Crush Liberalism

5 Comments »

1. MJK wouldn’t have minded being a martyr for the cause of St. Teddy’s Senate career?

   These people (a term used loosely) must be San Fran Stupid! And I’m not sure the Kennedy’s weren’t stupid too. I mean Teddy loved and supported the Clintons, until Hillary ran against Uh-Obama. And Omama’s buddy Bill Ayers wrote a book and dedicated it to Sirhan Sirhan (for you dimocrats that was Robert Kennedy’s assassin!) And Osama is supposed to be the next “Kennedy Son”?

   Comment by tnjack | August 28, 2009

2. A new conspiracy theory could evolve from these facts. Suppose that Sirhan Sirhan was hired by Ayers at the request of Ted to kill Bobby. The motive being, that it would eliminate Ted’s competition for the Presidency. Hmm…Think maybe Oliver Stone would be interested?

   Comment by aldezo | August 28, 2009

3. I really wish you anti-feminist yo-yos would stop trying to speak for us liberal women* when you don’t even listen to what we have to say.

   For your information, I don’t approve of what Ted did to MJK, I don’t feel she was an acceptable sacrifice, and his Senate career never should have gotten started, much less should have lasted this long. By the way, I also think John Edwards is a shithead for what he did to his wife, and Bill Clinton was for what he did to his. And I might point out I never voted for Clinton (though I did for Edwards, because the man he replaced in North Carolina was in some ways a MUCH bigger bastard, even from today’s perspective), and I feel proud to be able to say that. Bill’s a schmuck, and he threw a lot of traditionally Democratic constituents under the bus for no good reason, quite aside from his personal fuckups.

   (Feel free to edit my cussing if it bothers you.)

   Not to mention, a now-defunct feminist magazine called On The Issues not only was chronicling the Taliban’s abuse of Afghan women years before 9/11 would make it fashionable for Republicans to “liberate” them (but not us, of course–all our inequalities are TOTALLY OUR OWN FAULTS because the ERA was ratified and leveled the playing field–oh wait…)… but OTI also ran an editorial after the Lewinsky scandal broke, raking Billy-boy across the coals for his behavior. Because it ISN’T feminist to approve of adultery, from EITHER gender.

   You know, but Hillary couldn’t win. Had she kicked him in the nuts like he deserved, she’d have wound up in prison for assaulting the POTUS; had she simply left, conservatives would have been all over her ass for “breaking down” yet another “American family.” But that’s bidness as usual in these here disUnited States. No matter what a woman does, someone will either issue a religious decree or pass a law against it. Either way it goes, it’s always wrong.

   But yeah. You want to know what we say, ask US. Don’t ask some twit who had to look up “gender equity” in the goddamn dictionary.

   Hey Johnny… how’s it going. Been a while.

   ——————-
   *Inasmuch as I can be defined as “liberal.” I guess in some ways I could be, but in other ways I do NOT march in lockstep with the Kos-sacks. Although sometimes I think about starting a diary there just to mess with their heads…

   Comment by Dana | September 2, 2009

4. Dana, I won’t edit the profanity. Whether it bothers me or not is immaterial to your point.

   Anyway, I hope life is treating you well.

   Comment by crushliberalism | September 2, 2009

5. Has anyone read the book “Senatorial Privilege?” It is a factual expose of the Chappaquiddick death of Mary Jo Kopecne. Ted Kennedy was supposed to be driving Mary Jo home from the party that night. You can draw your own conclusions from my next few of sentences. First of all when Mary Jo Kopecne left the party with Ted Kenney to “supposedly” “drive her home,” the rest of the girls working for Bobby Kennedy’s campaign did not leave to go home, they stayed because the party wasn’t over. When Mary Jo left with Ted she was wearing slacks and a blouse and seemingly fully dressed. But when her body was retrieved from the bay, even though she was still wearing her slacks . . she was not wearing any “panties.” Also the pocketbook that was found in the back of the car, under water with her body, did not belong to Mary jo Kopecne. The purse that was found with Mary Jo’s body actually belonged to one of the girls that was still back at the party. Mary Jo left her purse back at the party which suggests that she and Kennedy intended to return after they completed their “business.” All of those girls at the party were removed off the island the next day along with Mary Jo’s pocketbook. And her panties? I believe Mary Jo left the party sans her panties because she and Teddy were heading for the “lovers lane, the old bridge over the the channel so they could feel the Motion-of-the-Ocean-together. Remember the bridge that Kennedy drove the car off-of, was a known “Lovers lane” to the locals. The hotel where all of the girls (and Mary Jo) were staying was in the opposite direction. I personally feel Mary Jo and Teddy were having an ongoing affair and that Mary Jo was pregnant. I think she confronted Teddy with the facts and made some demands on him . . a fight ensued . . and he killed her. Why else did Kennedy use his family’s power in Massachewsettes to stop the forensics that would have resulted from an autopsy? Why did Mary Jo’s parents fight so hard to keep an autopsy from being performed. Because if she was pregnant that would have also come to light. Only Kennedy had enough power to stop an autopsy in a death like that where an autopsy would have been mandatory for everyone else under those circumstances. Mary Jo’s parents were conserviative Catholic’s from the old school; and news of her pregnancy would have disgraced them. Lastly, Kennedy paid the Kopeckne’s $80,000.00 at the time. Back in the 1960′s that was a HUGE amount of money! Read the book . . it is all in there. What I have stated is just the tip of the iceberg. Benita

   Comment by Benita | September 6, 2009

« Previous | Next »

Site info

Crush Liberalism
Theme: Andreas04 by Andreas Viklund. Blog at WordPress.com.