Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Ramifications of taxing the rich

The rich don’t get that way by being stupid.  From QandO:

They may be rich, but they’re not dumb:

“When California faced a Mount Everest-sized $14 billion deficit in 2003, one of the major causes for the red ink was the stampede of millionaire households from the state,” says a report called “Rich States, Poor States” by economists Arthur Laffer and Stephen Moore. “Out of the 25,000 or so seven-figure-income families, more than 5,000 left in the early 2000s, and the loss of their tax payments accounted for about half the budget hole.”

They’re not the only ones leaving either. The report, published by the American Legislative Exchange Council points out that not all jobs are leaving the US, but many, if not most lost jobs simply move to other states.

“States are in direct competition with each other for human capital and business investment. State governments that think they can attract jobs and people, and grow their economies, by taxing their citizens at a higher rate than their neighbors are sadly mistaken,” said Democratic Arkansas state Sen. Steve Faris, ALEC’s 2008 national chairman. “Legislators should take a close look at where their state ranks in this book and use it as a tool to help them improve.”

In the meantime, for every loser, there’s a winner:

According to the findings, a record 8 million Americans moved from one state to another in 2006, revealing which states have the most dynamic and desirable economies and which are “has-been” states, according to Laffer and Moore.

And they moved for pretty obvious reasons:

The report provides economic competitiveness rankings for all 50 states based on 16 policy variables with a proven effect on the migration of people and investment capital in and out of states. States with the lowest tax, spending, and regulatory burdens win the competitiveness contest. These are primarily in the South and Southwest regions of the nation.

Huh. Sounds very similar to the reasons given for the British brain drain I noted here

States like CA have yet to learn their lesson, though, and their low-tax neighbors like NV have reaped the benefits of their economic ignorance.

Advertisement

February 21, 2008 - Posted by | California, economic ignorance, taxes

3 Comments »

  1. Yeah but they’re not patriotic for not willing to “pay their fair share” – which is always increasing BTW.

    Comment by FreedomLover | February 21, 2008

  2. “States like CA have yet to learn their lesson, though…”

    In Californistan, even the Republicans are liberal – few as they might be. As such, don’t hold your breath for a lesson learned. A main liberal tenet is that the most successful in America should be ashamed for how much more they have than the least successful. Ergo, they will always be over-taxed.

    Comment by TheBad | February 21, 2008

  3. See you are all missing the real point. We need to tax the rich to help the poor feel better about themselves. See if we tax the rich, then they (who employ the majority of non-rich people) will have to cut labor to cut costs and that will force more unemployment and more poor people will ensue. Then the current nearly non-existent unemployed will be joined by an influx of new poor unemployed people and it will for a community so that the poor will have someone that sympathaizes with them and understands them and then we will finally have harmony. Oh Praise Allah, er…I mean Obama.

    Comment by mklasing | February 22, 2008


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers