Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

UF Gayturd melts down after loss to Auburn

I’m not suggesting this guy is representative of UF fans.  Not at all.  I doubt that RV is the kind of guy who’d be screaming “You’re fired, Meyer!” and “You suck, Tebow! You should transfer!” in a frothing rage after a Gator loss.

However, I think the flit boy is taking this loss a little too personally.  Link here, but be warned: it’s full of lots of bad words.  If grown-up words uttered by this post-pubescent dimwit don’t offend you, then you’ll absolutely love the entertainment value of dude’s meltdown.

I mean, I get royally ticked when the Noles lose (and goodness knows that’s happened a lot over the last few years).  But I don’t know that I’ve ever gotten Jack-Nicholson-in-The Shining nuts over a loss, even during my immature college years.  Anywho, this is fun for the whole family grown-ups in the family who are not easily offended.

October 1, 2007 Posted by | non-political | 3 Comments

Criminal alien convicted as serial rapist, MSM buries immigration status

Political correctness could be the death of us yet.  From Ace:

Guess That Status! New MSM Trick Is To Bury Illegal Aliens’ Status Down Deep In Article

—Ace

Because Guess That Party! was so much fun, it’s spawned a sequel.

Rapist Receives 40 Years In Plea Deal reads the headline. Fair enough. An illegal status isn’t quite on the level of rape. But how many paragraphs do you think you’ll have to read to find this information out?

More paragraphs than you’re willing to read? Ah, that’s the intention, isn’t it?

One had been asleep in her Haltom City home when she was attacked. Her children were in a nearby room.Another woman had been waiting in her car for a friend outside an Arlington apartment complex when she was dragged from her car, forced to a nearby field and raped.

The third had just arrived home from work and was unlocking the front door of her Fort Worth apartment when she was hit from behind, shoved inside and raped.

Friday morning, the three women came together in a Tarrant County courtroom to address Jose G. Carrillo, the 32-year-old man who pleaded guilty this week to attacking them and one other woman in exchange for a 40-year prison sentence.

One after the other, the three women took a seat in front of the courtroom, looked Carrillo in the eye and explained why he was getting what he deserved.

‘I will go on living, enjoying life. I’m going to enjoy my freedom. I’m going to enjoy watching my kids grow old,’ the Haltom City victim told Carrillo. ‘These are the simple things that will be taken away from you.

‘It gives me great pleasure. I hope you realize in time that because of your sick, selfish, twisted, cowardly acts that you did to women, that you deserve the future that is set before you,’ she added.

It was for a fourth case, the January 2006 rape of an 18-year-old woman attacked as she walked to work in north Fort Worth, that Carrillo was to stand trial Oct. 8. But on Wednesday, Carrillo, who authorities say is in this country illegally, opted to seek a plea agreement with prosecutors instead.

After a day of negotiations, he pleaded guilty to three of the charges for which he’d been indicted — two aggravated sexual assaults and a burglary of a habitation with intent to commit sexual assault. He also pleaded guilty to a charge of aggravated sexual assault for the Arlington rape. He had not been previously charged in that case because investigators had only a partial DNA profile linking him to the crime, prosecutors said.

Note that he couldn’t be prosecuted in those previous rapes and assaults do to lack of beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence, and that’s our system: Fine. But he could certainly have been deported previously based upon what seems relatively easy to establish beyond any doubt: That he was in the country illegally.

And yet he was allowed to continue raping and raiding at his pleasure because of our g0dd#mned murderous political correctness.

I wonder if the latest victim of his vicious rape-obsession applauds the sanctuary city regime. I wonder if she, too, agrees that the it’s somehow wrong to ask if a career felon is even in the country legally. 

A mere parenthetical reference to his criminal immigration status found way down in the article?  Nope…no liberal media bias!

October 1, 2007 Posted by | illegal immigration, media bias, political correctness | 8 Comments

Dems: Adults who quit smoking are killing kids

More economic ignorance by the left here. Yeah, I know…big surprise, huh? From FNC:

Congressional Democrats have chosen an unlikely source to pay for the bulk of their proposed $35 billion increase in children’s health coverage: people with relatively little money and education.

The program expansion passed by the House and Senate last week would be financed with a 156 percent increase in the federal cigarette tax, taking it to $1 per pack from the current 39 cents. Low-income people smoke more heavily than do wealthier people in the United States, making cigarette taxes a regressive form of revenue.

Democrats, who wrote the legislation and provided most of its votes, generally portray themselves as champions of the poor. They do not dispute that the tax plan would hit poor communities disproportionately, but they say it is worth it to provide health insurance to millions of modest-income children.

All the better, they say, if higher cigarette taxes discourage smoking.

“I’m very happy that we’re paying for this,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in an interview Friday, noting that the plan would not add to the deficit. “The health of the children is extremely important,” he said. “In the long run, maybe it’ll stop people from smoking.”

What. An. Idiot.

Democrats “do not dispute that the tax plan would hit poor communities disproportionately, but they say it is worth it to provide health insurance to millions of modest-income children.” In other words, “screw the poor!” I thought they attributed that mindset solely to Republicans? Or is it OK to screw the poor if your motives for said screwing are more pure and noble? After all, poor-screwing can be virtuous, if your party affiliation begins with a “D”, right?

If you raise the price of cigarettes by a large tax increase, and you pledge to use the tax receipts to fund children’s health care, then you are counting on that tax money to be there. Some people will quit smoking because it has become too expensive for them, which Reid seems to applaud. However, won’t these folks who quit smoking be seen as callous individuals for not funding children’s health care? “We need you to slowly kill yourself with emphysema and lung cancer so the children can get health care, and you’re a heartless and selfish b#stard if you quit!”

I guess I should go buy a pack of Camels. It’s for the children.

October 1, 2007 Posted by | economic ignorance, hypocrisy, smoking | 4 Comments

Murtha to testify in defamation suit

From Hot Air:

He’ll have to submit a deposition. Hopefully he’ll be more forthcoming this time than his office was when I called them up last month. Perhaps by the time he testifies, he’ll actually know what’s going on in the trials. Not that not having all the facts slowed him down from pronouncing the Marines guilty of murder “in cold blood” starting last year.

A federal judge refused Friday to dismiss a defamation case against Rep. John P. Murtha and ordered the Pennsylvania Democrat to give a sworn deposition in the case.

A Marine Corps sergeant is suing the 16-term congressman for alleging “cold-blooded murder and war crimes” by unnamed soldiers in connection with the deaths of Iraqi civilians in the town of Haditha.

The deaths became known in May 2006 when Murtha, who opposes the Iraq war, said at a Capitol Hill news conference that a Pentagon war crimes investigation will show Marines killed dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians in the town in 2005.

Murtha’s office declined to comment on the ruling. He has said his intention was to draw attention to the pressure put on troops in Iraq and to cover-up the incident.

The Justice Department wanted the case dismissed because Murtha was acting in his official role as a lawmaker. Assistant U.S. Attorney John F. Henault said the comments were made as part of the debate over the war in Iraq.

This is one of the many areas where I’ll depart from the Bush administration, which is in charge of the Justice Department. Murtha slandered those troops and his repeated slanders of them echoed throughout the entire world. Murtha damaged our cause in the war. A civil slander suit is the least of the legal problems he ought to face for that.

And as the judge points out, giving Murtha a pass here might set dangerous precedent.

“You’re writing a very wide road for members of Congress to go to their home districts and say anything they choose about private persons and be able to do so without any liability. Are you sure you want to do that?” Collyer said, adding later, “How far can a congressman go and still be protected?”

Collyer said she was troubled by the idea the lawmakers are immune from lawsuits regardless of what they say to advance their political careers.

If average Americans can’t get away with slander, why should Murtha? 

Squirm, you piece of donkey excrement.

October 1, 2007 Posted by | Murtha | 2 Comments

Justice Thomas: Liberals as bad as Southern racists

He should know.  He grew up smack dab in the middle of it.  From ABC News:

Thomas’s most deeply felt opinions are about race, and he pulls no punches. For Thomas, the menacing racists who donned white sheets in the segregated South of his childhood are as bad or worse as the northern liberal zealots in suits and ties.

“These people who claim to be progressive … have been far more vicious to me than any southerner,” Thomas says, “and it is purely ideological.”

Thomas talks about the virulent racism he encountered growing up in the segregated South, when blacks were considered second-class citizens and kept separate from whites by law, and he equates those attitudes with the stereotypes he believes people hold today.

“People get bent out of shape about the fact that when I was a kid, you could not drink out of certain water fountains. Well, the water was the same. My grandfather always said that, ‘The water’s exactly the same.’ But those same people are extremely comfortable saying I can’t drink from this fountain of knowledge,” Thomas says. “They certainly don’t see themselves as being like the bigots in the South. Well, I’ve lived both experiences. And I really don’t see that they’re any different from them.”

He says his critics — the people who question whether he is smart or qualified to be on the Court or who suggest he merely does what a white Supreme Court colleague dictates — are as also as bigoted as the whites of his childhood in the deep South.

“People feel free to say about me what they think about lots of blacks,” Thomas said in an interview in his chambers at the Supreme Court. “Because of the heterodox views I’ve taken, they have license to say it about me with impunity.”

He’s 100% correct. The “tolerant” and “diverse” left feel free to call Thomas an “Uncle Tom” or other derisive names because they feel they can get away with it, since Thomas strays from the liberal massa’s plantation. The same left that purports to be appalled by racism perpetrate that very thing when it comes to Thomas, and they don’t see their hypocrisy at all (or, as is usually the case, they see it but don’t care).

October 1, 2007 Posted by | bigotry, hypocrisy | 4 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers