Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Thousands march, MSM ignores

Had it been a protest of a dozen Code Pinkos on Walter Reed, the MSM would have been all over that like Ted Kennedy on a tray of Jello shots.  Instead, the MSM largely yawns.  From Michelle Malkin:

1life1.jpg

If they were illegal alien activists, they’d get front-page coverage, multimedia packages, and prime time on TV airwaves.

If they were anti-war activists, they’d get front-page coverage, multimedia packages, and prime time on TV airwaves.

They are pro-life activists who marched today to mark the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

You’ll be lucky to see photos like the one above buried somewhere in the back of your newspaper.

I don’t care what your view of abortion is, but you can’t deny that the double standard is quite obvious.

Nope…no liberal media bias!

January 22, 2008 - Posted by crushliberalism | abortion, hypocrisy, media bias

3 Comments »

  1. The abortion argument always drums up lots of emotion. Take this exchange for example. Synopsis: a liberal proclaims that there shouldn’t even be an argument about it because, “Abortion is a distraction. Most Americans and Republicans are pro-choice. The only reason Republicans pols push it is because they are trying to rev up their conservative base.”

    Of course, this most-declarative statement doesn’t take into account the fact that other opinions exist. The author of this site took that liberal to task in the comments section (of which there were many) and, to no surprise, the liberal completely avoided it. It prompted me to revisit the subject. Jonathan had a great point:

    “If you genuinely believe that abortion is NOT the murdering of babies, then your position is believable. However, we don’t want to put words in your mouth, so please say it for yourself if you truly believe it: ‘I do not think that abortion is the killing of innocent life. I do not believe that babies are killed during an abortion.’ Go ahead, say it.”

    Take a wild guess at whether or not the liberal was able to say it. As usual when debating lock-step liberals, the argument gets out of hand and off the topic quickly. That’s when the insults usually start flying and no points can be made or understood.

    Comment by TheBad | January 22, 2008

  2. You would have thought that with that many people in one place they would have been bitching about global warming at that location.

    Comment by WMD_Maker | January 23, 2008

  3. Bad, I had almost forgotten about that conversation. You’re right, Hugo never answered the question. It’s a simple question, really: do you believe it, yes or no? It’s a shame he got all John Kerry on us like that!

    Comment by crushliberalism | January 23, 2008


Leave a comment

« Previous | Next »