. In each case of “responsible journalism”, it just so happens to be beneficial to liberals. But I’m sure that’s just a coinkidink.

Don’t print rumors or unproved allegations like some gossip rag.

Or like CBS News, or the NY Times. Same diff as “gossip rags”, I suppose.

Seriously…THREE years, and you’re defending that? Are you a journalist or a liberal (pardon the redundancy)?

]]> By: Joan http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1124 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:18:27 +0000 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1124 The story was held back because the reporter did not consider the previous allegations/accusations to be solid. It wasn’t until Craig pleaded guilty to the misdemeanor that it was printed.
Liberal bias? Sounds to me more like responsible journalism. Don’t print rumors or unproved allegations like some gossip rag.

]]> By: Hsu’s Your Diversionist Daddy? « Countenance Blog http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1123 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:35:34 +0000 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1123 [...] he was right — The media held the Larry Craig scandal as an “Ace in the Hole” (turns out, for three years), until they needed to play it in order to distract from something else, such as HRC and her links [...]

]]> By: Blue Collar Republican » Blog Archive » Blog Burst - August 31, 2007 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1113 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:56:39 +0000 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1113 [...] Craig story three years old? [...]

]]> By: david drake http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1106 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:54:14 +0000 http://crushliberalism.com/2007/08/30/craig-story-three-years-old/#comment-1106 Liberal Media Bias? Banish the thought!

]]>