Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Rev. Wright just won’t shut up!

Preach on, Brother Moonbat!  The more you open up that construction accident known as your cakehole, I get giddier than Ellen DeGeneres at an Indigo Girls concert!

First, he tells us what most of us already knew (and what I had already said): Obama agrees with him, but has to pretend like he doesn’t (which shoots that whole “sincerity” snake oil O’s been peddling all to hell).

Then, not only does he not renounce his nutty “we had 9/11 coming to us” poison, he orders a double shot.

Now (I can’t say “finally”, because I don’t think he’s nearly done flapping his gums yet), we get some of his “Condemnation of ‘God damn America’ = attacking the black church” mantra that will resonate with the race hustlers of the left…which, judging by the reaction of the National Press Club, that number is quite high.

But hey…Barry O can no more disown him than he can his own family, right?

Of course, CNN “journalist” Roland Martin (not to be confused with the bass angler) abandons all pretense of objectivity engages in some embarrassing #ss-kissing to the Cardinal of Kookville.

Pastor Pinko may finally be able to do what Her Highness and Juan McLame have thus far been unable to do: sink the Obamessiah’s campaign.  Time will tell, of course, but polls are beginning to turn against Obama and in the Hildebitch’s direction.

April 28, 2008 Posted by | bigotry, media bias, moonbats, Obama | Leave a Comment

Supreme Court: Yes, you actually have to prove you’re eligible to vote!

The left fought this tooth and nail, since it does stymie their efforts to perpetuate vote fraud.  However, they are a resilient bunch, so I’m sure they’ll figure out a way to overcome this obstacle.  If only they’d put in half as much effort at getting a job as they do in trying to cheat at the ballot box, they’d likely be more successful in life.  Anywho, from MSNBC:

The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws.

In a splintered 6-3 ruling, the court upheld Indiana’s strict photo ID requirement, which Democrats and civil rights groups said would deter poor, older and minority voters from casting ballots. Its backers said it was needed to prevent fraud.
…
The law “is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting ‘the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,’” Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy. Stevens was a dissenter in Bush v. Gore in 2000.
…
Indiana provides IDs free of charge to the poor and allows voters who lack photo ID to cast a provisional ballot and then show up within 10 days at their county courthouse to produce identification or otherwise attest to their identity.

Stevens said these provisions also help reduce the burden on people who lack driver licenses.

Stevens concurred with the common sense segment of the SCOTUS?  OK, who found some photos of Stevens in compromising positions with livestock?  Fess up, you wingnuts!  :D

Isn’t this ruling just sheer lunacy?  Today, voting precincts are verifying voter eligibility.  Tomorrow, they’ll probably do someting barbaric like disenfranchising the dead and the pet population! For those of you on the left, this entire paragraph was sarcasm.

It’s telling that Indiana actually will provide free ID for those who don’t have one, in order to help them vote, thus alleviating the biggest complaint that the left had about the law…and that still wasn’t good enough for them. It’s obvious that the left is all about vote fraud and they knew this law would make their jobs of commiting vote fraud that much tougher.

April 28, 2008 Posted by | Supreme Court, vote fraud | 5 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers