Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Pe-loco: Shhh! I support Rangel’s tax-thru-the-nose scheme, but not “officially”

The headline reads thusly: “Pelosi finesses tax message”.  I suppose that sounds a lot better than “I think we should implement an oppressive tax structure that returns us to Jimmah Carter’s tax days”, wouldn’t you say?  We call that “trying to polish a turd.”  From The Hill:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi  (D-Calif.) is finessing her support of Rep. Charles Rangel’s (D-N.Y.) controversial new tax bill, highlighting Democrats’ concern about how Republicans plan to use it in the 2008 elections.

Following the unveiling of arguably the most politically explosive domestic policy bill of the 110th Congress last Thursday, Pelosi seemed to wholeheartedly support the tax overhaul authored by Ways and Means Committee Chairman Rangel.

“I certainly support his plan,” Pelosi (D-Calif.) said to the assembled reporters.

But when the transcript of the briefing came out, words were inserted — highlighted by brackets — clarifying that she supported his goal, if not his specific proposals.

The final transcript read: “I certainly support his plan [to begin tax reform.]”

The distinction is an important one. Rangel was immediately criticized by the GOP as he announced his highly controversial tax plan and Republicans started trying to tie the plan to Pelosi and the Democratic leadership.

The change makes it clear that the House’s Democratic leader is supporting only the concept of changing tax laws, not every one of Rangel’s proposed changes, which would raise taxes for people with higher incomes and cut them for those with lower incomes.

The change didn’t take. Stories in The Associated Press and Congressional Quarterly (CQ) ran the initial quote.

The Federal News Service and LexisNexis transcripts don’t include the change. The CQ transcript, which notes at the top, “AS RELEASED BY REP. PELOSI’S OFFICE,” does include the after-the-fact change in brackets.

Republicans criticized the change, but irritated Pelosi aides said too much is being made of an innocent change that was not intended to deceive.

“It is clear she didn’t say it, but we put in there, in brackets, to clarify her intent,” Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami said in an e-mail exchange. “She personally supports Rangel’s plan/bill to begin tax reform, but Congress will work its will.” 

It’s not the first time that Republicans have faulted Democrats for changing the record. After a vote was incorrectly gaveled to a close too early on Aug. 2, Republicans say Democratic leaders scrubbed from The Congressional Record many of the floor comments of House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) and Boehner.

“Don’t like the outcome of a vote? Change it. Don’t like the way transcripts read? Scrub them,” Kennedy added.

Yeah, sure.  San Fran Nan was enthuiastic about just a generic “tax modification”, huh?  What a crock!  Rangel represents the Democrats’ class warfare mentality, and now Peloser and her ilk are trying their best damage control.  They’re afraid that they’ll be seen as the socialist tax-and-spend achievement-averse leftists that they truly are.

Rangel will suffer no repercussions for his socialism.  After all, he represents Harlem, and since most of his constituents are poor enough to pay little to no income taxes anyway, what would they care?

October 30, 2007 Posted by | economic ignorance, Pelosi, socialism, taxes | 4 Comments

Kos kooks: Bush destroyed my marriage!

Is there anything that the moonbats can’t blame on Bush?  I’m going to go out on a limb and guess “No” on that.  From Right Wing News:

Let this thread over at the Daily Kos be a warning to you: life is bigger than politics. Yes, politics and ideology are important, but you shouldn’t take things to such an extreme that you let it make you miserable or wreck your relationships with your friends or family.

Granted, sometimes you will run into people who are really loud and obnoxious about their political views, so much so that it’s difficult to deal with them, but hopefully people like that will be unusual in your life.

If you’re getting so into politics that it’s destroying your relationships, it might be time to step back and put things in perspective lest you end up like the Kossacks who actually blame George Bush for ruining their friendships and marriages…

angrybird: Have the Bush years taken a toll on your relationships?I wrote a diary a short time ago about how the Bush administration helped ruin my marriage. It wasn’t because my husband was a Bush supporter or anything…it was because of all the stresses from job loses, living without health insurance and getting sick, to my husband being forced to take a job where he wasn’t home much that helped ruin my marriage.

However…I started thinking about other relationships that have indeed been killed because those people where Bush supporters.

…Please share your stories about how the bush administration has taken it’s toll on your relationships; they can be stories from economy related to the personal. I promise you will feel better if you share :-) “ 

Well, my large-chested hot college girlfriend and I broke up in 1994, so I guess I should blame that on Bill Clinton.  Just like that, my relationship with them…er, her…was over.  Damn you, Bubba…damn you to hell!  For those of you on the left, this paragraph is sarcasm (the buxom girlfriend part is true, Bubba being the source of our dissolution is not).

You should give yourself a chuckle and read the rest of the bat guano blaming Dubya for moonbats’ inability to maintain a nurturing relationship.  While I don’t get off on broken marriages, I have little sympathy for people whose lives are so wrapped up in politics that it destroys their ability to forge deep emotional bonds with other people.  In short: get a life.

October 30, 2007 Posted by | moonbats | 3 Comments

Romney compares Shrillary to an intern

During an interview with Sean Hannity, Mitt Romney says this about Her Highness:

She hasn’t run anything, and the government of the United States is not a place for a president to be an intern. You need to have experience actually leading and running things. 

That’s preposterous!  I mean, the biggest difference between Hillary and an intern is that Bubba sleeps with an intern.  C’mon, Mitt, be a little more accurate next time!

October 30, 2007 Posted by | Hillary, Romney | 3 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers