I hate to burst the bubble of these PC peabrains but what does protecting sexual predators have to do with the interests of gays who aren’t predatory?

I think it is silly that Shane thinks condemning the immoral conduct(child molestation to be precise) of these two men is homophobia. I think he is being emotional and not thinking rationally. I wouldn’t think a child molestor who happens to be straight would be any less of a predator than a child molestor who happens to be gay,lesbian,bisexual and transexual.

Doesn’t this by proxy mean that if you are a homosexual than society’s rules and code of conduct doesn’t apply to you.
If these PC Peons had any brains they’d realize that they’re being homophobic.(Gotta love the sarcasm and twisted irony)
By creating different standards for Gays,Lesbians,Bisexuals and Transexuals they are saying that gay people are different even though they swear up and down that Gays are like everyone else.

What I’m trying to say is if these PC zealots believe what they are demanding us to accept than they should hold homosexuals who commit sexual crimes against children and other assorted victims accountable.

They even went so far as to say that men who sexually harrassed other men were not gay. @_@
Well if they’re not gay then are they bisexual? Of course the PC high priests wouldn’t even mention the sexuality of the culprits they would just deny reality to protect their prized victim group.
I’m thinking to myself who do they think they’re fooling……

Even though I think the gay lifestyle is immoral I don’t believe all gay people are evil pedophiles and shameless perverts!
Maybe instead of crying victim Gays,Lesbians,Bisexuals and Transexuals should just condemn the sexual predators who happen to have the same sexual orientation as them.

Why, when it takes place in England, of course. The latest horror story from the land of tolerance for the intolerant, if you’ve got the stomach for it (H/T: Michelle Malkin):

I just read the post again and I’m having trouble finding anything that comes close to saying all homosexuals are pedophiles. Can you point it out for me?

See, what I got out of this post is that children suffered abuse because spineless social workers and officials were afraid of being branded as homophobes from people like you.

Ditto on the dumbass.

I never said all homosexuals are pedophiles. What the story says is that THESE homosexuals are pedophiles, and that the warning signs were there for the authorities to see that THESE homosexuals were pedophiles. But the authorities chose to look the other way out of a fear of being branded as politically incorrect/homophobic/intolerant/(insert label du jour here).

So…are you defending THESE pedophiles because they’re homosexual? Because if you’re going to make the “logical” (and in your case, I use that word loosely) leap that my condemning of THESE homosexuals as pedophiles means that I think ALL homosexuals are pedophiles, then I can certainly make the “logical” leap that your defense of THESE homosexuals means that you think ALL homosexuals are entitled to molest children. I don’t think you really want to go there, do you?