Comments on: NYT hit piece on McCain, silent on Huma

By: Ludwig Van Beethoven

Ludwig Van Beethoven — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:22:28 +0000

Well I must say that if Hillary is bumping donuts with Huma Abedin, then she has much better taste in women than Bill ever had.

By: ManicNole

ManicNole — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:14:56 +0000

I know this is a “friend-of-a-friend” type story, but I believe my source to be rather believable.

A friend of mine works in federal law enforcement. He’s done some presidential / politician security in the past. He also spent about 3 months in training last summer with various other federal law enforcement entities. He knows several Secret Service agents.

As he tells it, he has heard story after personal story, especially from those who were part of the Secret Service during the Clinton Administration, about not only having to provide cover and diversion for Bill’s frequent and varied sexual encounters, but just about as much for Hildabeasts sexual trysts with women.

Now in general, I don’t care if her and Janet Reno dressed up as school girls and played Stanley Steamer on each other’s carpets, but it just shows that she will forever try to live a lie in an attempt to sate her thirst for power.

By: crushliberalism

crushliberalism — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:10:24 +0000

Mr. Bad, those results are indeed proof that there is NO liberal media bias!

(/sarcasm off)

By: TheBad

TheBad — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:22:46 +0000

As I have noted today on my site, I find the amount of coverage to be very interesting. A Google search of McCain + Iseman garnered 1,171 results with over 5,000 sub-results. In contrast, an almost month-old NYT story about Bill Clinton, Frank Giustra and good old-fashioned payola – with actual proof – finds much less press interest. The Google search for Clinton + Giustra finds a paltry 84 results, most of which are in defense of the former Hard-On-In-Chief. No liberal bias here – nothing to see – these aren’t the droids you’re looking for – move along.

By: Reverse_Vampyr

Reverse_Vampyr — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:00:33 +0000

And to think, journalists blast bloggers for publishing posts without sources! Pot, meet kettle.

Personally, I think the NYT just wants to morph McCain into Clinton, complete with his own bimbo eruption (I created a funny Photoshop image to match).

By: tnjack

tnjack — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:16:06 +0000

I hope McCain finally learns a lesson from this Times article. The Times was endorsing him when he was running against Thompson and Romney and even said he had the nomination sewn up. But now that it looks like McCain has the nomination the Times can show their true colors. You can’t trust Liberals! I even heard Rush say that a snake is a snake and a tiger is a tiger and the Times is the Times!

By: PabloD

PabloD — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:07:30 +0000

Well, I was having a perfectly nice breakfast, and then I read the phrase “Huma and the Hildebeast have been bumping donuts for a while now.” It’s going to take a fair amount of scotch tonight to erase that image…