<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reason #1,278 not to vote for Ron Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/</link>
	<description>Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jweaver</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jweaver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crush, you are right on. These folks are batty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crush, you are right on. These folks are batty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crushliberalism</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crushliberalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;“Neocon” has become the new boogieman.&lt;/i&gt;

No one can really tell us what a &quot;neocon&quot; is.  I&#039;m still waiting.


&lt;i&gt;Bless his little heart. He’s cute…in a delusional, completely out-of-touch kind of way.&lt;/i&gt;

Precious, isn&#039;t he?


&lt;i&gt;I don’t know what is more idiotic, Paul’s comment or George calling John a NeoCon.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m leaning towards the latter, but a case can be made for the former!  :-D


&lt;i&gt;Hey Georgie - If you would have told me the day after 9/11 that six years from then the only thing OBL was sending to America were videotapes- I’d consider that a victory.
...
Ron Paul is no Republican - he’s a libertarian with a kook streak. Sit him down.&lt;/i&gt;

Amen to that.  I finally see a libertarian run for president, and he turns out to be cuckoo.  Freakin&#039; wonderful.


&lt;i&gt;WTF is a “socialist neoconservative”???????????&lt;/i&gt;

Good catch, Lee.  I must have missed that when I stopped reading his moonbat guano.  Kudos to you for sticking with it, sir!  :)


&lt;i&gt;One sure way to bring the loonies out of the woodwork is to say anything bad about Ron Paul.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s the best &#039;bat bait I know of, TTH!


&lt;i&gt;Hey George I can play that game too. My theory (though it pales in comparison to yours) is that OBL is DEAD! That’s the only reason you haven’t been seeing action videos of him lately.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m thinking &lt;i&gt;Weekend at Bernie&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; here!  :-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“Neocon” has become the new boogieman.</i></p>
<p>No one can really tell us what a &#8220;neocon&#8221; is.  I&#8217;m still waiting.</p>
<p><i>Bless his little heart. He’s cute…in a delusional, completely out-of-touch kind of way.</i></p>
<p>Precious, isn&#8217;t he?</p>
<p><i>I don’t know what is more idiotic, Paul’s comment or George calling John a NeoCon.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m leaning towards the latter, but a case can be made for the former!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>Hey Georgie &#8211; If you would have told me the day after 9/11 that six years from then the only thing OBL was sending to America were videotapes- I’d consider that a victory.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Ron Paul is no Republican &#8211; he’s a libertarian with a kook streak. Sit him down.</i></p>
<p>Amen to that.  I finally see a libertarian run for president, and he turns out to be cuckoo.  Freakin&#8217; wonderful.</p>
<p><i>WTF is a “socialist neoconservative”???????????</i></p>
<p>Good catch, Lee.  I must have missed that when I stopped reading his moonbat guano.  Kudos to you for sticking with it, sir!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>One sure way to bring the loonies out of the woodwork is to say anything bad about Ron Paul.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the best &#8216;bat bait I know of, TTH!</p>
<p><i>Hey George I can play that game too. My theory (though it pales in comparison to yours) is that OBL is DEAD! That’s the only reason you haven’t been seeing action videos of him lately.</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking <i>Weekend at Bernie&#8217;s</i> here!  <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnjack</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tnjack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey George I can play that game too. My theory (though it pales in comparison to yours) is that OBL is DEAD! That&#039;s the only reason you haven&#039;t been seeing action videos of him lately.
C&#039;mon George. Whaddya think of my theory?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey George I can play that game too. My theory (though it pales in comparison to yours) is that OBL is DEAD! That&#8217;s the only reason you haven&#8217;t been seeing action videos of him lately.<br />
C&#8217;mon George. Whaddya think of my theory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth Hurts</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Truth Hurts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One sure way to bring the loonies out of the woodwork is to say anything bad about Ron Paul.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One sure way to bring the loonies out of the woodwork is to say anything bad about Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 06:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WTF is a &quot;socialist neoconservative&quot;???????????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is a &#8220;socialist neoconservative&#8221;???????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evrviglnt</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evrviglnt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Georgie - If you would have told me the day after 9/11 that six years from then the only thing OBL was sending to America were videotapes- I&#039;d consider that a victory.  What the hell has withdrawing our fighting forces from battle ever done for us?  For any country?

Ron Paul is no Republican - he&#039;s a libertarian with a kook streak.  Sit him down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Georgie &#8211; If you would have told me the day after 9/11 that six years from then the only thing OBL was sending to America were videotapes- I&#8217;d consider that a victory.  What the hell has withdrawing our fighting forces from battle ever done for us?  For any country?</p>
<p>Ron Paul is no Republican &#8211; he&#8217;s a libertarian with a kook streak.  Sit him down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KHarn</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KHarn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reguards to:

&gt;George Says: 
September 13th, 2007 at 3:11 pm&lt; 

I am not sure that he is conversant in the American dialect of ENGLISH. However, the accusing tone says it all.

PS: I am NOT a &quot;neocon&quot; as I have been a Southern Conservative all my life. (Going on fifty years!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reguards to:</p>
<p>&gt;George Says:<br />
September 13th, 2007 at 3:11 pm&lt; </p>
<p>I am not sure that he is conversant in the American dialect of ENGLISH. However, the accusing tone says it all.</p>
<p>PS: I am NOT a &#8220;neocon&#8221; as I have been a Southern Conservative all my life. (Going on fifty years!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know what is more idiotic, Paul’s comment or George calling John a NeoCon.

If Libertarians would run candidates that weren&#039;t out in left field they might actually have a snowballs chance in Hell of winning in this cycle!  Heck even Led Zeppelin is reforming, so anything could happen.

Needless to say, Paul is more crackers than a saltine factory.


Needless to say, Paul is more crackers than a saltine factory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what is more idiotic, Paul’s comment or George calling John a NeoCon.</p>
<p>If Libertarians would run candidates that weren&#8217;t out in left field they might actually have a snowballs chance in Hell of winning in this cycle!  Heck even Led Zeppelin is reforming, so anything could happen.</p>
<p>Needless to say, Paul is more crackers than a saltine factory.</p>
<p>Needless to say, Paul is more crackers than a saltine factory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManicNole</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ManicNole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, fess up, gang.  Which one of you hid Georgie&#039;s tin-foil-lined Power Ranger&#039;s toy helmet?  It&#039;s not nice to harass the little ones like that.  Please give it back to him so he can go back to playing his fantasy games with his Lego toys, and he can leave the adults to their discussions.  

Bless his little heart.  He&#039;s cute...in a delusional, completely out-of-touch kind of way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, fess up, gang.  Which one of you hid Georgie&#8217;s tin-foil-lined Power Ranger&#8217;s toy helmet?  It&#8217;s not nice to harass the little ones like that.  Please give it back to him so he can go back to playing his fantasy games with his Lego toys, and he can leave the adults to their discussions.  </p>
<p>Bless his little heart.  He&#8217;s cute&#8230;in a delusional, completely out-of-touch kind of way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skul</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George, George, come back.  Please, a little more of your distortions and ignorance would be greatly appreciated.

Wow, folks, that loon hasn&#039;t a clue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, George, come back.  Please, a little more of your distortions and ignorance would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Wow, folks, that loon hasn&#8217;t a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JsinGood</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JsinGood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I listened to a lot of this interview the other night live, and yeah, I think Ron Paul&#039;s a loon.  I  never really bought into his claim that the Iraq War is &quot;unconstitutional&quot; because Congress did or did not declare war.  I would say the vote they cast effectively declared war, regardless of the language used.  The fact of the matter is, Bush got Congressional approval and our system of checks and balances remained intact.  There&#039;s way, way too much nutty paranoia going around about Bush and the *gasp* &quot;NEOCONS&quot;.  &quot;Neocon&quot; has become the new boogieman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to a lot of this interview the other night live, and yeah, I think Ron Paul&#8217;s a loon.  I  never really bought into his claim that the Iraq War is &#8220;unconstitutional&#8221; because Congress did or did not declare war.  I would say the vote they cast effectively declared war, regardless of the language used.  The fact of the matter is, Bush got Congressional approval and our system of checks and balances remained intact.  There&#8217;s way, way too much nutty paranoia going around about Bush and the *gasp* &#8220;NEOCONS&#8221;.  &#8220;Neocon&#8221; has become the new boogieman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul gives me the heebies. 

Big time!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul gives me the heebies. </p>
<p>Big time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoubleD</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DoubleD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the immortal words of Fred Sanford, (George) &quot;You big Dhimmi&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the immortal words of Fred Sanford, (George) &#8220;You big Dhimmi&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crushliberalism</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crushliberalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It never fails.  Put out something less than flattering about the Bircheresque crank, and some teed-off mouthbreathing supporter of his will come in with poorly written (and poorly spelled) tinfoil rants every time: &lt;i&gt;Blah-blah-blah, &quot;neocons&quot;, blah-blah-blah, &quot;my guy polling at 2% rules!&quot;, blah-blah-blah...&lt;/i&gt;

Duly noted, George.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It never fails.  Put out something less than flattering about the Bircheresque crank, and some teed-off mouthbreathing supporter of his will come in with poorly written (and poorly spelled) tinfoil rants every time: <i>Blah-blah-blah, &#8220;neocons&#8221;, blah-blah-blah, &#8220;my guy polling at 2% rules!&#8221;, blah-blah-blah&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Duly noted, George.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You Neoconservatives claims that the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, domestic spying, and the National ID have prevented. Do you have any proof? What good has the bureaucratic monsters of FEMA and the DHS done are country? In case you haven’t noticed, bin Laden is still producing and shipping out his home made videos, and we’re no closer toward busting his butt than we were before the Bush administration claimed their unconstitutional right to spy. We’re even more vulnerable to more terrorist attacks, the borders are still wide open while we’re bogged down in a costly, bloody, expensive war in Iraq. Yet the Neocons think that the solution is even more socialism, more bureaucracy, more government powers, even larger budgets, give up more liberties for nothing?

The truth is that Ron Paul is the only real Conservative running for President. I’ll say that again. Bringing our troops home, defending the borders, pulling out of the United Nations, IMF, World Bank, removing all hostile and aggressive trade barriers toward other countries (yes, that includes Cuba) is the only way that moderate Muslims will embrace Americanism and flee from the radicals.

Ron Paul is the only candidate who is willing to bring the perpetrators of 9/11. Had Ron Paul been president after 9/11, Ron Paul would have immediately issued letters of marque and reprisal for bin Laden and his mafia. This is the proper Constitutional response to terrorist attacks, since al-Quada is not a government or country. However, not only is the mastermind of the 9/11 still sitting snug in his cave in Pakistan making home-videos, but we’re bogged down in nation building in three nations (have you already forgotten Somalia?) and on the verge of getting bogged down in a fourth.

You big-government, Rockefeller, socialist neoconservatives must not realize that Ron Paul received more military campaign contributions than any other Republican. This is because the honorary men and women who serve in our military know that the military has been stretched too thin and that nation building and policing the world is a sick dream of the Neocons and not the proper function of the military.

Individual liberty is the anecdote to terrorism. That’s why Rudy Giuliani, McCain, and Thompson are no different than Hilary or Edwards, and none of these are any different than Bush. Ron Paul is the only real alternative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You Neoconservatives claims that the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, domestic spying, and the National ID have prevented. Do you have any proof? What good has the bureaucratic monsters of FEMA and the DHS done are country? In case you haven’t noticed, bin Laden is still producing and shipping out his home made videos, and we’re no closer toward busting his butt than we were before the Bush administration claimed their unconstitutional right to spy. We’re even more vulnerable to more terrorist attacks, the borders are still wide open while we’re bogged down in a costly, bloody, expensive war in Iraq. Yet the Neocons think that the solution is even more socialism, more bureaucracy, more government powers, even larger budgets, give up more liberties for nothing?</p>
<p>The truth is that Ron Paul is the only real Conservative running for President. I’ll say that again. Bringing our troops home, defending the borders, pulling out of the United Nations, IMF, World Bank, removing all hostile and aggressive trade barriers toward other countries (yes, that includes Cuba) is the only way that moderate Muslims will embrace Americanism and flee from the radicals.</p>
<p>Ron Paul is the only candidate who is willing to bring the perpetrators of 9/11. Had Ron Paul been president after 9/11, Ron Paul would have immediately issued letters of marque and reprisal for bin Laden and his mafia. This is the proper Constitutional response to terrorist attacks, since al-Quada is not a government or country. However, not only is the mastermind of the 9/11 still sitting snug in his cave in Pakistan making home-videos, but we’re bogged down in nation building in three nations (have you already forgotten Somalia?) and on the verge of getting bogged down in a fourth.</p>
<p>You big-government, Rockefeller, socialist neoconservatives must not realize that Ron Paul received more military campaign contributions than any other Republican. This is because the honorary men and women who serve in our military know that the military has been stretched too thin and that nation building and policing the world is a sick dream of the Neocons and not the proper function of the military.</p>
<p>Individual liberty is the anecdote to terrorism. That’s why Rudy Giuliani, McCain, and Thompson are no different than Hilary or Edwards, and none of these are any different than Bush. Ron Paul is the only real alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bat sh*t insane!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bat sh*t insane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Truth Hurts</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Truth Hurts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/09/13/reason-1278-not-to-vote-for-ron-paul/#comment-1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pitcher?  I think he stole a case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitcher?  I think he stole a case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

