Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Osamabama thinks families making $75k are wealthy and need to pay more

He loves him some tax money…just don’t call him a liberal for it, though, m’kay?  From the LAT blog:

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama went after the “We’re not paying enough taxes to the government” vote today during a television interview in New York.

First, he said the Bush tax cuts ought to die. He likes that top marginal rate of 39%. Although the non-partisan National Journal recently declared him the most liberal of the 100 senators, Obama denied being a “wild-eyed liberal,” which wasn’t what the Journal called him, but it sounds good on TV where everything moves by so quickly.

Maria Bartiromo on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” asked, “Who should pay more and who should pay less?” Predictably, the politician chose to talk about who would benefit from his higher tax plan, not who would get socked the hardest. But from his answers it sounds like the “wealthy” in his mind are those making more than $75,000.

“I would not increase taxes for middle class Americans and in fact I want to….

provide a tax cut for people who are making $75,000 a year or less,” he said. “For those folks, I want an offset on the payroll tax that would be worth as much as $1,000 for a family.

“Senior citizens who are bringing in less than $50,000 a year in income, I don’t want them to have to pay income tax on their Social Security. And as part of my overall approach to housing, I actually want to provide an additional 10 percent mortgage deduction, a credit, mortgage interest credit, for those who currently don’t itemize.”

“Why raise taxes at all in an economic slowdown?” Bartiromo asked. “Isn’t that going to put a further strain on people?”

“Well, look,” said Obama, “there’s no doubt that anything I do is going to be premised on what the economic situation is when I take office.”

Obama said, “I’m going to be sworn in in January — we don’t know what the economy’s going to look like at that point.”

He was asked about the liberal tag. “I believe in capitalism and I want to do what works,” the senator replied. ” But what I want to make sure of is it works for all America and not just a small sliver of America.”

“Obama’s completely disingenuous dodge on whether he would raise taxes during a time of economic slowdown is belied by his vote earlier this month,” said Alex Conant, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee. “Obama’s claims to the contrary, his votes to raise taxes on people earning as little as $31,850 are straight from the Democrats’ tax-and-spend playbook.”

Raise taxes in an economic slowdown…friggin’ brilliant, Osamabama.

March 28, 2008 - Posted by | economic ignorance, Obama, taxes

7 Comments »

  1. Hillary’s got the same tax plan.
    “Let’s screw the working people and producers of the country to give handouts to the non-working, non-producers”.
    It just fries me!!! Too bad the people of this country don’t have the guts to band together and say ENOUGH and vote all these blood thirsty idiots out of office!

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | March 28, 2008

  2. Great post. Just imagine a wold in which he takes 11% of GDP and puts it in the government’s hands. That will be the true healthcare crisis. If we cant provide healthcare for our soldiers, how will we do it for the entire country.

    Comment by Fr. J. | March 28, 2008

  3. Raise taxes in an economic slowdown…friggin’ brilliant, Osamabama.

    But it worked for President Hoover…

    uhhh…never mind…my bad :)

    Comment by East Coast Libertarian | March 28, 2008

  4. Bush proved that tax CUTS work. So whatever was good for Bush can’t be good for America according to the dems.

    Comment by tnjack | March 28, 2008

  5. “And as part of my overall approach to housing, I actually want to provide an additional 10 percent mortgage deduction, a credit, mortgage interest credit, for those who currently don’t itemize.”

    Chaps my @ss that he wants to give a mortgage deduction to those that can’t itemize. If you’re making less than $75K and you HAVE a mortgage, I guarantee that you CAN itemize. I wish he’d just be honest and call it a tax reduction for the lower middle-class/poor that AREN’T buing a home or are too stupid to figure out taxes if they are. Alas, “honesty” and politicians don’t mix well, do they?

    Comment by Submariner | March 28, 2008

  6. Actually, when you bust out all the numbers, his plan is a tax increase for everyone – except, of course, the ones who already pay nothing.

    Comment by TheBad | March 28, 2008

  7. The tax cuts that will be cancelled for next year or so the Democrats claim will remove the tax cut for the rich. The new definition of rich is now 30K. Because taxes will increase on everyone who makes 30K or more. SO I think you have the number wrong on who is rich. I make it in both categories of rich. Discloser required by Democrat Law so my thoughts will not count.

    Comment by danfinrud | March 30, 2008


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers