Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Weekend round-up

The human gaffe-o-meter we’ve got for VP admits something we all knew: the “stimulus” isn’t working.  Gee, thanks, Joe.  Nothing quite like peeing away our kids’ futures over something that doesn’t work, huh?  How’s that Hopenchange workin’ for you now?

Ahmanutjob says he won the Iranian “election”.  We know it was rigged.  Pro-reform students say they’re screwed if Obama accepts the tainted election results that confirm Ahmanutjob’s victory.  Obama says “Hey, sucks for you, reformers!” by legitimizing vote fraud, like his mentor Jimmy “the Dhimmi” Carter would do.  Of course, considering his deep ties to ACORN, this should come as no surprise.

Oprompter fires an Inspector General who was investigating an Uhhh-bama ally, a move that should have generated tons of outrage due to its reeking of Chicago-style corruption and cronyism.  Firing an I.G. is rare, even more so than, oh, firing U.S. Attorneys who serve at the pleasure of the president.  Yet for some really weird reason, the left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) made a lot of noise over the latter scenario when a Republican administration did it.  But nope…no liberal media bias!

Here is an outstanding column on the left’s and the MSM’s (it’s a redundant Monday, what can I say?) efforts to link abortionist George Tiller’s murderer to us pro-lifers.  I just want to know: Why is it “out of bounds” or “beyond the pale” to play “guilt by association” with Obama and guys he actually DID personally know and associate with (Wright, Ayers, Dohrn, Farrakahn), but it’s totally acceptable to play “guilt by association” with von Brunn and millions of people he didn’t know or who didn’t know him?  Nope…no liberal media bias!

June 15, 2009 - Posted by crushliberalism | Biden, Iran, Obama, abortion, big government, corruption, economic ignorance, hypocrisy, vote fraud

3 Comments »

  1. Pro-reform students say they’re screwed if Obama accepts the tainted election results that confirm Ahmanutjob’s victory.

    Two questions: 1) WHY does Obama get the last word in another country’s election?
    2) Why would anyone be surprised that Obama would except victory via voter fraud? It worked for him!

    Why is it “out of bounds” or “beyond the pale” to play “guilt by association” with Obama and guys he actually DID personally know and associate with (Wright, Ayers, Dohrn, Farrakahn), but it’s totally acceptable to play “guilt by association” with von Brunn and millions of people he didn’t know or who didn’t know him?

    It’s funny how the press is trying to make Von Brunn out to be some right wing wacko, but ignore the fact that the guy is a REGISTERED DEMOCRAT.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | June 15, 2009

  2. You have a good point with the stimulus criticism, and you make a good point that not all pro-lifers agree with violence, which should go without saying. However, you seem to be okay with really sweeping generalizations and oversimplification of complicated issues and discussions. I understand it’s a week in review, and that you do link to the original content, but it’s probably better to not say much at all than to make a couple inflammatory sentences without proper discussion of the issues and alternative possibilities surrounding those issues. The world is not so black and white. Don’t forget that.

    Comment by Bryan | June 15, 2009

  3. It’s funny how Obama excepts the Iranian election but the country’s own Supreme Leader has called for an investigation into voter fraud.
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31365097/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/

    Comment by Steve | June 15, 2009


Leave a comment

« Previous | Next »