Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Liberal author: U.S. should pay reparations to…Al Qaeda!

Oh. My. Allah.  From the American Spectator (hat tip to Kanaka Girl):

… In wonderfully liberal style that is beyond parody, Rutten uses a book review to endorse the idea of paying money to Osama’s fighters who, in the eyes of liberals, have been denied their “right” of habeas corpus at Guantanamo. The denial of habeas to non-Americans captured on foreign battlefields is, of course, also a major campaign point for Senator Obama. Obama, restating his long-held position about captured al Qaeda fighters having the right of habeas corpus, was prompted by the recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. Bush. The liberals on the Court, with the mind-boggling addition of Reagan appointee Anthony Kennedy, held that contrary to Bush administration and congressional policy, not to mention all of American history, the prisoners of war or “detainees” picked up off the battlefields (in this case Afghanistan and Iraq) are in fact entitled to the same constitutional rights as American citizens.

Within weeks of this Obama-approved decision, his allies in liberalism have now started lobbying not simply for habeas corpus rights for al Qaeda but reparations as well. They believe American taxpayers should pay monetary damages to bin Laden terrorists, with Mr. Rutten of the Times approvingly citing the liberal editors of the Jesuit magazine America: The National Catholic Weekly. In their July 21st issue these presumed Obama supporters say this:

Finally, in the years ahead our country must still come to grips with our national acquiescence to the politics of fear, which has led to the detention and abuse of hundreds of individuals. Among the necessary steps will be restoration of freedom to innocent detainees, accompanied by public apology and some monetary restitution for the years they lost to incarceration. Furthermore, Congress needs to accept responsibility for its complicity with the executive in laws that denied suspects rightful appeal. A national truth commission should be instituted to establish political accountability for the decisions, policies and statutes that placed suspects outside the protection of the law.

In other words, if you have been captured on the field of battle fighting the U.S. military on behalf of the global jihad and, as a result, are now on an extended stay at Gitmo, liberals feel the appropriate policy of the United States government is to 1) apologize for capturing you and 2) pay you some cold American cash to ease your pain and humiliation. …

“Sorry we retaliated against you for slaughtering a few thousand of our countrymen and trying to kill our ‘infidel’ soldiers.  Didn’t mean to inconvenience you there.  How’s about some free falafel for life and a collective group hug?”

The science is clear, and the debate is over: liberalism is truly a mental disorder.


July 30, 2008 - Posted by crushliberalism | moonbats, religion of peace

10 Comments »

  1. To quote Yakov Smirnoff, “What a country!” You kill 3000 on 9/11/2001, kill thousands at other times. We capture you, put you up in a tropical paradise, and now we pay you for your vacation from the killing.

    Comment by Steve | July 30, 2008

  2. The only amount of money we should spend on the “guests” at Guantanamo is the cost of a bullet and the cheap pine box. If their relatives want the body back THEY pay to get it home.

    Comment by WMD_Maker | July 30, 2008

  3. I agree WMD!

    Liberals are becoming a bigger enemy to this country than Al Qaeda.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | July 30, 2008

  4. I agree WMD!

    Liberals are becoming a bigger enemy to this country than Al Qaeda.

    I agree with both of you but there is still a way around all this stupidity that the liberals won’t like. NO FREAKIN’ PRISONERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Comment by tnjack | July 30, 2008

  5. What the hell are you talking about, Kanaka Girl? Liberals are not becoming a bigger threat than Al Qaeda– THEY ALWAYS HAVE BEEN!

    Angry D.

    Comment by Angry D. | July 30, 2008

  6. I agree with the NO FREAKIN’ PRISONERS!! comment. Unfortunately, our US military, as good as they are have a very bad habit of “eating their young”. There are several cases ongoing where our military justice system has a number of service personnel facing charges of murder or manslaughter for doing their job.

    Civil authorities are no better especially in the Peoples Republic of Kalifornia. One case in point is ongoing in Riverside, California right now and it is by the civilian authorities, a former squad member applying for a job with the Secret Service failed a question on a lie detector. Now, the squad leader in in jail because he refused to testify before a Grand Jury implicating squad members in the killing of an Iraqi.

    Comment by Lee | July 30, 2008

  7. We just used the “no freakin prisoners” play on AQ’s mad scientist Midhat Mursi, who was denied his rights of torture and secret prison. And nobody on the left complained.

    Comment by A.C. McCloud | July 30, 2008

  8. Fine, if we must pay reparations, then give each prisoner what he would’ve earned in five years living “free” in Afghanistan: 13 cents, a goat, and two chickens. Now, if they can just figure out how to swim back across the Atlantic with a goat under one arm and two chickens under the other…

    Comment by PabloD | July 30, 2008

  9. Pablo, are you insane? Chickens are expensive!

    Angry D.

    Comment by Angry D. | July 31, 2008

  10. Liberals are not becoming a bigger threat than Al Qaeda– THEY ALWAYS HAVE BEEN!

    Angry D — you’re right… I stand corrected.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | July 31, 2008


Leave a comment