Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

“Religion of peace” and its skewed priorities

Recall the story of the murder of Canadian Muslim teenager Aqsa Parvez, slaughtered by her own father for her refusal to wear an Islamic garb.  What seems to be the concern of the Muslim community?  This is:

El-Sayyed said Islam teaches that women have the right to choose whether or not they want to wear the hijab.

But the Muslim leaders admitted a child who didn’t wear the hijab could bring shame to a family, and the parents could be viewed as failures in the community. 

Nice.  “Shame to the family” isn’t brought about by murder.  Nope, shame is brought about because that little parasitic whore wouldn’t wear a friggin’ scarf.  I mean, if the dad wasn’t allowed to smite the impudent little harlot, just what was he supposed to do, right?  The bloodthirsty camelhumper has a reputation, and if it means wasting his own flesh and blood so as not to appear soft in his fellow weirdbeards’ eyes, then so be it.

December 17, 2007 - Posted by | religion of peace, shameful

3 Comments »

  1. Islam IS NOT A RELIGION. It is a political movement even worse than communism. At least Communism is in a fashion answerable to someone. Islam is answerable to NO ONE. Imams are not voted on by the populace. Imams can when presented with 2 criminals, with the same circumstances, same evidence have one disembowled and savagely killed and the 2nd be given praise both backed up by a book of blaberings that are out of order and out of context.

    Comment by WMD_Maker | December 17, 2007

  2. Well I strongly disagree about Communism being answerable to someone.
    Communism and Islam are despotic only one is supposedly “religious” and the other is secular.
    I agree that Islam is not a religion but I still find communism to be just as tyrannical and totally absolute like Islam.

    Comment by Chilerkle | December 17, 2007

  3. Communism in the pure theoretical is based on cells that send representative members to larger cells that “control” the ruling central group. That central group still has sway in most cases over the figurehead. Where Islam has no central group governing policy that is why they end up with some groups mandating jihad as a personal spiritual struggle and others defining jihad as an outright physical war against non-members of the sect let alone the “religion”.

    Comment by WMD_Maker | December 17, 2007


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers