<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats try to &#8220;polish a turd&#8221; by rebranding &#8220;public option&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crushliberalism.com/2009/10/27/democrats-try-to-polish-a-turd-by-rebranding-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2009/10/27/democrats-try-to-polish-a-turd-by-rebranding-public-option/</link>
	<description>Liberalism: Why think when you can "feel"?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanaka Girl</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2009/10/27/democrats-try-to-polish-a-turd-by-rebranding-public-option/#comment-12021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kanaka Girl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/?p=5671#comment-12021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;They really thought this would work?&lt;/i&gt;

Clearly they are operating under the assumption that the rest of us are as stupid as the people who keep re-electing them.  I think 2010 is going to be a big eye opener for Pelosi and the gang.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>They really thought this would work?</i></p>
<p>Clearly they are operating under the assumption that the rest of us are as stupid as the people who keep re-electing them.  I think 2010 is going to be a big eye opener for Pelosi and the gang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBad</title>
		<link>http://crushliberalism.com/2009/10/27/democrats-try-to-polish-a-turd-by-rebranding-public-option/#comment-12012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheBad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crushliberalism.com/?p=5671#comment-12012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite typical and not at all surprising.  A liberal notices that the public dislikes their idea on policy, so rather than (a) effectively defend the policy or (b) adjust the policy to reflect the public interest, they &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;rebrand&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; the policy.  Same crappy policy, new and improved name.  They really thought this would work?  Check, please.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite typical and not at all surprising.  A liberal notices that the public dislikes their idea on policy, so rather than (a) effectively defend the policy or (b) adjust the policy to reflect the public interest, they <b><i>rebrand</i></b> the policy.  Same crappy policy, new and improved name.  They really thought this would work?  Check, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

