<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thousands march, MSM ignores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/</link>
	<description>Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crushliberalism</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crushliberalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/#comment-4764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad, I had almost forgotten about that conversation.  You&#039;re right, Hugo never answered the question.  It&#039;s a simple question, really: do you believe it, yes or no?  It&#039;s a shame he got all John Kerry on us like that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad, I had almost forgotten about that conversation.  You&#8217;re right, Hugo never answered the question.  It&#8217;s a simple question, really: do you believe it, yes or no?  It&#8217;s a shame he got all John Kerry on us like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WMD_Maker</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WMD_Maker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/#comment-4763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You would have thought that with that many people in one place they would have been bitching about global warming at that location.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would have thought that with that many people in one place they would have been bitching about global warming at that location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBad</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/2008/01/22/thousands-march-msm-ignores/#comment-4761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The abortion argument always drums up lots of emotion.  Take &lt;a href=&quot;http://rantsandrefinements.blogspot.com/2007/07/take-on-hugo-part-i.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this exchange&lt;/a&gt; for example.  Synopsis: a liberal proclaims that there shouldn’t even be an argument about it because, &lt;i&gt;“Abortion is a distraction. Most Americans and Republicans are pro-choice. The only reason Republicans pols push it is because they are trying to rev up their conservative base.”&lt;/i&gt;

Of course, this most-declarative statement doesn’t take into account the fact that other opinions exist.  The author of this site took that liberal to task in the comments section (of which there were many) and, to no surprise, the liberal completely avoided it.  It prompted me to &lt;a href=&quot;http://rantsandrefinements.blogspot.com/2007/07/take-on-hugo-part-i-revisited.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;revisit the subject&lt;/a&gt;.  Jonathan had a great point:

&lt;i&gt;“If you genuinely believe that abortion is NOT the murdering of babies, then your position is believable. However, we don’t want to put words in your mouth, so please say it for yourself if you truly believe it: ‘I do not think that abortion is the killing of innocent life. I do not believe that babies are killed during an abortion.’ Go ahead, say it.”&lt;/i&gt;

Take a wild guess at whether or not the liberal was able to say it.  As usual when debating lock-step liberals, the argument gets out of hand and off the topic quickly.  That’s when the insults usually start flying and no points can be made or understood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The abortion argument always drums up lots of emotion.  Take <a href="http://rantsandrefinements.blogspot.com/2007/07/take-on-hugo-part-i.html" rel="nofollow">this exchange</a> for example.  Synopsis: a liberal proclaims that there shouldn’t even be an argument about it because, <i>“Abortion is a distraction. Most Americans and Republicans are pro-choice. The only reason Republicans pols push it is because they are trying to rev up their conservative base.”</i></p>
<p>Of course, this most-declarative statement doesn’t take into account the fact that other opinions exist.  The author of this site took that liberal to task in the comments section (of which there were many) and, to no surprise, the liberal completely avoided it.  It prompted me to <a href="http://rantsandrefinements.blogspot.com/2007/07/take-on-hugo-part-i-revisited.html" rel="nofollow">revisit the subject</a>.  Jonathan had a great point:</p>
<p><i>“If you genuinely believe that abortion is NOT the murdering of babies, then your position is believable. However, we don’t want to put words in your mouth, so please say it for yourself if you truly believe it: ‘I do not think that abortion is the killing of innocent life. I do not believe that babies are killed during an abortion.’ Go ahead, say it.”</i></p>
<p>Take a wild guess at whether or not the liberal was able to say it.  As usual when debating lock-step liberals, the argument gets out of hand and off the topic quickly.  That’s when the insults usually start flying and no points can be made or understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

