Crush Liberalism

16 Comments »

1. David O’Brien from County Cork, Ireland writes:

   ‘We in Ireland cannot figure why you Americans are even bothering to
   hold a presidential election this year. “On one side, you have a
   cackling bitch who is a lawyer, married to a disbarred lawyer,
   running against a lawyer who is married to a lawyer bitch who is not proud of her country.”

   “On the other side, you have a war hero who loves his country, is
   married to a good-looking woman with big tits who owns a beer
   distributorship worth 100 million dollars.”

   “I say, is there really a contest here?”

   Comment by Lee | June 9, 2008

2. @ Lee – Never thought of it that way. X-D

   Found this off of Google news. It’s by a commenter on a story from some CBS affiliate talking about whether or not Hilary “damaged the glass ceiling” (in reference to the Obama endorsement speech she gave):

   “Obama stole his candidacy just as he stole it when he got elected as senator.
   It is clear that there are nefarious players behind the scenes for Obama. How is it he could have so many criminal and fanatical connections and still be in the running? I am convinced that those of the Middle East who wish to destroy this nation have found a way to do it from the inside. We as Americans all know the power of money, and who has more of it than those of the Middle East. Somehow they have jerry rigged the media to make Obama a Teflon Obama and now they are playing with the economy such as raising the gas prices so as to put the republican administration in a bad light. It is the Trojan horse again and most Americans seem too stupid to recognize it.”

   NEW FROM BLAM-O! TEFLON NO-STICK OBAMA! PERFECT FOR POACHED EGGS AND BACON! X-D

   Comment by Ed B. | June 9, 2008

3. I have another theory. Once the Arab American is elected president the Dems will suddenly do an about face and INSIST on drilling in previously “off-limits” areas and the gas prices will be cut in half. Thus the people will love the new messiah and the dems will be in power forevermore.

   Comment by tnjack | June 9, 2008

4. Except that they will tax it back into the same price as now

   Comment by WMD_Maker | June 9, 2008

5. HOW LONG DOES THE USA HAVE?

   The sad thing about it, you can see it coming.
   About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution
   in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of
   Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some
   2000 years earlier:

   ‘A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a
   permanent form of government.’
   ‘A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover
   they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.’
   ‘From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who
   promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that
   every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is
   always followed by a dictatorship.’
   ‘The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations from the beginning of
   history, has been about 200 years’
   ‘During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the
   following sequence:

   1. From bondage to spiritual faith;
   2. From spiritual faith to great courage;
   3. From courage to liberty;
   4. From liberty to abundance;
   5. From abundance to complacency;
   6. From complacency to apathy;
   7. From apathy to dependence;
   8. From dependence back into bondage’

   Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St . Paul,
   Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000
   Presidential election:

   Number of States won by:
   Gore: 19
   Bush: 29

   Square miles of land won by:
   Gore: 580,000
   Bush: 2,427,000

   Population of counties won by:
   Gore: 127 million
   Bush: 143 million

   Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
   Gore: 13.2
   Bush: 2.1

   Professor Olson adds: ‘In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was
   mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country.
   Gore’s territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in
   government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
   welfare…’Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
   complacency and apathy’ phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of democracy,
   with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reached
   the ‘governmental dependency’ phase.

   If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal
   invaders called illegal and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in
   fewer than five years.

   Most of us grew up with the saying ‘history always repeats itself.’ The
   American people really need to think seriously about WHO they will be voting
   for.

   Comment by Lee | June 9, 2008

6. wow, and you lot say the democrats are wearing the tinfoil hats.

   Comment by andrew | June 10, 2008

7. Andrew, have you ever tried trolling while sober?

   Comment by Lee | June 10, 2008

8. In typical lib fashion, he doesn’t address the post. Just insult and move on.

   Lame.

   BTW Lee, I liked your comment so much that I posted it on my blog. I’ll remove it if you want me to.

   I’m just glad I don’t have any mudkitty’s on my blog.

   Comment by Frznagn | June 10, 2008

9. address the post? do I really need to dignify the theory that Brarack Obama is an Al Qaeda spy? the fact that you think this is an idea that’s even remotely plausable speaks volumes about your stupidity. It’s also worth pointing out that every time I make a good point on this idiot-orgy of a website, i get an insult in return without even a pathetic attempt to refute my logic. and yet when i return the favor on ONE occasion to the most stupid among stupid theories, I get called out for “insulting and moving on” in “typical liberal fasion”. I thought it was just the ELECTED republicans who were hypocrites.

   and to answer Lee’s question: no, I need a glass or two of Brandy to be able to deal with you children with even as little patience as I muster.

   Comment by andrew | June 10, 2008

10. Hey andrew, try opening your eyes and reading next time.

    Dude rants.

    I make fun of him.

    Where in that post does it say “DOoD he’s like TOTALLy RIGHT! OBAMA Zz TEH AntICHRIST!!!!!11 DER’s A SPY SAPPIN MY SENTRY!!!!!!!”

    Next time please think before you post.

    Comment by Ed B. | June 10, 2008

11. if you want people to understand you, kid, you shouldn’t encode your point in friggin 1337$p34k. but fine, redirect my previous comments and it also applies to the guy who was siting statistics to imply that people who vote Dem could destroy this country in five years, and that fiscal irresponsablity is a liberal trait (bush disproves this notion), or that somehow, it’s important that Bush won about four times the LAND AREA compared to Gore in 2000.

    Comment by andrew | June 10, 2008

12. What part of “NEW FROM BLAM-O! TEFLON NO-STICK OBAMA! PERFECT FOR POACHED EGGS AND BACON! X-D”

    Is leetspeak? Its pretty black-and-white if you ask me.

    Comment by Ed B. | June 10, 2008

13. andrew, you must put forth logic before it can be refuted. I don’t think you’ve hit the mark yet sporto.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | June 10, 2008

14. Frznagn, you are welcome to it, I didn’t write it, just passed it on. We needed something to stir stuff up while Crush was off.

    Comment by Lee | June 10, 2008

15. “do I really need to dignify the theory that Brarack Obama is an Al Qaeda spy?”

    Yes.

    “the fact that you think this is an idea that’s even remotely plausable speaks volumes about your stupidity.”

    And it shows how naive you are too. Talk to your fellow libs about the “brown note” and then talk to me about stupidity.

    “I get called out for “insulting and moving on” in “typical liberal fasion”.”

    Well, you did. Can you deny it? Thought so.

    “I thought it was just the ELECTED republicans who were hypocrites.”

    No, it’s the unelected democrats too.

    If this is too difficult for you to understand, I can dumb it down for you.

    Comment by frznagn | June 10, 2008

16. “I can dumb it down for you”

    How much “dumber down” can it get before its just jibberish?

    Comment by WMD_Maker | June 11, 2008

« Previous | Next »

Site info

Crush Liberalism
Theme: Andreas04 by Andreas Viklund. Blog at WordPress.com.