Comments on: Pelosi: We don’t need to drill for fossil fuels; instead, we need natural gas http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/ Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"? Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:20:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: SPURWING PLOVER http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-15918 Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:26:24 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-15918 Someone should tell that old bat you cant run a car or jet on natural gas and you still have to drill for it

]]> By: TheBad http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9516 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:11:22 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9516 Babs Boxer – model of ethics.

]]> By: tnjack http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9510 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:48:45 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9510 Which democrat is in charge of Ethics committee? I’m sure they’ll look into any accounts of potential wrongdoings.

]]> By: Tyrone http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9475 Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:52:23 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9475 Pelosi conveniently forgets to mention the reason why she wants Natual gas over oil is due to her stock investment in T Boone PIckens Clean Energy company. For her to have an investment in an alternative energy company and her pushing for alternative energy policy screams CONFLICT OF INTEREST!!!

]]> By: TheBad http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9473 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:01:14 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9473 Dishonest? Unethical? From this, the most open and ethical Congress evah? Sounds like code for racism to me.

]]> By: Kanaka Girl http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9472 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:16:15 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9472 Her idiocy aside…… I believe it’s a huge conflict of interest for members of Congress to be allowed to personally invest in commodities that they have a direct hand in regulating. Seems rather dishonest and unethical.

]]> By: Braden http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9471 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:15:57 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9471 What’s even more scary? Her “followers” vote for her.

Man, I love our public education system.

*cough* just another reason why my kids are going to a private school.

]]> By: WMD_Maker http://crushliberalism.com/2008/09/17/pelosi-we-dont-need-to-drill-for-fossil-fuels-instead-we-need-natural-gas/#comment-9470 Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:30:59 +0000 http://crushliberalism.wordpress.com/?p=4264#comment-9470 She obvoiusly doent understand that for the most part the same place yopu drill for that “nasty oil” is the same place you drill for natural gas. Quite often FROM THE SAME WELL. First you get natural gas then you get oil because the natural gas SITS ON TOP OF OIL. And by the way Nancy natural gas produces CARBON when burned so it doesnt offset your carbon footprint (like that is anything but a shell game).

]]>