Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

“Proved: There is no climate crisis”

That’s the title of a report by the Science and Public Policy Institute, a title that merely confirms what we’ve known all along.  Excerpt:

Mathematical proof that there is no “climate crisis” appears today in a major, peer-reviewed paper in Physics and Society, a learned journal of the 10,000-strong American Physical Society, SPPI reports.

Christopher Monckton, who once advised Margaret Thatcher, demonstrates via 30 equations that computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is “climate sensitivity” (temperature increase in response to greenhouse-gas increase), resulting in a 500-2000% overstatement of CO2’s effect on temperature in the IPCC’s latest climate assessment report, published in 2007.

Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered [http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/index.cfm] demonstrates that later this century a doubling of the concentration of CO2 compared with pre-industrial levels will increase global mean surface temperature not by the 6 °F predicted by the IPCC but, harmlessly, by little more than 1 °F. …

Gore and his cronies on the IPCC won their Nobel “Peace” Prize under fraudulent circumstances.  Normally, a little anti-Americanism is enough to win that formerly prestigious award.  He could have done like Jimmah and merely spouted a little anti-American drivel, and saved himself the trouble of peddling discredited junk science fads.

July 18, 2008 - Posted by crushliberalism | global warming

3 Comments »

  1. The junk science fraud that’s been perpetrated on the American people has made Algore a very wealthy man.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | July 18, 2008

  2. Hopefully, The Goreacle™ will be tarred and feathered, then banished from the global village.

    Comment by Henry | July 18, 2008

  3. Unfortunately, this is way too little and way too late. Global Warming Hoax has a following. It has seeped into our media, our collective conscience, and most salient – into our legislation. In our time we are still fighting the nonsense of zealots attempting to teach creationism in science class. While you can simultaneously be religious (or spiritual if you prefer) and believe in the science of evolution, this notion seems to get lost in the heated secular versus religious aspects of the debate.

    End result: we’re still arguing whether or not to teach creationism is science class. How long will it take humanity to purge something like Global Warming Hoax – a non-religious religion?

    Comment by TheBad | July 18, 2008


Leave a comment