Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Obama’s children donors

Not to be outdone by Shrillary’s Hsu-shining corruption, Barry O is angling for some of his own.  Apparently, not only is Osamabama running for the children, but he’s running bankrolled by the children.  From the Washington comPost:

Elrick Williams’s toddler niece Carlyn may be one of the youngest contributors to this year’s presidential campaign. The 2-year-old gave $2,300 to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

So did her sister and brother, Imara, 13, and Ishmael, 9, and her cousins Chan and Alexis, both 13. Altogether, according to newly released campaign finance reports, the extended family of Williams, a wealthy Chicago financier, handed over nearly a dozen checks in March for the maximum allowed under federal law to Obama.

Such campaign donations from young children would almost certainly run afoul of campaign finance regulations, several campaign lawyers said. But as bundlers seek to raise higher and higher sums for presidential contenders this year, the number who are turning to checks from underage givers appears to be on the rise.

“It’s not difficult for a banker or a trial lawyer or a hedge fund manager to come up with $2,300, and they’re often left wanting to do more,” said Massie Ritsch, a spokesman for the Center for Responsive Politics. “That’s when they look across the dinner table at their children and see an opportunity.”

Asked about the Williams family giving, Obama spokesman Bill Burton said, “As a policy, we don’t take donations from anyone under the age of 15.” After being asked by The Post about the matter, he said the children’s donations will be returned.

How about “as a policy, we don’t take donations from anyone still using a teething ring”? That would be a nice start.

Advertisement

October 24, 2007 - Posted by | corruption, Obama

2 Comments »

  1. “As a policy, we don’t take donations from anyone under the age of 15.”

    - LMAO! Such high standards they have! ;-)

    Comment by dave drake | October 24, 2007

  2. So, returning illegal contributions negates the fact that campaign finance laws were violated? Hmmm…

    Comment by Henry | October 25, 2007


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers