Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

World Court tries again to usurp American sovereignty

The World Court ruled in 2004 that the U.S. could not execute Mexican nationals who had been convicted in Texas (for gang-rape and murder of two teenage girls) and sentenced to die.

Anywho, the lame open-borders administration attempted to get Texas to abide by the overreaching World Court, and Texas told Bush to go to Hell.  The case made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, whereby a 6-3 ruling in favor of common sense and national sovereignty was handed down.  SCOTUS said that the World Court had NO authority to intervene in the American legal system and that the president did NOT have the power to order Texas to abide by the World Court’s ruling.

Well, old habits die hard, because the World Court is trying to meddle againDetails:

The World Court ordered the United States on Wednesday to do all it could to halt the imminent executions of five Mexicans until the court makes a final judgment in a dispute over suspects’ rights.

The row, which has strained relations between the neighbors, centers on the fact that the United States failed to inform 51 of its citizens sentenced to die in U.S. jails of their right to consular assistance.

One of the five Mexicans on death row, Jose Medellin, is due to die on August 5 in Texas.

In 2004, the World Court ruled in favor of Mexico, finding the United States had violated international law, and ordered it to review the 51 cases to see whether the lack of consular assistance had prejudiced the outcome of their trials.

A year later, U.S. President George W. Bush ordered Texas to review Medellin’s case but the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in March that Bush had no authority to do so, leading Texas to schedule Medellin’s execution for August.

“The court indicates that the United States of America shall take all measures necessary to ensure that five Mexican nationals are not executed pending its final judgment,” Judge Rosalyn Higgins said.

Mexico has asked the World Court or International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an interpretation of its 2004 ruling, given U.S. assertions that its federal states have a large degree of legal autonomy and it .cannot compel them to review the cases

Will the open-border amigos of Jorgé W. Bush in the administration pay attention to OUR court this time, or will they try to ignore OUR court to placate the UN’s court?

Advertisement

July 17, 2008 - Posted by | big government, Mexico, United Nations

4 Comments »

  1. This is such BS. There is a thing called VENUE and the World Court has no jurisdiction here. The law of THIS land has spoken and the thugs deserve to fry! I wish Bush would stop pandering to Mexico. They’ve proven time and again they are no friend of the US.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | July 17, 2008

  2. Don’t worry, soon the Netherlands will be overrun with jihadists and the judges at the World Court will be seeking to file an appeal from their own beheadings on the grounds that they were carried out without due process and were cruel (but perhaps not unusual).

    Comment by PabloD | July 17, 2008

  3. [...] illegal immigration at 7:35 am by crushliberalism Recall the story of how the UN’s World Court tried to usurp American sovereignty and stop the execution of criminal alien Jose Medellin, despite the obvious fact that the World [...]

    Pingback by Texas adds finality to World Court saga « Crush Liberalism | August 6, 2008

  4. Tell the world kangaroo court to BUTT OUT and GO TO H***

    Comment by SPURWING PLOVER | April 8, 2011


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers