Crush Liberalism

June 15, 2009

Weekend round-up

Filed under: Biden, Iran, Obama, abortion, big government, corruption, economic ignorance, hypocrisy, vote fraud — crushliberalism @ 7:40 am

The human gaffe-o-meter we’ve got for VP admits something we all knew: the “stimulus” isn’t working.  Gee, thanks, Joe.  Nothing quite like peeing away our kids’ futures over something that doesn’t work, huh?  How’s that Hopenchange workin’ for you now?

Ahmanutjob says he won the Iranian “election”.  We know it was rigged.  Pro-reform students say they’re screwed if Obama accepts the tainted election results that confirm Ahmanutjob’s victory.  Obama says “Hey, sucks for you, reformers!” by legitimizing vote fraud, like his mentor Jimmy “the Dhimmi” Carter would do.  Of course, considering his deep ties to ACORN, this should come as no surprise.

Oprompter fires an Inspector General who was investigating an Uhhh-bama ally, a move that should have generated tons of outrage due to its reeking of Chicago-style corruption and cronyism.  Firing an I.G. is rare, even more so than, oh, firing U.S. Attorneys who serve at the pleasure of the president.  Yet for some really weird reason, the left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) made a lot of noise over the latter scenario when a Republican administration did it.  But nope…no liberal media bias!

Here is an outstanding column on the left’s and the MSM’s (it’s a redundant Monday, what can I say?) efforts to link abortionist George Tiller’s murderer to us pro-lifers.  I just want to know: Why is it “out of bounds” or “beyond the pale” to play “guilt by association” with Obama and guys he actually DID personally know and associate with (Wright, Ayers, Dohrn, Farrakahn), but it’s totally acceptable to play “guilt by association” with von Brunn and millions of people he didn’t know or who didn’t know him?  Nope…no liberal media bias!

May 21, 2009

Obama’s bad week

Filed under: Biden, Obama, big government, economic ignorance, media bias, religion of peace, taxes, unions — crushliberalism @ 1:16 pm

The week’s a little more than halfway over, and let’s see what our illustrious Genius In Chief has had to endure, shall we?  Te recap:

He doesn’t know his own Secretary of Defense’s name.  We know, we know…you inherited him from Bush.

He’s fighting with his own party to close Gitmo.  For some really weird reason, a lot of people don’t think it’s a good idea to close a terrorist Alcatraz and bring bloodthirsty jihadist camelhumpers to America where they might try to blow up NY synagogues.  Go figure.  Especially when 1 in 7 freed Gitmo detainees return to terrorism (the administration was trying to keep that factoid on the “down-low”, so as not to undermine his stupid, heavy-on-emotion-but-light-on-fact case for closing Gitmo unduly alarming anyone).

Jobless claims are on the rise at a record pace.  Oil prices are up.  The CBO says unemployment will keep going up through next year.  We’ve quadrupled our deficit from last year.  The dollar is teetering on collapse.  Yet the MSM tries to sell us on how the economy has turned around?

The Gilded One has been caught in a lie about the “transparency” we were going to see from the Porkulus bill he signed into law.

Thanks to Uhhh-bama’s unholy alliance with unions, union-based companies are going to find it tough to get loans for their businesses. 

Oprompter’s vice-president isn’t exactly the shiniest light on the Christmas tree, and it’s proving to be very “distracting”, according to a new book.  When he plagiarizes Hillary’s Tuzla moment as something that really happened to him (forgetting that we’ve heard the story before, and from/to someone else), it’s easy to see how Quayle…er, Biden…can be such a “distraction”, no?

Remember Team Obama’s promise that “no one earning under $250k will see their taxes go up a dime”?  Well, the Senate is bringing up a federal beer tax to fund Omarxist’s socialized medicine plan.  I had no idea that the only people who drank beer were folks who earned a quarter million dollars and higher.

On the positive front for him:

He still has the NYT in his pocket, so much so that they’ve opened their very own NYT Obama merchandise store.  But no, no liberal media bias or anything!

March 29, 2009

The week in review

Filed under: Biden, Obama, big government, economic ignorance, hypocrisy, socialism, taxes — crushliberalism @ 9:50 pm

Let’s recap the prior week’s news nuggets, shall we?

That brilliant foreign policy expert veep we have, the gaffe-tastic Joe Biden, thanked Spanish prime minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero for his help in Iraq.  Someone forgot to let the Vice-Plagiarist know that Zap was elected right after the Madrid train bombing by al Qaeda in 2004, promising immediate withdrawal in response to the bombing.  As soon as Zap took office, he made good on his cowardly promise.  Brilliant, Joe.  Boy, it sure is a good thing we finally have people with brains running the show!

President Oprompter feels that “I think it’s important to engage your critics … because not only will you occasionally change their mind but, more importantly, sometimes they will change your mind”.  Of course…which would explain why the five people the prez called upon during this town hall meeting just so happened to be, miracle of all miracles, avid Obama supporters!

In 2006, Rahm Emmanuel made a compelling case for opposing corporate welfare and for taking pride in welfare reform that took place during the Clinton years.  Now the same man thinks that corporate bailouts (same diff as corporate welfare, aren’t they?) are an awesome idea, as is his boss’ Porkulus bill that dismantles welfare reform.  It’s like the man says one thing and does another or something!  I know, I know…paranoid of me to conclude that, huh?

Uhhh-bama hits the late night talk show circuit, 60 Minutes, and several other televised appearances in order to sell his socialist crap sandwich to America.  As a result of the smooth brutha’s sermons, support for said crap sandwich has…dropped an additional 5%.  Keep talking, sir!  You can defeat this thing yet.

Add The Economist to the list of right-of-center pundits/publications who should have consulted with Coach Dennis Green before endorsing The One, because they’re now finding out that Obama is who we thought he was!  They now have buyer’s remorse.  Q and O asks them “What leadership position of any importance has the man ever held that would indicate he had what it took to lead as President?  And why didn’t you explore that question, its answer and ramifications before you jumped on the Hope and Change bandwagon?”

Candidate O promised us that whole “95% of working families” tax cut thingy.  We adults warned the Kool-Aid drinkers and economic illiterates that (ignoring the reality that 95% of Americans don’t pay taxes) he, like other Democrats, don’t cut taxes…they raise them.  Clinton did the same thing in 1992, running on a “middle class tax cut” then promptly reneging on the deal (some would say “lied”, but why quibble over semantics?) and raising our taxes.  The Obamessiah is now doing the same thing.  Awesome video montage here.  The last two Democrat presidents have been pathological liars, saying whatever the sheeple want to hear.  It’s like they’re so hopelessly dishonest they can’t help themselves.

Like I said before: elections have consequences.

December 22, 2008

Quotes of the day, Cheney edition

Filed under: Biden, Cheney, quote of the day — crushliberalism @ 7:32 am

Excerpts from an interview with FNC’s Chris Wallace over the weekend.  The first one:

WALLACE: Did you really tell Senator Leahy, bleep yourself?

CHENEY: I did.

WALLACE: Any qualms or second thoughts or embarrassment?

CHENEY: No, I thought he merited it at the time. And we’ve since, I think, patched over that wound and we’re civil to one another now.

While I do not condone vulgarity, I do not disagree that Leaky Leahy needed to be brought down a notch.  Whether or not an invitation to self-fornicate was the best approach, though…

Anywho, here’s the next one:

WALLACE: During the vice presidential debate in October, Joe Biden was asked about your interpretation of the powers of your office as vice president, and here’s what he said.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BIDEN: Vice President Cheney’s been the most dangerous vice president we’ve had probably in American history.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

WALLACE: Transition officials say that Biden plans to shrink his office, that he is not going to meet with Senate Democrats the way you did every week with Senate Republicans, that he is not going to have his own, quote, “shadow government” in the White House.

Biden has said that he believes you have dangerously expansive views of executive power.

CHENEY: Well, I just fundamentally disagree with him. He also said that the — all the powers and responsibilities of the executive branch are laid out in Article 1 of the Constitution. Well, they’re not. Article 1 of the Constitution is the one on the legislative branch.

Joe’s been chairman of the Judiciary Committee, a member of the Judiciary Committee in the Senate, for 36 years, teaches constitutional law back in Delaware, and can’t keep straight which article of the Constitution provides for the legislature and which provides for the executive.

So I think — I write that off as campaign rhetoric. I don’t take it seriously. And if he wants to diminish the office of vice president, that’s obviously his call.

I think that President-elect Obama will decide what he wants in a vice president. And apparently, from the way they’re talking about it, he does not expect him to have as consequential a role as I’ve had during my time.

Ouch!

I’m gonna miss Cheney.  The man has a unique talent of making leftist heads spontaneously explode!

December 17, 2008

More on Obama/Biden’s hiring of a Time journalist

Filed under: Biden, Obama, media bias — crushliberalism @ 4:04 pm

I touched on this yesterday, but Jim Geraghty makes an excellent observation:

The news that Jay Carney, editor at Time magazine, is leaving the publication to become Vice President-elect Joe Biden’s director of communications doesn’t leave me screaming bloody murder in outrage. But I have the same questions as when Linda Douglass joined Team Obama.

Job offers don’t come together overnight, and for obvious reasons, the hiring process and job interviews are usually confidential. But this means that now we have two examples where members of the press were “covering” the Obama campaign while at the same time angling for a job with them. Not exactly an ideal circumstance for criticism, fairness or objectivity. (To her credit, Douglass actually had a respectable interview of Obama strategist David Plouffe in the weeks before she was hired. But other comments from around the same time looked like blatant buttering-up of a prospective employer.)

Did these reporters’/editors’ superiors know they were interviewing for staff jobs? Don’t they have an obligation to disclose that to their editors? And shouldn’t readers know if a reporter has that potential conflict of interest?*

And as I wrote before, we don’t know if this is the only member of the media who interviewed for a position with Obama or Biden, and whether anyone else is interviewing with his campaign, or other campaigns. Who else in the press has been hoping to be hired by the Obama administration?

Nope…no liberal media bias!

December 16, 2008

Time mag’s Carney becomes Biden mouthpiece

Filed under: Biden, media bias — crushliberalism @ 12:13 pm

In other words, Carney’s new job of running interference for the Democrats won’t be that much different from his old job of running interference for the Democrats.  From Politico:

Jay Carney is leaving Time magazine after 20 years to be Vice President-elect Joe Biden’s communications director in the White House, astonished magazine and gleeful transition sources said.

Carney’s title will be assistant to the vice president and director of communications. TIME.com’s “The Page” first reported his new job.

Carney, the magazine’s Washington bureau chief, is one of Washington’s best-known talking heads, with regular appearances on ABC’s “This Week,” “The McLaughlin Group” and MSNBC’s “Hardball.”
…
Carney and his wife, Claire Shipman, the senior Washington correspondent for ABC’s “Good Morning America,” have two children — a son, Hugo, and daughter, Della.

This is the second member of the media elite who has signed on with Obama’s administration. ABC News correspondent Linda Douglass joined the campaign as traveling spokeswoman, and now is working for Obama’s Presidential Inaugural Committee. …

I’m sure, though, that he was 100% objective and neutral in his journalistic role over the last 20+ years.  For those of you on the left, the prior sentence was sarcasm.

Hey, I don’t blame the guy for getting a new job.  With fishwraps like Time going down the crapper on Carney’s watch, it makes sense to get while the getting is good.

October 20, 2008

Biden: Undecided voters are racist

Filed under: Biden, San Franistan, bigotry, shameful — crushliberalism @ 8:31 am

When The One isn’t busy lamenting “clingy, bitter, racist, xenophobic” voters while campaigning in San Fransicko, his running mate likes to do the same thing in that modern day Sodom and Gomorrah.  From Greasy Joe:

Undecided people are having a difficult time just culturally making the change, making the move for the first African American president in the history of the United States of America,” the Democratic vice-presidential nominee said at a San Francisco fundraiser Saturday evening.

October 16, 2008

Biden, Obama’s minions out to destroy “Joe the Plumber”

Filed under: Biden, Obama, moonbats, shameful, socialism — crushliberalism @ 2:05 pm

These vermin will have to answer to God Almighty one day for their despicable actions.  From NRO:

Thank God we live in a free country, where you can speak your mind on public issues, without fear that those who disagree will respond by exposing anything you’ve ever done that you regret or that could embarrass your family.

Oh, wait, never mind. We have to know, according to some, about Joe the Plumber’s tax lien, and how he doesn’t have a license – which, if the smear artists bothered to check the law, he only needs for commercial work, not residential work.

This is the way our opponents operate now. Destroy anyone who stands in your way. Humiliate them. Make sure that anyone else who ever wants to skeptically question Barack Obama knows that every last bit of their dirty laundry will be aired for all the world to see. Bristol Palin, Trig Palin, — hey, it’s all fair game. They’ve got to make an example of them. Show them that this sort of dangerous speech won’t be allowed in the New America.

Remember the man in the plaid shirt, standing at the town meeting in one of Norman Rockwell’s “Four Freedoms” paintings? He wouldn’t recognize this country anymore.

Greasy Joe gets in on the action:

Just a couple of days ago Sen. Barack Obama told Joe Wurzelbacher that he was going to spread Joe’s wealth around. This morning the Obama-Biden campaign appears to be targeting Mr. Wurzelbacher for criticism, even discounting the veracity of his situation.

Appearing on NBC this morning Sen. Joe Biden stated dismissively “I don’t have any ‘Joe the Plumbers’ in my neighborhood that make $250,000 a year.” This may well be true. But “Joe the Plumber” isn’t some fictional character, as Sen. Biden seems to suggest here. And Sen. Biden seems to be ignoring an important point: Mr. Wurzelbacher isn’t a plumber; he’s a small business owner in the plumbing trade. And if his gross revenue as a sole proprietorship hits $250,000 per year, he’s going to get soaked by the Obama-Biden tax scheme. This is a fundamental problem with the Obama tax plan, though it’s certainly not the only problem with it. Many millions of people in that super-rich tax bracket that Sen. Obama talks about aren’t oil executives or hedge fund managers; they are small businessmen and women who have things like overhead and employees and seasonal downturns they need to contend with. Sen. Obama’s tax plan would penalize hardworking Americans like Joe Wurzelbacher. And that’s just wrong.

Pray for God’s brand of justice, friends.

October 4, 2008

Biden demands charity of others, not himself

Filed under: Biden, Palin, hypocrisy, shameful — crushliberalism @ 9:37 pm

I’ve demonstrated numerous times how liberals sure talk a good game when it comes to charity to our fellow man…but their actions belie their rhetoric.  If liberals were even half as generous with their giving as they demand the rest of us to be, then the country (and the world) would be a better place.

Observe, from Ed Morrissey:

Yesterday, the Palins released their income tax returns for the last two years, as expected for the general election. While the returns showed the Palins to be squarely in the middle class, with income between $127,000 and $166,000 combined, they also revealed a charity gap between the two VP candidates:

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin made considerably less money than rival Sen. Joe Biden, but the Palin family gave more to charity in the last two years than Biden has in the last eight combined, according to Palin’s tax records released Friday afternoon. …

In 2006, the Palins paid $11,944 in taxes on $127,869 in income. In 2007, they paid $24,738 on $166,080.

But in 2006, they donated $4,880 to charity, and in 2007, they donated $3,325.

By contrast, Biden (D-Del.), Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s running mate, has donated a total of $3,690 since 1998 despite his higher Senate salary, according to an analysis posted by National Review.

Recall what Barack Obama said in his appearance at the Saddleback Forum in August:

“Americans’ greatest moral failure in my lifetime,” he said, “has been that we still don’t abide by that basic precept in Matthew that whatever you do for the least of my brothers, you do for me.”

And what Biden claimed as the moral imperative from soaking people with higher taxes:

“Catholic social doctrine as I was taught it is, you take care of people who need the help the most.”

Once again, we see that liberals talk about charity, and conservatives take action. The Palins have been quite generous with their cash, while Biden has given far less on an annual basis with a much larger income stream. Since the two Democrats keep claiming the charitable impulse for spending other people’s money, it’s revealing to once again compare Biden’s own personal giving to his political rhetoric, and to his opponent in November.

Senator Biden, being the allegedly devout Catholic that he is, should undoubtedly be familiar with 1st John 3: 17-18:  “If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him?  Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth.”

God bless the Palins for being more generous than Sen. Biden, despite having less wealth.

October 3, 2008

Democrats “the party of death”

Filed under: Biden, Christianity, Pelosi, abortion — crushliberalism @ 7:26 am

Matthew 7:16 says that “You will know them by their fruit. Grapes aren’t gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles, are they?”.  Obviously, the Democrats are bearing rancid, spolied fruit, and by this fruit, we know them very well.  From the Faith World blog at al-Reuters:

[Archbishop Raymond] Burke, who was named prefect of the Vatican’s Supreme Court of the Apostolic Signature in June, told the Italian Catholic newspaper Avvenire that the U.S. Democratic Party risked “transforming itself definitively into a party of death for its decisions on bioethical issues.” He then attacked two of the party’s most high profile Catholics — vice presidential candidate Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — for misrepresenting Church teaching on abortion.

He said Biden and Pelosi, “while presenting themselves as good Catholics, have presented Church doctrine on abortion in a false and tendentious way.”

Pelosi drew U.S. bishops’ scorn for saying in a television interview last month that the Church itself had long debated when human life begins. Biden is a practicing Catholic who also supports abortion rights and analysts have said he could help woo wavering Catholics into Obama’s fold. Both argue that they cannot impose their religious views on others.

Burke said pro-life Democrats were “rare” and that it saddened him that the party that helped “our immigrant parents and grandparents” prosper in America had changed so much over the years.

Burke made headlines as archbishop of St. Louis for his public attacks on public figures who strayed from Catholic teaching. He suggested during the 2004 presidential campaign that Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry, a Catholic, should be denied communion because of his views on abortion. Several bishops said at the time they would not give him communion and the media staked out churches where he attended Mass to see if he received it. 

It’s so simple that even a Geico caveman can see it: you cannot claim to be a Christian in general, and a Catholic in particular, if you distort and ignore Scripture’s position on abortion.  Christ will know you from the fruits you bear.

September 29, 2008

Biden’s “Bridge to TWO Nowheres”

Filed under: Biden, hypocrisy, pork — crushliberalism @ 8:30 am

The Gaffe Machine from DE may want to drink a piping hot mug of STFU about the Bridge to Nowhere.  From (believe it or not) CNN:

GRIFFIN: But hold on Senator Biden. Keeping him honest, we decided to check on 116 reasons in Delaware that one Bridge to Nowhere in Alaska may not be such a good Democratic talking point, because 116 is the number of earmarks Senator Biden asked for this year alone. The total bill to taxpayers more than $342 million. He told our American Morning they are all justified.

BIDEN: Everyone has seen them and we have no Lawrence Welk Museums, we have no Bridges to Nowhere in Delaware. It’s all straight up.

GRIFFIN: Straight up? We went to Delaware to see for ourselves. True, there is no Lawrence Welk Museum, but Biden does want a million dollars for a children’s museum, another million dollars for opera house renovations, hundreds of thousands for this tiny waterfront park, and believe it or not, there’s also a bridge, maybe not to nowhere, but after the tourists have gone this time of year, the Indian River Inlet Bridge can seem like a bridge between two nowheres.

…

GRIFFIN: Now the real twist in this story. Senator Biden must really like bridges, because not only does he want you to help pay to replace this bridge here in Delaware, despite what he’s been saying on the campaign trail, he actually voted for Alaska’s Bridge to Nowhere. Twice. That’s right. He and Senator Barack Obama were among the 93 Senators who voted for the massive 2005 Transportation Bill funding the Alaskan Bridge to Nowhere and thousands of other projects across the country. And when another Senator tried to divert the Bridge to Nowhere money to fix a bridge to New Orleans damaged by Katrina, Senators Biden and Obama and 80 other Senators present voted against the amendment.

ALLISON: Yes, they had a chance to vote specifically against the Bridge to Nowhere in Alaska, to redirect the money, and they chose not to. …

September 23, 2008

Greasy Joe Biden, history buff

Filed under: Biden — crushliberalism @ 11:45 am

Greasy Joe on the stock market crash of 1929:

When the stock market crashed, Franklin Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the princes of greed. He said, “look, here’s what happened.”

That would have been a neat trick for FDR to have gotten on TV to calm the American public…considering that (a) FDR didn’t become president until March of 1933; and (b) televisions weren’t commercially available until nearly a decade after the stock market crash.  Maybe he can save face and claim that he lifted the words off of Neil Kinnock.

Exit question #1: Is Biden trying to gaffe himself off of the ticket to open the door for Her Highness to get on the ticket?

Exit question #2: Anyone else having a flashback to Animal House where Bluto recalls the Germans bombing Pearl Harbor?  He’s rolling, baby!  :lol:

September 15, 2008

Quote of the day, “Bizarre Biden metaphor” edition

Filed under: Biden, bizarre, quote of the day — crushliberalism @ 10:10 am

Oooooooo-kay then.  From Greasy Joe:

When telling the story of how his granddaughters had a slumber party with Barack Obama’s daughters during the week of the Democratic National Convention, Biden equated it to what he says Americans want.

“I believe that’s a metaphor, a metaphor for what the country is looking for. They’re looking for a sleepover with people they like!”

Just keep Bill Clinton and Scott Ritter away from that sleepover, and everything should be hunky-dory.

September 9, 2008

Biden: Republicans don’t care about special needs kids

Filed under: Biden, McCain, Palin, abortion, shameful — crushliberalism @ 7:53 pm

Presumably, the “Sweetie” running on the other side of the ticket doesn’t love or care for her Down’s syndrome child.  This is sleazy for even Greasy Joe’s standards:

Was Joe Biden referring to Sarah Palin, a mother of a child with Down syndrome, when he made this comment?

“I hear all this talk about how the Republicans are going to work in dealing with parents who have both the joy, because there’s joy to it as well, the joy and the difficulty of raising a child who has a developmental disability, who were born with a birth defect. Well guess what folks? If you care about it, why don’t you support stem cell research?”

Biden received a thunderous ovation when he made the remark at a town hall style meeting this morning in Columbia.

Good to see that Greasy Joe is listening to his #1’s suggestion that “kids are off limits” in the campaign.

I’m thinking that Sen. Infanticide doesn’t really want this “who cares about babies?” / “embryonic stem cell research” issue coming up right about now.  If the cretin who opposed the Infants Born Alive Protection bill (for those of you on the left, that was Sen. Obabykiller) was content to let a Down’s syndrome baby die a slow death in a soiled utility closet, it’s safe to say he would have no qualms about killing such a baby in order to harvest his/her stem cells.  Only in Liberal La-la-land does killing a baby to use its stem cells equate to caring for children.

Team McCain-Palin responds:

Barack Obama’s running mate sunk to a new low today launching an offensive debate over who cares more about special needs children. Playing politics with this issue is disturbing and indicative of a desperate campaign.

For the love of God, McCain, run with this sound bite…and run with it far and wide!

Exit question: Can Biden save himself by “confessing” that he’s a serial plagiarist and therefore stole the sickeningly offensive line from someone else?

Biden takes credit for Anbar Awakening

Filed under: Biden, Iraq, shameful — crushliberalism @ 8:38 am

You just can’t make this stuff up!  The same guy who proposed breaking Iraq into three different countries/regions is now claiming credit for the Anbar Awakening.  From Commentary:

No. The surge helped make that–what made is possible in Anbar province is they did what I’d suggested two and a half years ago: gave local control. They turned over and they said to the Sunnis in Anbar province, “We promise you, don’t worry, you’re not going to have any Shia in here. There’s going to be no national forces in here. We’re going to train your forces to help you fight al-Qaeda.” And that you–what you had was the awakening. The awakening was not an awakening by us, it was an awakening of the Sunnis in Anbar province willing to fight.

Unfriggingbelievable!  Dude is shameless in his lies, no?

September 8, 2008

Biden: Life begins at conception, but so what?

Filed under: Biden, abortion, shameful — crushliberalism @ 10:42 am

Greasy Joe over the weekend:

Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., the Democratic nominee for vice president, departed Sunday from party doctrine on abortion rights, declaring that as a Catholic, he believes life begins at conception.
…
In the interview Sunday, Mr. Biden tried to walk the line between the staunch abortion-rights advocates in his party and his own religious beliefs. While he said he did not often talk about his faith, he said of those who disagree with him: “They believe in their faith and they believe in human life, and they have differing views as to when life — I’m prepared as a matter of faith to accept that life begins at the moment of conception.”

Um…as a Catholic, you can’t be “prepared to accept”, idiot.  You must accept!

If he genuinely believes that life begins at conception, but he supports easy access to abortion, then how can anyone come to any conclusion other than Biden doesn’t care about human life?  If he actually believes what he says, then he, by his definition (and not mine), supports murder…period, end of discussion.

So, the exit question is this: Is he lying, or is he a depraved sicko…or both?

September 3, 2008

Biden’s lofty goals for highest office

Filed under: Biden — crushliberalism @ 9:04 pm

I’m gonna be charitable and assume he didn’t plagiarize this observation (via NRO):

Joe Biden, in the Democratic primary, assessing who should serve on the Supreme Court:

I have taken on those justices who, in fact, show no balance — they are ideologues. We have enough ideologues. We have enough professors on the bench. I want someone who ran for dog catcher. I want someone — literally, not a joke. When Hillary’s husband asked me for his advice when he was appointing people, I wanted to go to people and so did he — we couldn’t. Four people turned it down. We wanted to get someone who, in fact, knew what it was to live life.

So let me get this straight… a dog-catcher is qualified to be on the Supreme Court, but a former mayor and recently-elected governor is not qualified for the presidency?

Boy, it sure is a good thing Barry O picked such an esteemed running mate to counterbalance his own skimpy resume.

September 2, 2008

Quote of the day, Huckabee edition

Filed under: Biden, Huckabee, Palin, quote of the day — crushliberalism @ 1:56 pm

Check out Schmuckabee!  From ABC News blog:

In fact I don’t know if you realize this but Sarah Palin got more votes running for mayor in Wasilla, Alaska than Joe Biden did in two quests for the presidency… that oughta tell you something…

Ouch!  Good one, governor.

Biden: Today not a day for politics…well, for McCain, anyway

Filed under: Biden, McCain, hypocrisy — crushliberalism @ 7:52 am

What a scumbag.  From MSNBC:

This morning, Joe Biden said today was not a day for national politics. He said it again during a roundtable discussion outside his childhood home here this afternoon. But before long, he couldn’t help himself, criticizing McCain for his views on offshore drilling and questioning his foreign policy judgment.

“The only guy in America in a position of some authority who is out of sync with the whole rest of the world is John McCain,” he told a small group of relatives and old family friends. “This Administration, the Iraqis, NATO, the Europeans, our friends around the world, the vast majority of the American people, the Democratic-controlled Congress, Republicans in Congress — they all agree. Barack Obama was right, and John McCain was wrong.”

Good enough for me, but not for…um, me.

August 25, 2008

Left’s spin: Biden’s racism an “asset”

Filed under: Biden, bigotry, hypocrisy, media bias, shameful — crushliberalism @ 12:28 pm

The left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) are already in spin cycle mode over the selection of Greasy Joe Biden to The One’s campaign.  From Ace:

There is spin, and then there is spin: a CNBC/NYT reporter claims that Joe Biden’s occasional bursts of old-school dumb-but-not-hateful racism are actually “refreshing” and “an asset.”

Need I remind anyone that for months the left has been DaVinci Codebreaking every John McCain advertisement for so-called “coded racism.” And they were not praising such “coded racism” as “refreshing” or charming in the least.

Rather the opposite.

But when Joe Biden is genuinely, pleasantly surprised that an African-American manages to wash himself on occasion, it’s a good thing! It just shows, I guess, that he’s “relatable” to all those Racist Older White voters. I guess the idea is that Joe Biden can make the case, “Hey, I’m as surprised as you all are to be running with a darkie. But I have to tell you — he’s one of the ‘good ones,’ like Cosby or Byron Allen. He’s like the new, family-friendly Ice Cube, not the old, angry Ice Cube that your daughter would date to get back at you for not buying her that Mini Cooper she wanted.”

Brilliant.

There’s more, and it’s all good stuff.  I know, I know…that’s two from Ace today.  Sorry, but the guy nails it, plus he’s funny as heck…deal with it.  :)

Quote of the day, Biden edition

Filed under: Biden, quote of the day — crushliberalism @ 12:19 pm

BEVERAGE ALERT!  Ace has this to say about The One’s apostle, the gaffe-o-meter Greasy Joe:

Joe Biden is a scatterbrained and socially awkward guy. He’s the guy at the party who announces, out of nowhere, “I just had some subcutaneous fat injected into my penis to increase its girth, so that’s pretty good.”

And then… the uncomfortable silence as everyone takes keen regard of their shoes and watches.

We’re gonna have fun.

:lol:

Biden bits about the blogosphere

Filed under: Biden, Obama — crushliberalism @ 9:13 am

The Obamessiah picked his disciple last week: Joe Biden (Plagiarist-DE), a clean articulate guy from reliably blue Delaware.  They might want to avoid campaigning at 7-11 stores, though.  What are we seeing about the blogosphere regarding the pick?

  • Reminders that Greasy Joe thinks Iowa schools do better than DC schools due to the lack of blacks in Iowa.
  • Reminders that Greasy Joe, being the “foreign policy guru” that Barry O needs him to be, didn’t notice any “bad guys” in Iraq.
  • Barry O must not have vetted his mate very well, because Biden’s got ties to his son’s lobbying firm.
  • Biden can at least take some credit for uniting Iraqis of different sects.  Greasy Joe, being the “foreign policy guru”, came up with the craptastic idea of partitioning Iraq into three different countries.  That idea was so bad that Iraqis of different blocs (Sunnis, Shias, Kurds) united in their opposition, and they credit Biden’s horrendous idea for their unity.  But I’m sure that was his goal, right?
  • McCain’s got an ad where Biden himself criticized Obama’s lack of experience, and heaped praised upon McCain.  What a difference a VP slot makes, huh?
  • Greasy Joe, being the “foreign policy guru”, thought in the wake of 9/11 that we should send the Iranians a $200 million blank check to prove to the Arab world that we weren’t going to kill them all.  Ignoring the faux pas that Iranians aren’t Arabs (maybe all those “clean, articulate” brown people look alike to him?), did anyone clue Capt. Oblivious in to the fact that Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism who is intent on getting nuclear weapons?

I’m not suggesting that a bad VP pick is necessarily going to sink a candidate.  After all, Bush’s dad survived the 1988 election with Dan Quayle.  But man, this ought to be a hoot!

July 15, 2008

Biden: Iraq is “bad guy”-free

Filed under: Afghanistan, Biden, Iraq, shameful — crushliberalism @ 10:37 pm

This would be a candidate for “Quote of the Day”, but Dean Barnett already beat me to it:

If we had a “Most Offensive Quote of the Day” every day, Joe Biden would probably come to own the prize. But even by the senator’s lofty standards of chronic obtuseness, he outdid himself this afternoon:

“If John (McCain) wants to know where the bad guys live, come back with me to Afghanistan. We know where they reside. And it’s not in Iraq.”

I know Democrats get a certain tingling in their thighs when their politicos talk butch (”talk butch”…I love it! LOL! – Ed.) in such a manner, but this comment is so over the top, somewhere in America Wesley Clark is probably feeling much better about his public relations acumen. What’s more, Biden’s comment turns what ought to be a serious conversation about two vital foreign theatres into a juvenile schoolyard taunt.

I have a suggestion for the senator: Perhaps he could bring his newly benign assessment to our soldiers who are serving in Iraq and the veterans who have served there. It would surely come as a huge relief to our soldiers currently in Iraq that their work has suddenly become “bad guy free.” Perhaps Biden should also bring his crass bad-guy-appraisal to the attention of all of the Iraqis who have stood by us and who, like our soldiers, have given and still are giving so much for that nation’s freedom. …

But hey…Plagiarist Joe “supports the troops”, right?

November 9, 2007

Biden: Dems think you’re stupid

Filed under: Biden, big government — crushliberalism @ 9:01 am

All that Greasy Joe Plagiarism is doing here is telling us what we already knew: Democrats think they’re smart and that the American people are stupid.  From the Andrew Cline:

Sen. Joe Biden said in an interview at the New Hampshire Union Leader this afternoon that too many Democrats, including the frontrunners for the presidential nomination, do not have faith in the American people.

“We’ve got to trust the American people more,” Biden said.

“I think they’ve really lost faith in the American people in terms of leveling with them,” he said of his leading rivals.

When he asks groups of Democrats if they think the American people are stupid because they elected George W. Bush twice, most respond that, yes, they do, he said. He said he thinks that attitude is a real problem for the Democrats, who fail to understand how smart and pragmatic the American people really are. 

Sure, Biden is being a little bit disingenuous, since he has that same air of elitism that he accuses his liberal brethren of having.  However, he is still correct in his inference that liberals think Americans are stupid.  I guess that’s why they support Big Government the way they do: to keep us idjuts from hurting ourselves.

October 26, 2007

Biden: Iowa schools better than DC schools due to fewer blacks

Filed under: Biden, bigotry — crushliberalism @ 8:32 am

When he’s not waxing eloquent about the clean, bright, articulate Negro in the race or about the prevelance of Indians at 7-11 stores, he’s busy explaining how Iowan kids do better in schools than those in the nation’s capital.  From CNN’s blog:

In what the Washington Post is describing as a “stumble,” Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden said in an interview with the paper Wednesday that Washington’s high minority population is one of the reasons for the city’s education problems.

Explaining why schools in Iowa are performing better than those in Washington, D.C., Biden told the Post, “There’s less than one percent of the population of Iowa that is African American. There is probably less than four of five percent that are minorities. What is in Washington? So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you’re dealing with.”

Exit question (and yes, I know you see this one coming): What would the level of outrage been had, say, Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani or “Teh Fred” said the same thing?

February 1, 2007

Night & Day: "Oops" vs. "Slur"

Filed under: Biden, Night and Day, media bias — crushliberalism @ 10:20 am

Today’s N&D courtesy of Newsbusters:

Democratic presidential candidate (for now, anyway) Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware got headlines for all the wrong reasons yesterday when he referred to Sen. Barack Obama, who’s also running for president, as “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy” in an interview with the New York Observer.

“Biden Unwraps His Bid for ‘08 With an Oops!” read the headline over Adam Nagourney’s Thursday story in the New York Times. Credit the Times for putting it on the front page, and to Nagourney for bringing up Biden’s equally strange comment last summer that aired on C-Span: “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.”

But as NewsBusters’ Mark Finkelstein noted, the Times’ headline does give Biden the benefit of the doubt that the remark was simply an “oops!,” a gaffe, and not a reflection of Biden’s real feelings toward blacks.

Back in 1995, when then-House Majority Leader Dick Armey, a conservative Republican, called gay Democratic congressman Barney Frank “Barney Fag” (Armey immediately corrected himself and later apologized to Frank) he didn’t get the benefit of the doubt from Times’ headline writers. The headline to a front-page story back on January 28, 1995 made it clear that Armey intended to “slur” his colleague, no “oops!” about it: “No. 2 House Leader Refers to Colleague With Anti-Gay Slur.”

Nope…no liberal media bias!

Quote of the day

Filed under: Biden, quote of the day — crushliberalism @ 5:54 am

Though I dislike Al Sharpton for his race-baiting and moonbattery, he’s good for a chuckle every once in a while. Here’s Al Sharpton responding to Biden’s comment yesterday that Sen. Barack Obama is “the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean”:

Mr. Sharpton said that when Mr. Biden called him to apologize, Mr. Sharpton started off the conversation reassuring Mr. Biden about his hygienic practices. “I told him I take a bath every day,” Mr. Sharpton said.

Touché, Rev. Al.

By the way, this isn’t the first time that Biden has stepped in it. Last year, the plagiarist from Delaware made remarks about Indians, saying that “you cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.” And the left accuses the right of prejudice? Pots and kettles and whatnot.

January 31, 2007

Biden starts (and destroys) campaign in one day!

Filed under: Biden, media bias — crushliberalism @ 9:19 am

Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) officially kicked off his campaign today. However, it looks like he may have ended it today, too. From the New York Observer:

Senator Joseph Biden doesn’t think highly of the Iraq policies of some of the other Democrats who are running for President.

To hear him tell it, Hillary Clinton’s position is calibrated, confusing and “a very bad idea.” John Edwards doesn’t know what he’s talking about and is pushing a recipe for Armageddon in the Middle East. Barack Obama is offering charming but insubstantial fluff. And all of them are playing politics.
…
Mr. Biden is equally skeptical—albeit in a slightly more backhanded way—about Mr. Obama. “I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” he said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”

The…what?? The “first” mainstream black guy who’s smart and articulate and clean? Holy shizit, does anyone have any freakin’ doubts as to how the MSM would have ravaged the plagiarist from Delaware had he been a Republican?

This story is in the New York Observer. As of this morning (and of course, that could change later on), most other MSM outlets are quieter than Monica Lewinsky in her presidential kneepads under the Oval Office desk. Were Biden a Republican, he’d already be “fried, died, and laid to the side”, would he not? However, we can look at the MSM’s failure to immediately report on this as further evidence of their leftist bias.

UPDATE (1/31/2007 – 4:35 p.m.): ABC News is finally reporting on it…and predictably blaming the evil “conservatives” for the fallout. Yeah, I’m sure Karl Rove and Rush Limbaugh beamed the thoughts into Biden’s brain. Then again, since he’s already a known plagiarist, Biden could always say he was simply parroting someone else’s words without proper attribution, right?

Blog at WordPress.com.