Crush Liberalism

11 Comments »

1. Is CNN still on the TV? Seriously. Who’s still watching it? Okay, probably a couple of folks in Vermont at the most. Their picking of this loser for accolades last year was incredibly stupid. But, hey, it is CNN.
   Army needs to take a closer look at known muzzies in the service. PC is out the window at this point, or should be.
   Stupid liberals, put us all in danger from the nutjobs within.

   Comment by J.Guidry | July 28, 2011

2. Army needs to take a closer look at known muzzies in the service. PC is out the window at this point, or should be.
   Stupid liberals, put us all in danger from the nutjobs within.

   J – we can’t even get DHS to acknowledge that muzzies are committing 99.9% of the acts of terrorism around the world . Given the track record of colossal stupidity exhibited by our liberal overlords, they’ll be more likely to profile white Christians in the military, rather than Muslims. According to Big Sis, the Tea Party are the true terrorists.

   Comment by Kanaka Girl | July 28, 2011

3. [...] Muslim soldier, hailed by CNN, who went AWOL for refusing deployment to Afghanistan arrested in Fort… (crushliberalism.com) [...]

   Pingback by Why Are Muslim Soldiers Allowed in the US Military? | Alternative News Report | July 28, 2011

4. This jackass is living proof the gene pool needs more chlorine.

   Comment by Whittlin' Man | July 28, 2011

5. Right KG. And as I’ve said before…..Liberals CANNOT be expected to keep America safe!

   Comment by tnjack | July 29, 2011

6. KG & tnjack, It’s not just the USA where Libs have there head in the sand. Look at Europe. The Libs there are completely blind to the threat.

   Comment by Steve | July 29, 2011

7. I am curious to know how you can be for “small government” and also be a “social conservative”. Do you believe that the government should enforce how citizens conduct their private lives? How can the government do that AND be “small” at the same time? If you want to advocate small government but take a Libertarian position on social issues, I understand you. But otherwise I am scratching my head…

   Comment by polly | July 30, 2011

8. Polly,

   Thank you for the question, though I’m not sure how it relates to this post about the Muslim soldier.

   I don’t want to be presumptuous about your question, so please elaborate on how you think being a social conservative means advocating government interfering with private lives. What part of private lives do you think social conservatives advocate government interference? I think I know what you mean, but again, I don’t want to put words in your mouth.

   Comment by crushliberalism | July 30, 2011

9. A woman’s right to control her own body, for one thing. The right of same sex partners to form the same kind of contract with each other that a man and woman do when they marry, for another.

   Comment by polly | July 31, 2011

10. Polly,

    Yeah, my hunch was correct. So here we go:

    A woman’s right to control her own body, for one thing.

    If you mean the “right” for her to murder her unborn, then no, I do not support that “right”. Liberals are depraved enough to focus on the “choose” part, totally ignoring the murder part. As if the baby would “choose” to be murdered.

    The right of same sex partners to form the same kind of contract with each other that a man and woman do when they marry, for another

    A gay man has the same right to marry a female that a straight man has. That he chooses not to is immaterial. Personally, I don’t think government should be in the marriage business in the first place, but since they are (and likely will be for the rest of the time left on this planet), then I have no problem with God’s “one man, one woman” commandment being in effect.

    Comment by crushliberalism | August 1, 2011

11. I am curious to know how you can be for “small government” and also be a “social conservative”.

    We are a nation of laws. Abiding by those laws does not make one an advocate of big government.

    I always marvel when liberals use the “woman’s right to control her body” excuse to justify murder. No one cares what a woman does with her own body, but using it to take the life of another is murder. By that logic, all murderers should be acquitted becuse they were “in control of their body” as they pulled the trigger.

    Comment by Kanaka Girl | August 1, 2011

« Previous | Next »

Site info

Crush Liberalism
Theme: Andreas04 by Andreas Viklund. Blog at WordPress.com.