<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laugher of the day: MSM favors&#8230;McCain!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushliberalism.com/2008/07/29/laugher-of-the-day-msm-favorsmccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/07/29/laugher-of-the-day-msm-favorsmccain/</link>
	<description>Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crushliberalism</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/07/29/laugher-of-the-day-msm-favorsmccain/#comment-8186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crushliberalism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=3635#comment-8186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB,

Like you, I am not sold on the Silky Pony lovechild story.  That&#039;s one reason I haven&#039;t posted anything about it in any kind of detail.

However, I do find it beyond amusing that the NYT ignores that story (which is rife with innuendo and devoid of a smoking gun) but ran the McCain-lobbyist story (which is rife with innuendo and devoid of a smoking gun).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB,</p>
<p>Like you, I am not sold on the Silky Pony lovechild story.  That&#8217;s one reason I haven&#8217;t posted anything about it in any kind of detail.</p>
<p>However, I do find it beyond amusing that the NYT ignores that story (which is rife with innuendo and devoid of a smoking gun) but ran the McCain-lobbyist story (which is rife with innuendo and devoid of a smoking gun).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBad</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2008/07/29/laugher-of-the-day-msm-favorsmccain/#comment-8184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=3635#comment-8184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the ultimate outrage is not the unwillingness to print the Edwards story – I’m still leery of it myself – but rather the unwillingness to apply the same set of standards when it comes to this type of story.  No doubt that, as they have before, the exact set of circumstances with a Republican would have produced a media firestorm that would have put the Foley coverage to shame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the ultimate outrage is not the unwillingness to print the Edwards story – I’m still leery of it myself – but rather the unwillingness to apply the same set of standards when it comes to this type of story.  No doubt that, as they have before, the exact set of circumstances with a Republican would have produced a media firestorm that would have put the Foley coverage to shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

