<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court overtuns Sotomayor&#8217;s bigoted ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushliberalism.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-overtuns-sotomayors-bigoted-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-overtuns-sotomayors-bigoted-ruling/</link>
	<description>Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rightwing Guy</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-overtuns-sotomayors-bigoted-ruling/#comment-11416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rightwing Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/?p=5205#comment-11416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be actually funny if it wasnt true.
I like the page, we agree on many things. I linked ya on my page.
RWG]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be actually funny if it wasnt true.<br />
I like the page, we agree on many things. I linked ya on my page.<br />
RWG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnjack</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2009/06/29/supreme-court-overtuns-sotomayors-bigoted-ruling/#comment-11411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tnjack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/?p=5205#comment-11411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this makes the fifth time one of her &quot;wise latina woman&#039;s&quot; rulings have been overturned. 
But will it make a difference? NO! You know I used to think the Supreme Court justices had to be the wisest of judges but how can I assume such when the rulings are always split down political lines? One would think the rulings should almost always be unanimous if politics were removed and Constitutional Law was enforced but that hasn&#039;t been the case for much too long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this makes the fifth time one of her &#8220;wise latina woman&#8217;s&#8221; rulings have been overturned.<br />
But will it make a difference? NO! You know I used to think the Supreme Court justices had to be the wisest of judges but how can I assume such when the rulings are always split down political lines? One would think the rulings should almost always be unanimous if politics were removed and Constitutional Law was enforced but that hasn&#8217;t been the case for much too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

