Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

NYT buries “routing” of Al Qaeda from Baghdad

Way back on page A19, you’ll find this:

American forces have routed Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, the Iraqi militant network, from every neighborhood of Baghdad, a top American general said today, allowing American troops involved in the “surge” to depart as planned.

Maj. Gen. Joseph F. Fil Jr., commander of United States forces in Baghdad, also said that American troops had yet to clear some 13 percent of the city, including Sadr City and several other areas controlled by Shiite militias. But, he said, “there’s just no question” that violence had declined since a spike in June.

“Murder victims are down 80 percent from where they were at the peak,” and attacks involving improvised bombs are down 70 percent, he said. 

Great news and huge signs of progress must be relegated to the back pages when possible.  Nope…no liberal media bias!

November 8, 2007 Posted by | Iraq, media bias | 6 Comments

Blame the weak dollar on the tax code

In part, anyway.  An enlightening analysis from the Heritage Foundation:

The inherent strength of the peculiarly American version of free enterprise is shown by how long and how well the U.S. economy has been able to withstand the constant battering by wrong-headed government policies — but the bulwarks are starting to weaken.

Once upon a time the “greenback” was the world’s premier currency. Now the dollar is cheaper in value than both the euro and the British pound.

In recent months, it has twice hit record lows. Every time our currency cheapens, the dollar price of oil and everything we import goes up.

With less purchasing power in the global marketplace, we Americans are poorer than we were before. We lose confidence in ourselves and stature in the eyes of others.

Currencies rise and fall against one another in international exchange markets on an almost daily basis and for a variety of reasons — including the recent expansion of the money supply by the Federal Reserve.

But the long-term weakness of the dollar is fundamentally the result of two failings.

First, we Americans do not save enough to meet the economy’s requirements for capital investments.

We must, therefore, each year acquire from other countries about $700 billion of capital to fill the hole left by our profligacy. Second, and corollary to our lack of saving and investment, we consume more than we produce.

We must, therefore, acquire from other countries not only large amounts of their savings but also large amounts of their goods and services.

Because our exports (dollars flowing in, goods flowing out) are much less than our imports (dollars flowing out, goods flowing in), there is an oversupply of dollars in the international market that drives down the price.

The federal government is strongly implicated in America’s spendthrift status, its enormous trade deficit, the weak dollar and the fact that most Americans are less well-off than they should be.

More than a hundred years ago, Henry David Thoreau (hardly a right-wing ideologue) had already tumbled to the sad truth about government.

He wrote: “The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in the way.”

Insofar as profligacy is concerned, the federal government leads by example. For 24 of the past 30 years, it has run a substantial budget deficit, having spent more than it takes in in revenue — and when it does so, it reduces national savings.

Federal budget deficits are dissaving by the government in the same way that individuals dissave when they spend more than they earn. Most Americans follow the government’s example.

Those who rebel and who do save and invest are punished with extra taxes. The government has for decades deliberately taxed income that is saved and invested far more heavily than income that is immediately consumed.

Gross private savings has been less than gross private investment for 26 of the past 30 years.

Not only do taxes on savings and investment weaken the dollar, they slow the growth of the private economy — often costing Americans $3 billion in lost incomes and jobs for every $1 billion of revenue yield to the government. The total cost of tax-induced collateral damage to the economy is about $2.5 trillion per year.

Now the Democrats in control of Congress, led by New York Rep. Charles Rangel, are preparing to kick up the deadweight loss to the economy by another $2.9 trillion.

That’s a $2,600 annual whack for every family in America for the next 10 years — and that’s only for starters.

To make matters worse — especially insofar as concerns the trade deficit — the government heavily taxes the export of American-made goods, making it hard for companies to compete in the global markets from their home base in America.

But when American companies flee this country and operate abroad — because of the penalties on exports or for other reasons — they get a tax holiday from the U.S. government, provided they reinvest their foreign-source profits abroad to the benefit of some other country’s economy.

Woe be unto them, however, if they bring the money home to reinvest in America. The government will tax them.

No wonder the annual U.S. trade deficit is about $0.7 trillion and is equal to nearly 6% of America’s entire gross domestic product. And no wonder those in other countries are downgrading their view of the American economy and downgrading the dollar. 

The current tax structure in this country is a mess, and it’s finally beginning to mess up the economy in terms of dollars being weakened and revenue going unrecognized domestically.  Sure, we have a lot of great economic indicators: low unemployment, record high stock market, record high home ownership, etc. But if the dollar continues to slide, the bill become due at some point. One thing would fix that problem in a jiffy, though: the Fair Tax.

November 8, 2007 Posted by | economic ignorance, Fair Tax, taxes | 2 Comments

UN heads to tropics for global “warming” retreat

Hypocrisy, corruption, etc.  That’s the United Nations for you.  Glad to see those folks taking climate crisis so seriously!  From Pajamas Media:

The would-be regulators of the world’s climate (and your wallet) will be jetting to Bali this December for Ban Ki-Moon’s next UN weather fest: “UN Climate Change Conference 2007.” UN policy allows even the lowlier UN staffers to travel business class on long-haul flights (your tax dollars at work), the better to arrive wined, dined and ready to hit the ground …and the beaches … and the golf courses … and the tennis courts — running. Apparently there is so much to discuss that the conference will run for a full fortnight, from Dec. 3-14, at Bali’s seaside luxury resort of Nusa Dua.

For all those taxpayer mugs out there who have not had the experience of flying business class to spend a fortnight at Nusa Dua, check out the spectacular seaside photos of the Bali International Convention Center, with its slogan: “The Place…Where Business is a Pleasure.” For more information, page through the Bali conference outline on the UN Framework Convention for Climate Change, or UNFCC, web site. This includes a handy list of pre/post conference tours, and a list of hotels (Nusa Dua Beach Hotel and Spa, and Melia Bali Villas and Spa Resort, already sold out) plus recreational facilities: sailing, fishing, snorkeling, ocean kayaking, and, of course, the shopping gallery.

There, undistracted by the winter winds whipping past the UN’s NY headquarters (now prepping for a $2 billion renovation), they will discuss the many ways in which the UN can collect fees and fund more conferences via taxes and productivity caps administered by the same UN system which refuses to open its own books to the public (where is that full and transparent accounting we were promised for the tsunami donations?).

Recall that the UN apparently rebuffed out of hand a recent invitation from Canada to move its headquarters north. One might just wonder — would “climate change,” be such an urgent UN issue were UN bureaucrats required to hold their meetings without availing themselves quite so amply of other people’s money to enjoy their own convenient change of climate.

Quick Multiple Choice Quiz on the UN system: Will the UN release for the perusal of Joe-average taxpayer a detailed post-conference breakdown of staff expense accounts for Ban’s bash on Bali?

A. Ha

B. Ha-ha

C. You’ve got to be kidding

D. In order to operate, the UN must preserve its confidentiality in such matters. Tennis, anyone? 

I don’t think there’s much more for me to add to that, now is there?  Well, maybe one thing: the United Nations is more useless than tits on a boar.

November 8, 2007 Posted by | corruption, global warming, hypocrisy, United Nations | 1 Comment

Hillary leaves $0 tip for single mother waitress

It takes a village…to stiff a working woman.  From NPR:

I  followed Clinton during a recent bus tour across Iowa, when she and her entourage pulled into a Maid-Rite, a greasy spoon famous for its loose-meat sandwich. Clinton settled into a red stool at the counter, ate a sandwich, chatted with her waitress and then was on her way.

The scene gave Clinton perfect fodder for her next few stump speeches. It turns out her waitress was a single, working mom — just the kind of voter Democrats are courting aggressively this year.

Clinton recalled the meeting for an audience up the road in Boone. “The woman waiting on us — it was her first day,” she said, adding, “She was a little nervous. Single mom, raised two boys, works at a nursing home and always has a second job.”

If she’s elected president, Clinton promised, people like her waitress will have it better. (As long as they don’t rely on Her Highness’ tips. – Ed.)

The way Clinton eased the waitress into her rhetoric is something repeated day after day, by all the campaigns. But in the process, people like the waitress don’t always have their stories told.

‘Nobody Got Left a Tip’

“I wished I would have been asked first,” the waitress, Anita Esterday, said of Clinton’s decision to insert her in a speech. “I wish she would have asked if she could talk about me later. I didn’t like it when someone called me up and said Hillary Clinton is talking about you. It’s like, what’d I do now? What’s she saying?”

When I returned to the Maid-Rite a few weeks later, Esterday said the senator had caught her off guard. But once they got talking, she was honest with Clinton about her need to work two to three jobs.

“I’ve been doing it all my life. Why should it change now that I’m old,” Esterday said.

Esterday does not think Clinton got it. “I don’t think she understood at all what I was saying,” Esterday said. “I mean, nobody got left a tip that day.”

Clinton may have decided not to tip. She was also never given a bill — her meal was on the house. Still, Esterday said Clinton might have left her something: “Maybe they don’t carry money. I don’t know.” 

Always the champion of the little guy/gal, isn’t she?  This isn’t the first time she’s no-tipped a waitress while campaigning.

November 8, 2007 Posted by | Hillary, shameful | 5 Comments

Brits try to outlaw gay jokes

They must have officially run out of problems in Eurotrashland, so they’re turning to this:

The right to crack jokes or be rude about homosexuals could fall victim to new government laws to stamp out “homophobic” behaviour, Rowan Atkinson, the Blackadder star warned yesterday.

Atkinson, who mounted a successful campaign in 2004 to water down legislation aimed at criminalising expressions of religious hatred, has returned to the fray to defend the art of gay leg-pulling.

His concern is that Labour ministers are so obsessed with creating laws to stop people being rude about each other that they are putting in danger the right to free speech and, equally dear to his heart, the comedian’s craft.

In a letter to a newspaper he accused ministers of filling their legislative programme with measures that have “serious implications for freedom of speech, humour and creative expression”.

Atkinson was referring to measures in the Criminal Justice Bill, currently passing through Parliament, which could mean people who stir up hatred against homosexuals being put in prison for up to seven years.

He said the Government measures, which could be expanded to cover hatred against disabled or transgendered people, seemed to be “infinitely extendable”.

Atkinson added: “The devil, as always, will be in the detail but the casual ease which some people move from finding something offensive to wishing to declare it criminal – and are then able to find factions within government to aid their ambitions – is truly depressing.”

Free speech is cool…unless it is used to offend queers.  Then it sucks (pun intended).

Exit question: if the Euros were to outlaw Christian jokes or other derogatory remarks about Christian, don’t you think the howls of outrage would be louder than Barney Frank at a Chippendale’s show?

November 8, 2007 Posted by | Euros, gay, political correctness | 4 Comments

“Conservative” Dems in House vote for tax increase

Considering the Senate is likely to kill it, and if not, Bush will veto it, this is a curious move.  From Red State:

Blue Dog Democrats in the House are about to sacrifice themselves for nothing. The House is going to vote on the private equity tax increase and WaPo says the Dems are extremely divided on the issue.

Blue Dog Democrats, the pseudo-conservative Democrats, are the ones Pelosi has found to get the tax increase passed. That’s right, these supposedly fiscal conservative Democrats are going to vote for a tax increase.

And then the Senate will kill it.

Let’s go back to 1993 and Clinton’s BTU tax. The Blue Dogs voted for the Clinton tax increase only to see the Senate kill it. Then they met the voters and the voters rejected them. From the May 26, 1993, edition of the Denver Post:

The political problem is that the public has figured that out. Oklahoma Sen. David Boren has already opposed the energy tax – and when Boren’s “no” vote is added to the nine Republican opponents on the Senate Finance Committee, it is enough to kill the plan. That means Clinton’s tax plan will be dead on arrival in the Senate – if it gets that far. Meanwhile, House Democrats, who have to run again in 1994, are already wondering why they should anger voters just to let the Clinton tax plan die in the Senate.

Maybe history will repeat itself. 

Just as a leopard can’t change its spots, a Democrat can’t change his/her reflexive tendency to increase taxes.

November 8, 2007 Posted by | economic ignorance, taxes | Leave a Comment

Weather Channel founder: Global “warming” a “scam”

I wonder if Heidi Cullen will recommend that the guy responsible for her getting a paycheck lose his credentials, too.  Anywho, from Newsbusters:

If the founder of The Weather Channel spoke out strongly against the manmade global warming myth, might media members notice?

We’re going to find out the answer to that question soon, for John Coleman wrote an article published at ICECAP Wednesday that should certainly garner attention from press members — assuming journalism hasn’t been completely replaced by propagandist activism, that is.

It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.
[...]
I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious.

Let’s hope so, John; let’s hope so. 

As long as there is grant money to be obtained, there will always be some environmental “catastrophe” that warrants our attention.

November 8, 2007 Posted by | global warming | 2 Comments

Non-political, yet snarky, post

Check this out from the national security blabbermouth called the NYT:

About two years ago, a group of federal researchers reported that overweight people have a lower death rate than people who are normal weight, underweight or obese.

A lower death rate?  Granted, I’m not a “federal researcher”, but I’d hazard a guess that the death rate for overweight people is the same as for non-overweight people: 100%!

November 8, 2007 Posted by | non-political | Leave a Comment

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers