Obama’s Exxon hypocrisy
The Obamaliar is running a new ad referring to McCain as “Exxon John”. Cheeky, no? There’s just one small, itty-bitty, teensie-weensie little problem with that line of attack: it’s not McCain that’s received more money from Exxon!
But hey, why let a little thing like facts get in the way of a good attack ad? Obooby has gotten this far in life without the need for facts, decency, honesty, or consistency, so why start now?
Couresy of Jeff Dobbs.
Advertisement
3 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- February 2012 (10)
- January 2012 (19)
- December 2011 (25)
- November 2011 (41)
- October 2011 (38)
- September 2011 (32)
- August 2011 (39)
- July 2011 (28)
- June 2011 (43)
- May 2011 (34)
- April 2011 (30)
- March 2011 (40)
-
Categories
- "art"
- "hate crimes"
- 9/11 Commission
- abortion
- ACLU
- ACORN
- affirmative action
- Afghanistan
- Ahmanutjob
- Air America
- al franken
- Al Sharpton
- ambulance chasers
- Andrew Sullivan
- animal rights wackos
- Ann Coulter
- Anthony Weiner
- anti-Semitism
- Arizona shooting
- Arlen Specter
- atheists
- Australia
- autism
- Barney Frank
- Beeb
- Biden
- big government
- bigotry
- Bill Clinton
- Bill Richardson
- bizarre
- Blagojevich
- Blog Talk Radio
- Bloomberg
- Bobby Jindal
- CAIR
- California
- Canada
- Canucks
- capital punishment
- capitalism
- Caroline Kennedy
- Carter
- Castro
- Catholics
- Charlie Crist
- Cheney
- Chicago
- China
- Chris Christie
- Christianity
- Chuck Schumer
- CLOWNS
- CNN
- conservatism
- Constitution
- corruption
- Cuba
- D.C.
- Dan Rather
- Darfur
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
- defeatism
- Detroit
- dhimmitude
- Dodd
- drugs
- Duke lacrosse
- economic ignorance
- Egypt
- eminent domain
- energy
- environuts
- Episcopalians
- Eric Cantor
- Euros
- Fair Tax
- Fairness Doctrine
- Farrakhan
- fauxtography
- feminism
- Florida
- Fort Dix Six
- Fox News
- France
- freaky deaky
- Fred Thompson
- Ft. Hood
- gay
- Germany
- global warming
- Godwin's Law
- Gore
- Grayson
- gun rights
- Halliburton
- headlines
- health care
- Herman Cain
- Hillary
- Holder
- Hollyweirdos
- homeless
- Howard Dean
- Huckabee
- Hugo Chavez
- humor
- hurricanes
- hypocrisy
- illegal immigration
- Imus
- intelligence
- Iran
- Iraq
- irony
- Israel
- Janet Napolitano
- Japan
- Jena
- Jesse Jackson
- John Boehner
- John Edwards
- Jose Padilla
- judiciary
- karma
- Kennedrunk
- Kerry
- Larry Craig
- Leahy
- Libby
- libertarian
- Libya
- Lieberman
- Lindsey Graham
- Lott
- Louisiana
- Marco Rubio
- Mark Sanford
- Massachusetts
- McCain
- McClellan
- media bias
- Mel Martinez
- Memphis
- Mexico
- Michael Moore
- Michael Steele
- Michelle Bachmann
- military
- minimum wage
- Minnesota
- moonbats
- MSNBC
- Mugabe
- Murtha
- NAACP
- New Jersey
- New York
- news bytes
- Newt Gingrich
- Night and Day
- Ninth Circus Court
- non-political
- North Korea
- Obama
- Occupy Wall Street
- oil
- Olbermann
- Operation Fast and Furious
- Osama bin Laden
- Palin
- Pelosi
- photoshop
- Plamegate
- political correctness
- polls
- Pope
- pork
- privacy
- property rights
- public education
- public service announcement
- Putin
- quote of the day
- Reid
- religion of peace
- Rick Perry
- Rick Santorum
- Rick Scott
- Robert Byrd
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Ron Paul
- Rudy
- Rush
- Russia
- San Francisco
- satire
- Seattle
- separated at birth
- shameful
- Shehag
- smoking
- Social Security
- socialism
- Solyndra
- Soros
- Spitzer
- Supreme Court
- swine flu
- taxes
- Tea Party
- Texas
- The Memphis Posse
- Tim Geithner
- Tim Pawlenty
- tolerance
- TOTUS
- treason
- Uncategorized
- unions
- United Nations
- vandalism
- Vermont
- vote fraud
- Wal-Mart
- Wall Street
- Ward Churchill
- Warren Buffett
- Webb
- wingnuts
- Wisconsin
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

Facts? Lets talk facts then. The article you link to does not say that Exxon gives more money to the Obama Campaign, it says that Exxon employees do. So the workers of the company have donated more. Not the company itself. Those are private citizens, they do not donate as a corporate entity.
Here’s a quote from the article you linked to, “Comparing Obama’s and McCain’s financial ties to the oil industry, there’s no question that McCain has benefited more from the industry’s contributions, just as his Republican Party has for years and years.”
Comment by Robert | August 12, 2008
Do you even read, Robert?
“But Obama’s edge with the oil producers Americans know best — and might be cursing most these days — makes it harder for him to continue to tar McCain as the industry’s darling.”
There is no differentiation between Exxon employees and the Exxon corporate entity when it comes to giving. If Exxon Corp. decides to donate to a candidate, it takes a board of individuals to sign off on it. Who are those individuals? Employees, i.e. workers of the company, i.e. private citizens. More of these employees of Exxon, BP, and Chevron have donated to Oilbama.
When you throw in the other oil companies (Koch Industries, Valero, Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum, ConocoPhillips, etc.), then McCain has more contributions. You would think a man as allegedly brilliant as the Obamessiah would have used one of those other bogeymen instead of biting the Exxon hand that feeds him.
Besides, if McCain was a shill for Big Oil, why did he vote against the 2005 Bush energy bill (which handed out big subsidies for Big Oil) that Obama supported? Obama sure seems to talk a good game about not taking oil company contributions, but (a) the above shows that he’s lying about that; and (b) this shows he’s lying about that. As noted in the prior link:
Sorry, but “Exxon John” just doesn’t stick. Care to try again?
Comment by crushliberalism | August 12, 2008
Any of the msm giants picking up on this story? Anyone? Anyone? Buehler?
>crickets chirping<
Nope, no liberal media bias apparent…
Comment by Submariner | August 12, 2008