Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Obama’s activist Supreme Court nominee

President Oprompter has settled on his Supreme Court nominee to replace Bush the Elder’s mistake (David Souter).  So what do we know about Sonia Sotomayor?

Well, for starters, we know that she thinks it is the role of the appeals courts to make policy:

Um, all of the legal defense funds out there, um, they’re looking for people out there with court of appeals experience, because court of appeals is where policy is made. And I know, I know this is on tape and I should never say that because we don’t make law, I know. Um, um — [laughter] — I know. I’m not promoting it, I’m not advocating it, and, I’m … you know. [laughter]

We also know that she is a racist and a sexist:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” — Judge Sonia Sotomayor, in her Judge Mario G. Olmos Law and Cultural Diversity Lecture at the University of California (Berkeley) School of Law in 2001

So by virtue of her being a Latina, her legal reasoning and grounding in constitutional law is stronger than that of a black man, or a white woman, or anyone else?  Anyone care to guess what the reaction from the left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) would have been if a white dude had made an identical statement that lauded the advantages that while maledom would bring to the court?

We know that Uhhh-bama told us during the election that SCOTUS justices don’t need to know the Constitution, so long as they possess a trait more important than that: empathy.  Do you people now see why I refer to liberalism as a “feeling, not thinking” ideology?  Any man who thinks that a SCOTUS justice who “empathizes” better than she understands the Constitution that she’s been given lifetime tenure to interpret is clearly devoid of any thinking skills.  Therefore, it should come as no surprise that he picks a nominee who is equally dismissive of prerequisites of constitutional knowledge.

One other thing we know: the American Idol that the lost sheeple elected last year will see his nominee approved, regardless of what kind of ideologue she is.

Advertisement

May 26, 2009 - Posted by | Obama, Supreme Court

7 Comments »

  1. I hope that during the approval process someone asks her what she thinks (er feels) of the Roe v Wade ruling. I that will pretty much give everybody insight as to her future rulings as a new SC justice. And you’re right she will most certainly be approved by this Congress.

    Comment by tnjack | May 26, 2009

  2. Obama re-established his credentials as the ‘cool’ President by nominating the first female Hispanic to serve on the court. The nominee even passed Obama’s coolness test. (you can see that at: http://firstconservative.com/blog/top-ten/political-humor-ten-qualifications-for-supreme-court-nominees )

    Sotomayor’s tendencies towards judicial activism will be overshadowed by her compelling personal story. After all, empathy is more important than judicial restraint.

    Comment by MAS1916 | May 26, 2009

  3. It’s a sad day indeed for our judiciary.

    Too bad the Republicans don’t have the collective cajones to fight this.

    The press already has her confirmed…what with her “compelling life story” and all. Screw bonafide qualifications. It’s all about feeeeeeeling.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | May 26, 2009

  4. Of all the names and Bios that were on the short list, this was the one judge I feared the most. She is a Liberal Home Run! She runs more left than Ginsberg with less than half the brains. Her confirmation is not a lock if the Republicans oppose her. Remember the “Gang of 14″ thing. She may qualify as an “extreme circumstance” under the gangs view. All the Republicans have to do is turn one Dem and hold their own to defeat a cloture vote.

    Comment by Steve | May 26, 2009

  5. “if the Republicans oppose her”
    You’re right Steve but that’s a mighty big IF.
    All the republicans have to do is examine her record of 4 overturned rulings by the Supreme Court already.

    Comment by tnjack | May 27, 2009

  6. And yet us conservatives will sure be called racists for pointing out such things…….great blog, first time here

    Comment by Left Coast Rebel | May 27, 2009

  7. Welcome, LCR! :)

    Comment by crushliberalism | May 27, 2009


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers