Typical liberal. Is it Jon’s fault that you are doing something at your job that you should not? It’s called accountability, sir. Take responsibility for your actions.

Good point. I mean, after all, “racist” and “pathetic weener” aren’t personal attacks, are they?

don’t you have any shame?

See the aforementioned “racist” and “pathetic weener” comments you left. I should be asking you that question, you hypocritical jerk. Now p#ss off.

If you want to engage in a substantive argument of policy differences, fine by me. Heck, most of here would love to hear why you think it’s OK for The One to be engaging in Nazi-like stormtrooper “1984″-esque tactics. But your drivel gives the impression that you’re just an emotional b#tch incapable of informed dialogue.

BTW, if it makes you feel any better, I edited out your employer’s name above. Next time, pick your words and your fights more carefully.

It takes no functional brain cells to spew a “racist/sexist/homophobic/(insert baseless slur du jour here)” with no basis to your claim. For you barking, tinfoil moonbats, normal Americans who oppose your Obamessiah on his policies aren’t doing so based on genuine disagreement, but on “racism”. Your intellectual laziness does not impress me.

BTW, your bosses at [company name here] may not appreciate you using the company computers to engage in political activity like this. And with the sheer eloquence with which you speak, can the general public expect a similar display from your company’s [company's services here] professionals? Get back to work, loser.

You guys wanted a moonbat to play with? Have at him. Consider it an early Christmas present.

Willing to meet unconditionally with leaders of rogue nations with aspirations of world domination and destruction of United States? Check.

Willing to appear on local radio show in Chicago to rebut facts of his relationship with a domestic terrorist? Not a chance, pal.

Of Kurtz:

“right-wing hatchet man”
“fear-mongering”
“smear-merchant”
“slimy character assassin”
“divisive”
“destructive”

All for what? Discussing documented facts? Where were all of these colorful metaphors when Obama drudged up Jack Ryan’s divorce records in his 2004 Senate bid? Smear-merchant indeed.