<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. CO2 emissions better than Kyoto signatories!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/</link>
	<description>Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chilerkle</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chilerkle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much like in the same vein I would use energy efficient light-bulbs not  because I wanna go green I wanna save green!
Though I wouldn&#039;t use &quot;environmentally friendly&quot; toilets!
My brother said his school had  what I would call &lt;b&gt;green toilets&lt;/b&gt; but they aren&#039;t very efficient which is why I don&#039;t consider these toilets to be environmentally friendly.

The question is do I want my environment to be friendly to humans or bacteria!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like in the same vein I would use energy efficient light-bulbs not  because I wanna go green I wanna save green!<br />
Though I wouldn&#8217;t use &#8220;environmentally friendly&#8221; toilets!<br />
My brother said his school had  what I would call <b>green toilets</b> but they aren&#8217;t very efficient which is why I don&#8217;t consider these toilets to be environmentally friendly.</p>
<p>The question is do I want my environment to be friendly to humans or bacteria!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opinionnation</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Opinionnation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 04:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sweet]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sweet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Surber &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brit complains that we don&#8217;t conserve</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Surber &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Brit complains that we don&#8217;t conserve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Crush Liberalism linked. Thanks. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Crush Liberalism linked. Thanks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Conservative Manifesto</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Conservative Manifesto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2007/12/20/us-co2-emissions-better-than-kyoto-signatories/#comment-3648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;U.S. CO2 Emissions Better than Kyoto Signatories&lt;/strong&gt;

Folks, you just couldn&#039;t make up this sort of irony if you tried.One
would think that countries that committed to the Kyoto treaty are doing
a better job of curtailing carbon emissions. One would also think that
the United States, the only...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>U.S. CO2 Emissions Better than Kyoto Signatories</strong></p>
<p>Folks, you just couldn&#8217;t make up this sort of irony if you tried.One<br />
would think that countries that committed to the Kyoto treaty are doing<br />
a better job of curtailing carbon emissions. One would also think that<br />
the United States, the only&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

