Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

MSM yawns over moonbat rep’s remarks

From Michelle Malkin:

Rep. Pete Stark starts blabbering about Republicans who don’t want to spend money on children, but instead want to spend it on “an illegal war” to be fought by children whom Republicans want to send to Iraq to “blow people up” and “get their heads blown up” for “his amusement.”
…
See my new post on Pete StarkRavingMad. These people can’t contain themselves. And let’s stop the delusion that the Starks are the fringe. They are the center of the nutroots-i-fied Democrat Party.

Shocker! Not a word in the NYTimes coverage of the override vote failure about Stark’s remarks.

Nothing in the latest WaPo story, either!

Because, you know, Democrats debasing the president and dragging the debate into the sewer on the House floor is just not news. 

Compare and contrast: Trent Lott (Republican) waxes eloquent about how much better life would be had Strom Thurmond been elected president back in 1948; Pete Stark (Democrat) accuses the commander-in-chief of getting his rocks off to the thought of American GI’s getting decapitated.  Which one does the MSM find outrageous?  Nope…no liberal media bias!


October 19, 2007 - Posted by crushliberalism | media bias, moonbats

7 Comments »

  1. He actually said our troops were blowing up “innocent people”.

    The Republicans demanded his remarks be stricken from the record, but the Democrat woman chair allowed the remarks to remain.

    This guy needs to be run out of office.

    Needless to say, no one would answer the phone at Congressman chicken$hit’s office yesterday.

    We need to give California back to Mexico.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | October 19, 2007

  2. Or perhaps it wasn’t reported because it’s all too common to hear pointless, inflammatory, and possibly derogatory remarks from both sides. Politicians talking bad about each other is old news.

    Comment by wailin | October 19, 2007

  3. Wailin, I’d say you were probably right, if not for the fact that the MSM reports pointless, inflammatory (and even non-inflammatory comments like Lott’s), derogatory remarks all the time IF they come from Republicans. Dems? Aw, who cares, right?

    Comment by crushliberalism | October 19, 2007

  4. Personally, I pay no attention to any of it. Sticks and stones, ya? You’re right though, it depends on the leaning of the reporting agency. There really aren’t any independent, unbiased sources to be found.

    Comment by wailin | October 19, 2007

  5. This morning on CNN’s morning show they played the soundbite and asked the viewers to email the answer to a survey. The question was, “Do you think Stark should apologize or not?”
    According to CNN the answer, from their viewers, was 11% said to apologize and 89% said no apology was necessary!
    I don’t believe their poll.

    Comment by tnjack | October 19, 2007

  6. AOL ran a similar poll regarding Stark’s comments; the results were quite different.

    Comment by Henry | October 19, 2007

  7. Oh yeah, I forgot to add, regarding Kanaka Girl’s comment, not all of us in California should be condemned for one sh*t head’s comments.

    Comment by Henry | October 19, 2007


Leave a comment

« Previous | Next »