Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Jimmy Carter says Jesus screwed up by not making pact with Satan

Not only does Jimmy the Dhimmi like to coddle evil maniacal dictators, he apparently would have preferred Satan to be coddled, too.  To think that this senile, egocentric buffoon was once the president!

From the American Spectator:

APPROPRIATELY ENOUGH, to Carter’s mind, the biggest trade-off of the Crucifixion may have been gaining eternal salvation while losing a potentially great bureaucratic overlord. During a meditation on the temptation of Christ, Carter muses over the attractiveness of Satan’s offer to allow Christ to rule the world if he rejected God:

What a wonderful and benevolent government Jesus could have set up. How exemplary justice would have been. Maybe there would have been Habitat projects all over Israel for anyone who needed a home. And the proud, the rich, and the powerful could not have dominated their fellow citizens…As a twentieth-century governor and president I would have had a perfect pattern to follow. I could have pointed to the Bible and told other government leaders, “This is what Jesus did 2000 years ago in government. Why don’t we do the same?”

That Carter assumes, first, he would be a worthy successor to Christ in political office — what, Jesus returns to implement…term limits? — and, second, that the Messiah would spend his post-presidency years doing precisely as Carter did — building Habitat for Humanity homes, apparently — tells you everything you need to know about the Man from Plains’ outlook on this world and the next. 

Go ahead, you Carter defenders: try your best with this one!

February 4, 2008 Posted by | Carter, dhimmitude | 8 Comments

Hillary cries again

With polls showing her once insurmountable lead having evaporated, Her Highness decided to pull a New Hampshire cryjob again to see if the results would be similar.  From CT:

Sen. Hillary Clinton teared up this morning at an event at the Yale Child Study Center, where she worked while in law school in the early 1970s.

A doctor, who was introducing Clinton, began to choke up, leading Clinton’s eyes to fill with tears, which she wiped out of her left eye. At the time, the doctor was saying how proud he was that sheepskin-coat, bell-bottom-wearing young woman he met in 1972 was now running for president.

“Well, I said I would not tear up; already we’re not exactly on the path,” Clinton said with emotion after the introduction. 

Hey, now there’s an idea for a new campaign slogan: “Vote for Hillary, because she’ll cry if you don’t!”

February 4, 2008 Posted by | Hillary, shameful | 3 Comments

MS politicians to prohibit restaurants from serving obese customers

Mississippi must have officially run out of problems to solve.  That is fantastic news, because that must mean they’ve finally stopped hovering around the bottom of the nation in education.  Anywho, the brilliant minds in the Magnolia State have crafted a bipartisan bill that will force restaurants to stop serving obese patrons.

Apparently, the bill is deader than Ted Kennedy’s liver.  I have to wonder, though: why stop at restaurants?

I mean, if the goal is to help curb obesity by telling businesses they can’t serve obese folks, then why not extend that ban to grocers and convenience stores as well?  Can’t obese men and women go to Publix and buy a case of Ho-Ho’s just as easily as they can go to Mickey D’s and buy a few Big Macs?

Therefore, why place such a burden on restaurants but not on other food vendors?  After all, if the obese can’t eat, they can’t get bigger, right?  Sure, they’ll starve to death, but look at the bright side: they’ll be thin when they die!

This bill is proof that Big Government do-gooders are found in both parties.

February 4, 2008 Posted by | big government | 4 Comments

Not gonna vote if McCain gets nomination?

One thing I’ve been clear on is that if Juan McAmnesty gets the GOP nomination, I will still go to the polls and vote, even though I’m not positive I’ll vote for him.  If you’re thinking about boycotting the polls with McCain as the Republican nominee, Ace asks you to consider the ramifications:

If you really are serious about sitting out the Presidential election if McCain gets the nomination, that is one thing. But consider the down ticket consequences if you don’t even show up. Senate, Congressional and other key races may be impacted.

One example comes from Minnesota, where this poll now has Al Franken leading Norm Coleman. Now, the poll oversampled Democrats, where 52% of those sampled were Dems, but this should be a wake up call.

Senator. Al. F##king. Franken.

Think about that the next time you say you’ll be golfing in Election Day. 

Stewart Smalley wants to bodyslam his way into the Senate, and those MN moonbats are leaning towards putting him there.  Wow…just “wow”!

February 4, 2008 Posted by | McCain, moonbats | 5 Comments

Obama is THE most liberal Senator

I always get a kick out of seeing Barry O spout his bovine feces about “not red, not blue, but purple states” and finding “common ground” with ideological opponents.  Why do I find it amusing?  Because he’s so damned dishonest, that’s why!

From National Journal:

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal’s 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., the other front-runner in the Democratic presidential race, also shifted to the left last year. She ranked as the 16th-most-liberal senator in the 2007 ratings, a computer-assisted analysis that used 99 key Senate votes, selected by NJ reporters and editors, to place every senator on a liberal-to-conservative scale in each of three issue categories. In 2006, Clinton was the 32nd-most-liberal senator.

Dude is more liberal than Her Highness! I mean, the guy sure talks a mean game about “uniting” and “considering opposing points of view”, but his record shows that he never deviates from the party line, thus proving his mantra about compromise to be a load of crap.  The guy’s about as genuine as Pamela Anderson’s rack.

February 4, 2008 Posted by | big government, Obama | 2 Comments

Top 10 miserable cities are liberal

Forbes has a Top 10 Most Miserable Cities list.  Here they are:

1. Detroit, MI

2. Stockton, CA

3. Flint, MI

4. New York City

5. Philadelphia, PA

6. Chicago, IL

7. Los Angeles, CA

8. Modesto, CA

9. Charlotte, NC

10. Providence, RI 

Notice one thing in common?  They’re all predominantly Big Government liberal cities, and with the exception of NC, the other nine states are liberal states.  No wonder the left wants those of us in normal America to adopt their failed policies: misery loves company.

February 4, 2008 Posted by | big government | 4 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers