Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

9th Circus Chief Justice a porndog?

Well, this would certainly explain a lot about the depravity exhibited by that sham of a court, wouldn’t it?  How’s this for irony?

One of the highest-ranking federal judges in the United States, who is currently presiding over an obscenity trial in Los Angeles, has maintained a publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos.

Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, acknowledged in an interview with The Times that he had posted the materials, which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal. Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as “funny.”

Kozinski, 57, said that he thought the site was for his private storage and that he was not aware the images could be seen by the public, although he also said he had shared some material on the site with friends. After the interview Tuesday evening, he blocked public access to the site. …

In all fairness, dude is a Reagan appointee, but when someone needs a whackin’, a whackin’ they shall get.  At any rate, I wonder if his affinity for such “material” will result in him being recused from presiding over the L.A. obscene p0rn case.

Advertisement

June 13, 2008 - Posted by | California, irony, judiciary

2 Comments »

  1. I’m failing to see the major problem here. OK, certainly it was less-than-smart to be posting sexual content to the web, regardless of whether he thought others could see it or not, when he is presiding over an obscenity trial. However, it sounds like he has perfectly legal content for adults.

    In contrast, the trial which he was presiding over was the prosecution of a pornographer making bestiality films. I’m pretty sure that bestiality is a crime – even in California. Conversely, a naked woman painted to look like a cow is not. A “half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal” is not a crime either (depending on the meaning of “cavorting”). It’s in bad taste and pretty disgusting, but I think there is a clear and distinct line here.

    “Sen. Dianne Feinstein (d-Calif.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, expressed concern about Kozinski’s Web site.

    “‘If this is true, this is unacceptable behavior for a federal court judge,’ she said in a statement.”

    It’s not so much that I defend this judge – he made a poor choice. As a result, his career is forever damaged. I think what gets my gord are the liberals feigning disgust in their usual hypocritical manner. While Feinstein bloats about “unacceptable behavior”, we might want to remember that, in the impeachment of Bill Clinton – a man who perjured himself and obstructed justice – Feinstein was less than concerned about the “unacceptable behavior” for a President and voted “Not Guilty” on both charges.

    Comment by TheBad | June 13, 2008

  2. “The Bad said,

    Liberals feigning disgust in their usual hypocritical manner”

    Why am I not surprised the left always takes a position out of convenience rather than principle.

    Comment by Chilerkle | June 15, 2008


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

« Previous | Next »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers