Crush Liberalism

Liberalism: Why think when you can “feel”?

Obama: Of course I still want socialized medicine

I guess this answers my question as to whether the initial retreat was a trial balloon or a white flag.  Answer: trial balloon.  Details:

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs again denied Tuesday the administration sent a signal of retreat from the government-financed insurance component of health care reform, popularly known as the public option.

“If it was a signal, it was a dog whistle that we started blowing about three months ago, and it just got picked up,” Gibbs said at his morning, off-camera briefing with reporters. “It’s crazy.  It’s not a signal. It was what we’ve been saying for months on this. The goal is choice and competition.”

Gibbs was asked how the president’s reference to the public option at a Saturday town hall in Colorado as “not the entirety” of reform but “just one sliver, one aspect of it,” comported with his July 18 radio/web address declaration that reform “must include”  a public option, Gibbs said:

“The goal is choice and competition, the preference is the public plan. Choice and competition are what we want to see as it relates to the private health insurance market.”

Asked what accounted for the flurry of statements from House and Senate liberal Democrats on Monday defending the public option, Gibbs blamed reporters.

“They (lawmakers) read your all’s stories that were an overreaction to what Secretary Sebelius said,” Gibbs said. Asked if it was possible lawmakers reached their own conclusions, Gibbs said: “It’s entirely possible.”

Gibbs said President Obama has made no calls to reassure anyone on the public option, not “to lawmakers or liberals.”

Sebelius then decided to chastise the press (or, if you prefer, bite the hand that feeds her) for actually playing her comments:

Moments later, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius also blamed reporters for the public option consternation.

“If you were watching the news over the weekend you probably have seen reports about the Obama administration and the public option,” Sebelius said during remarks in Washington to the U.S. Administration on Aging’s Annual SMP (formerly known as Senior Medicare Control).

“All I can tell you is that Sunday must have been a slow news day because here’s the bottom line: absolutely nothing has changed; we continue to support the public option that will help lower cost, give American consumers more choice and keep private insurance honest.”

Oprompter had to stick with the government takeover in order to assuage liberals like Anthony Weiner (an appropriate surname if there ever was one) who admit to wanting to eliminate private insurance.

Advertisement

August 18, 2009 - Posted by | health care, Obama, socialism

2 Comments »

  1. if you spent $30 MILLION a day every single day for 2000 years it would still not equal to obama’s $23.7 TRILLLION in financial bailouts

    … the main reasons why people get poorer are because of higher taxes and inflation.

    Comment by Dave | August 18, 2009

  2. Why can’t just those why pay taxes get health benefits…how b’out that Obama and the rest of the health care reform starters??? NO seriously, this I could be in favor of, but not just letting any old person that comes to America, even the illegal’s to get health care and our taxes go up the roof???? No, sure, I will cont. to fight this…

    Comment by henryyoung | August 19, 2009


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers