Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Shrillary was for licenses for criminal aliens…before she was against it

Not only is Her Highness for and then against licenses, she said it before she didn’t say it!  Now that, my friends, is talent!  From Suitably Flip:

Criminey.  Asked in tonight’s debate about why she supports Governor Spitzer’s illegal immigrant voter registration drive, Hillary seemed to accidentally back herself into the corner of estimating the number of illegal immigrants in New York State.  After stammering a bit, she took a swing: “Several million.”  Yowza.  Spitzer himself pegged the number as being between 500,000 and a million.  Still a huge number, but Clinton’s guess was off by as much as a factor of 10, depending on how you take your “several”.  How seriously can we assume she’s analyzed this issue if she can’t even quantify the problem anywhere near the right ballpark in her own state.
…
Russert went on to press her about whether she does or does not support the plan to issue driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants, something she’s explicitly supported in recent days in New Hampshire.  Ever resolute, she went on to firmly declare that she both does and does not support such a plan, and furthermore, that she both did and did not ever say such a thing in New Hampshire.

Even more amazing is the fact that she’s absolutely right.  She managed to do both.

Video of the Hildebeast’s waffling is here. 

Kerry redux, 2008 edition.  Friggin’ wonderful.


October 31, 2007 - Posted by crushliberalism | Hillary, hypocrisy, illegal immigration

3 Comments »

  1. She’s just repeaating the training from husband Bill-ary, who always spoke TO the audience at hand accordingly. In this case she spoke to both audiences, those for it and those against it. John F—ing Kerry must be so proud!

    Comment by tnjack | October 31, 2007

  2. I guess it depends on what the definition of “for” is.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | October 31, 2007

  3. Dang Hillary is imploding!
    How can she not have any strong convictions and expect to be a strong woman let alone a strong leader of a super-power?
    Lack of convictions equals weak woman equals wimpy leader equals unfit to lead the USA as president!
    Sheesh and I thought John Kerry was a wet noodle.

    Comment by Chilerkle | November 1, 2007


Leave a comment

« Previous | Next »