Crush Liberalism

June 29, 2009

Supreme Court overtuns Sotomayor’s bigoted ruling

Filed under: Supreme Court, bigotry, political correctness — crushliberalism @ 10:44 am

No doubt many of you are aware of the case in New Haven, CT, where a firefighter exam’s results were tossed out because no black firemen passed the test.  The white firefighters who passed sued, arguing that they were discriminated against because of their race.  It’s obvious to anyone with half a brain that they were right.  So of course, the liberal appeals court told them to stick it up their white chutes (or whatever the legalese equivalent of that is).  SCOTUS nominee Sonia Sotomayor ruled against the firefighters and in favor of racism.

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the liberal court, on a predictable 5-4 ruling, with the four liberal justices naturally and reflexively siding with racism.

Exit question: Does this put a dent in Sotomayor’s claim that by virtue of her being a “wise Latina woman”, she will reach “better conclusions” than non-Latin males?

June 12, 2009

Holocaust Museum killer a “right-wing” fanatic?

Filed under: anti-Semitism, bigotry, hypocrisy, media bias — crushliberalism @ 8:08 am

Admittedly, I came to that conclusion when the story first broke.  Then an interesting phenomenon occurred: facts came out.  First this:

FBI agents visited the offices of the conservative Weekly Standard magazine yesterday after a shooting at the Holocaust Memorial Museum and told employees they’d found the magazine’s address.

The suggestion that the Standard may have been a target complicates any view of the racist shooter in contemporary left-right terms. Von Brunn’s white supremacist roots put him under the rubric of a “right-wing extremist,” but the substance of his views — which included everything from believing that President Bush may have been in on the September 11 attacks to denying that President Obama is an American citizen — are too far on the fringe to fit into conventional political classification.

And this:

Andrew Breitbart
“F.U. MSM: This Holocaust Museum killer creep job was a 9/11 truther (a left-wing phenomenon), hated Neo-Cons (Jews like me,) Bush, McCain and hated the right’s beloved Israel (also a leftist phenomenon, mostly) — and you — in conjunction with the Democratic Party try to say he is an example of the ‘far right’ that is against Obama — all for the sickening sake of political gain? We won’t forget this, you thugs.”

And this:

The media is a abuzed about this, and the lefty blogs are acting as though this being some nuance of the right.

Wrong. Let’s not forget that Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Louis Farrakhan, both antisemitic and neither considered spokesmen for the right.

But after some research it appears the shooter, James Von Brunn is in fact – despite the protestations of the Kos Kids – a registered democrat from Maryland.

So much for the “Right Wing Conspiracy”.

Yet the MSM still parrots the lie that this nutjob was a “right-wing fanatic”?  I’m not saying he was a left-wing nutjob, merely that he was just a nutjob…period.  But if the left really wants to play “pin the ideology on the psycho”, we’ve got plenty of ammo to work with, m’kay?

Also, did you notice that the MSM reported ad nauseum on the abortion doctor killing and this Holocaust Museum killing, but reports on the home-grown Muslim terrorist shooting the Army recruiters were not nearly as extensive?

Nope…no liberal media bias!

June 5, 2009

Week’s ending review

Filed under: Obama, Supreme Court, bigotry, illegal immigration, media bias — crushliberalism @ 9:52 am

B.O.’s SCOTUS nominee, we are told, made this one isolated reference to female Hispanic making better decisions than men of any race.  If, by “isolated”, they mean “she’s said it on multiple occasions“, then yeah…”isolated”!

When he’s not busy shilling for criminal aliens, Sometimes-Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham likes to spend his time pacifying the base by slamming Sotomayor’s racist words.  I’m not sure why he’s got such a problem with her, since she was a member of the Hispanic supremacist group La Raza…the same La Raza that Graham appeared before to “tell the bigots to shut up” about criminal immigration.

Quote of the week by filmmaker John Ziegler, who has put out a movie called “Media Malpractice” about the Kamikaze Media’s coverage of the 2008 election: “Monica Lewinsky never dreamed of doing to Bill Clinton some of the things Brian Williams did to Barack Obama”!  Heh.

When unemployment was 5% during the Bush years, the MSM howled.  Now that it’s doubled under The One’s watch, the MSM spins unemployment as “fun”…”funemployment“!  Please pick your jaw up off the floor long enough to say “Nope…no liberal media bias!”  I’m guessing the Second Great Depression will be “Funpression #2″, maybe?

Obama said the Holocaust is bad, but then implies that it’s no worse than what those d#mned Joooooos are doing to the poor, innocent, peaceful “Palestinians” every day.  Moral equivalency: it’s not just for dinner anymore.

May 29, 2009

Obama lets Black Panters off the hook for violent intimidation charges

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, corruption, shameful, vote fraud — crushliberalism @ 12:30 pm

Just helpin’ a couple of bruthas out, right?  Details:

Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.

The incident – which gained national attention when it was captured on videotape and distributed on YouTube – had prompted the government to sue the men, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring would-be voters with the weapon, racial slurs and military-style uniforms.

Career lawyers pursued the case for months, including obtaining an affidavit from a prominent 1960s civil rights activist who witnessed the confrontation and described it as “the most blatant form of voter intimidation” that he had seen, even during the voting rights crisis in Mississippi a half-century ago.

The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.

A Justice Department spokesman on Thursday confirmed that the agency had dropped the case, dismissing two of the men from the lawsuit with no penalty and winning an order against the third man that simply prohibits him from bringing a weapon to a polling place in future elections.  (Are we to assume that it was legal for him to bring a weapon to a polling place BEFORE this order? – Ed.)

The complaint said the three men engaged in “coercion, threats and intimidation, … racial threats and insults, … menacing and intimidating gestures, … and movements directed at individuals who were present to vote.” It said that unless prohibited by court sanctions, they would “continued to violate … the Voting Rights Act by continuing to direct intimidation, threats and coercion at voters and potential voters, by again deploying uniformed and armed members at the entrance to polling locations in future elections, both in Philadelphia and throughout the country.”

To support its evidence, the government had secured an affidavit from Bartle Bull, a longtime civil rights activist and former aide to Sen. Robert F. Kennedy’s 1968 presidential campaign. Mr. Bull said in a sworn statement dated April 7 that he was serving in November as a credentialed poll watcher in Philadelphia when he saw the three uniformed Panthers confront and intimidate voters with a nightstick.

Inexplicably, the government did not enter the affidavit in the court case, according to the files.  (I’m sure it was just a mere bureaucratic snafu, right? – Ed.)

“In my opinion, the men created an intimidating presence at the entrance to a poll,” he declared. “In all my experience in politics, in civil rights litigation and in my efforts in the 1960s to secure the right to vote in Mississippi … I have never encountered or heard of another instance in the United States where armed and uniformed men blocked the entrance to a polling location.”

Mr. Bull said the “clear purpose” of what the Panthers were doing was to “intimidate voters with whom they did not agree.” He also said he overheard one of the men tell a white poll watcher: “You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.”  (Word, dawg. – Ed.)

A Democrat, using the DOJ as a political pawn?  Who knew?

The “postracial” Chicagoland Thug-in-Chief, just lookin’ out for his vote fraud homies like these punks, plus ACORN, plus…well, you get the drift.

May 28, 2009

Midweek news bytes

Filed under: Blagojevich, big government, bigotry, corruption, economic ignorance, shameful, socialism, taxes — crushliberalism @ 10:31 am

The One’s promises should come with expiration dates, because he is once again leaning towards breaking his “no one under $250k will pay any new taxes of any kind” line.  It appears that a national sales tax is being considered.  Not like the Fair Tax, which would replace the income tax with a retail sales tax.  No, this “value-added” sales tax would be in addition to the federal income tax!  Hey, socialism doesn’t pay for itself, folks!  Exit question: how crazy do those tea party people look now, MSM?

In what amounts to a huge coinkidink, all of the closed Chrysler dealerships (so ordered by the administration…er, Chrysler) just so happened to be Republican-owned dealerships, while Dem dealerships owned by big donors just so happened to be left open to operate.  Heck, even 5-star money-making dealerships were closed, if the owner happened to be Republican.  But I’m sure B.O. isn’t a petty “I won” Chicago-style thug politician or anything!  Are you liberals content with that kind of shameful corruption, so long as it comes from your boy?

Arlen Specter (D-PA) left the GOP because he didn’t want to be defeated in the GOP primary, which he would have.  So in a delicious exhibition of karma, he finds himself with a Democrat primary challenger!  Heck, I’m almost tempted to send in a donation to a liberal for once in my life!  :lol:

It looks like Roland Burris did buy that Senate seat from the impeached Democrat governor from IL.  If Burris survives until the 2010 election, the GOP will actually do the unthinkable: pick up a Senate seat…and in a blue state, no less!  I doubt the Dems will let Burris get that far.

Oprompter’s SCOTUS nominee ruled recently, along with her appealate court colleagues, that New Haven, CT, can discriminate against white firefighters.  The SCOTUS will hear the appeal and rule on it by the end of their term, and possibly before her confirmation hearing.  If she has her ruling overturned, will it hurt her confirmation process?  After all, there are some red-state Dems in the Senate (both Senators from AR, MT, ND, as well as Senators from NE, LA, and SD) who will have to answer to their constituents on why they voted to confirm a racist anti-Second Amendment leftist ideologue to the court.

MD raised tax rates on millionaires.  In a totally unforseen development, the rich said “Enough!” and got the hell out of MD, leaving MD with a shortfall that only an economic illiterate wouldn’t see coming.  Hey, who knew?  (For those of you on the left, the prior sentence was both rhetorical and sarcastic.)

Bill “Just Some Dude In My Neighborhood” Ayers ghost wrote B.O.’s Dreams From My Father.  What an honor!  It’s not everyday you can get a domestic terrorist to pen your bestseller, right?

December 27, 2008

The left’s selective outrage, example #4,236,745

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, hypocrisy — crushliberalism @ 12:13 pm

Excellent cartoon and analysis.  The cartoon is from Jim Morin of Miami’s fishwrap:

wright-warren

Ed adds his commentary:

Let’s get this straight.  The Left shrugged at Obama’s twenty years of alliance with a minister who spouted an infamous “God Damn America”.  They sniffed when Jeremiah Wright called 9/11 “America’s chickens coming home to roost”.  They may have even nodded their heads in agreement when the pastor to whom Obama gave over $20,000 in 2006 accused the US government of creating the HIV virus and AIDS as a genocidal tool against people of color.

However, Rick Warren offers public support for a California proposition that keeps marriage defined as his faith prescribes, and suddenly Obama has betrayed their trust.  Really?  They see a one-time association over a 60-second invocation as a betrayal of their values, when Obama’s twenty years with, and significant material support for, a raving anti-American demagogue like Wright didn’t disturb them in the least?

At least we know where their values lie.

If you have not yet done so, feel free to question the left’s patriotism…or their sanity.

November 25, 2008

Canuck university kills cystic fibrosis fundraiser

Filed under: Canucks, bigotry, shameful — crushliberalism @ 6:50 pm

Why would they do that?  Because according to the Canucks at this school of “higher” learning, the victims of cystic fibrosis are all a bit too caucasian for their liking.  Details from Canuckistan:

The Carleton University Students’ Association has voted to drop cystic fibrosis as the beneficiary of its annual Shinearama fundraiser, arguing that the illness is not “inclusive” enough.

Cystic fibrosis “has been recently revealed to only affect white people, and primarily men” said the motion read to student councillors, who voted almost unanimously in favour of it.

Carleton students have fanned out across the city near the beginning of the school year to raise money to fight the illness for years. But according to the motion read Monday night to student councillors, “all orientees and volunteers should feel like their fundraising efforts will serve the their (sic) diverse communities.”

Mr. Bergamini said the orientation week fundraiser, which is carried out by students at many universities across Canada, raised about $1-million last year. Shinearama has raised money for cystic fibrosis research for more than 25 years.

“I think they see this, in their own twisted way, as a win for diversity,” said Mr. Bergamini. “I see it as a loss for people with cystic fibrosis.”

Meanwhile, he said the vote was an example of political correctness gone too far in student government.  (Ya think??? – Ed.)

The fact that C.F. does NOT kill only white people notwithstanding, what kind of depravity must one suffer from to where skin color of the victims of a heinous disease ever enters the thought process?  How would you sick Canucks like to stand in front of God Almighty on the day of your judgment and tell Him that you would have been glad to aid His children suffering from C.F. if only He had given them greater pigmentation?

Hey, let’s take this a step further, shall we?  How about not holding any fundraisers for breast cancer, since over 99% of the victims are female?  I mean, that’s not “inclusive”, now is it?  Or what about sickle cell anemia, since that primarily affects the black community?  The possibilities are endless!

And liberals think that we need to emulate the Canucks?  No thanks!

November 21, 2008

Another “Whitey” conspiracy revealed: a technological device is “racist”

Filed under: ambulance chasers, bigotry, bizarre — crushliberalism @ 8:51 am

Oh. My. Stars.  From Connectikook:

A lawyer representing a man charged with drunken driving has claimed Connecticut’s breathalyzers discriminate against blacks.

Attorney James Ruane represents 40-year-old Tyrone Brown, of Norwalk, who was arrested April 9 by Connecticut State Police on Interstate 95 in Fairfield.

In a motion filed Tuesday in Bridgeport Superior Court, Ruane asked a judge to suppress his client’s breathalyzer test results.

He contends the device used by state police and most local police departments, the Intoxilyzer 5000, discriminates against blacks.

Ruane said research shows the lung capacity of a black man is 3 percent lower than a white man’s and, therefore, black men’s test results vary from the sobriety standard set by the device.

Assistant State’s Attorney Mark Durso declined comment. 

Lower lung capacity?  Has dude never seen a black man run with the football, flee from the po-po, or shatter Olympic sprint records?

Seriously, I may have officially just seen it all.  A machine that measures drunkenness is racist?  Not the engineers or the designers of the machine, but the machine itself is racist?

Exit question:  Can we infer that the ambulance chaser making this claim is racist by implying that blacks get drunk (then get behind the wheel) more often than non-blacks?

October 31, 2008

Effigies, nooses, and double standards

Filed under: "hate crimes", Obama, Palin, bigotry, hypocrisy, moonbats, shameful — crushliberalism @ 6:32 am

Many of you may have seen this from Hollywood last week:

An effigy of US Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin hanging by a noose as part of a Halloween display has drawn severe criticism, but local officials said the homeowner was covered by free speech rights.

“We have been getting some phone calls complaining about it but if (the homeowner) isn’t in violation of municipal code we have no reason to cite them,” West Hollywood spokeswoman Helen Goss said.”

People have First Amendment rights (to free speech),” Goss said. “I would speculate that if it’s part of a Halloween display then its political satire.”

And then yesterday:

Two men have been arrested in connection with an effigy of Sen. Barack Obama that was hung outside a building at the University of Kentucky in Lexington, police said Thursday.

Authorities found a life-size effigy of the Democratic presidential candidate hanging from a tree outside the school’s Mines and Minerals building on Wednesday morning, police said.

This was a serious incident. It caused a lot of wounds to be opened from racial tension,” Monroe said. …

Personally, I think both sides here ought to be ashamed of themselves.  But just to make sure I’m understanding this correctly:

Hanging an effigy of Sarah Palin from a noose?  Why, that’s just chortle-provoking, side-splitting, satirical hilarity right there, all in good fun.  And legal, too. First Amendment rights and whatnot.

Hanging an effigy of The One?  Latent KKK tendencies coming to the surface in these little Hitler clones!  And illegal, too. First Amendment rights? Never heard of them.

The moral of the story?  The next time you feel like swinging an effigy from a noose to make a political point, pick a white female doll to hang.  Bonus points if the doll represents a Republican.

Exit question: When did the “free speech rights” of the first group stop existing for the second group?

October 30, 2008

Cartoon of the day

Filed under: Obama, bigotry — crushliberalism @ 9:33 am

Ain’t that the truth!  From Michael Ramirez:

October 29, 2008

Frank: You’re mad at me not for tanking the economy, but for being a pole-smoker

Filed under: Barney Frank, McCain, bigotry, gay — crushliberalism @ 5:45 pm

McCain criticizes Frank for his contribution to the financial mess, and Frank whips out (OK, bad choice of words!)…yep…the “gay card”!

Frank yesterday dismissed McCain’s words as “an appeal to prejudice” that he said reminded him of past Republican efforts to raise voter concerns about the prospect of congressmen Charles Rangel and John Conyers, who are black, becoming committee chairs.

“I’m flattered by this,” said Frank, who is gay. “But I don’t think I’m the single most important member of the House after Nancy Pelosi. There are also a lot of straight white men who are committee chairmen.”

McCain’s chief speechwriter, Mark Salter, shook his head when asked to respond. “We’re bringing him up for his quotes,” said Salter. “We’re prejudiced against wasteful spenders and tax hikers.”

Is it possible that we’re a little torqued that Barney Frank was bouncing Fannie Mae orbs off his chin while going to bat for Fannie/Freddie during his day job?  Maybe we’re a bit bent that he and his ilk have destroyed our economy, especially the mortgage sector?  Perhaps we detest his socialist “let’s tax the rich more and gut the Defense Dept. budget” words of wisdom?

Nah.  We’re OK with all that trivial stuff.  No, our hang-up is that he likes man-meat up his squeakhole.  Darn it, he’s got us figured out!  :lol:

“Vote black?”

Filed under: Christianity, Obama, bigotry — crushliberalism @ 8:15 am

Thanks to Kanaka Girl for passing this on.  Please take the time to read this blog post by G. Craige Lewis, a black minister who sees the dangers and evils of voting for Obama.  Excerpts:

The 2008 Hip Hop Awards came on the other day and it proved one thing to me. Some black folks will be dumb until Jesus comes back! How can anyone look at pimps, thugs, and gangsters as a good thing that needs to be celebrated? How did Hip Hop become the voice of our youth to the point that the black church is bending over backwards for it’s acceptance? This is a shame. But one thing that they did on this show that really got me going was the push for a “black” vote in the election. Not knowing the issues at hand, but yet and still, they constantly pushed the young folks and HIp Hop fans to “vote black” this election.

How embarrassing! These folks undid everything that Dr. Martin Luther King dreamed of in one dumb hour! They took apart his dream and the civil rights movement by pointing to the black candidate as the mandatory vote of black people. This is sad. Martin Luther King said that he dreamed of the day when people would not be judged by the color of their skin, but the content of their character! How can you say, “vote black” and not go against that dream? Just because an african man mixed with white is running does not mean he is the right choice or the only choice for black people. We are moving to the back of the bus again and we don’t even see it. As far as straight politics goes, Blacks are the only race of people that are not bipartisan. We have been conditioned to be on one side and never split our vote. Other races and ethnic groups including, hispanics, catholics, and jews put people on both sides of the ticket for leverage and a voice no matter how the pendulum swings. But blacks stay at the back of the bus and don’t spread out so when we lose, we lose our voice and power. That’s slave mentality. …

Biblical perspectives abound in this post, too:

…I’m sorry folks, but we can’t stay on this road. This is the road that leads to the accepting of the mark of the beast. This is the road that hides the truth and promotes the lie. This road will get you voting for economics rather than morality. And that’s the road that will lead to the antichrist! The bible said that in the end, you will not be able to buy or sell unless you pledge your allegiance to the beast! Buy or sell? That’s economics. Thats money! And if you are voting for economic reasons and not considering morality or your own convictions, then you are essentially doing exactly what the bible predicts will happen in the end. People will begin to vote in the man that will lead us to the antichrist and the end. They will vote this man in based on economic issues and popularity. He will be voted in because of the financial crisis of the government and people will not even consider his true moral ethics. Black Christian leaders have totally abandoned the bible in this election. They have chosen culture over Christ and have accepted the 3 things that the antichrist will implement in his rule. Abortion, Homosexuality, and the silencing of the truth! These things are on the table and being ignored because of the color of a man’s skin?

…God forbid! I will not be guilty of ushering in the antichrists policies because a man is of color! I am not practicing to receive the mark of the beast. And if you are voting against your own beliefs and bible for the sake of money, color, or party biases, then you have just passed the mark of the beast test. You have just proven that socialistic reasons supersede your spiritual convictions! And this is exactly what the antichrist will do. He will exalt himself above God and make his immoral beliefs acceptable by all. And without question we see that Barack Obama has caused preachers and pastors, great and small, to follow him in spite of his antichrist morals. Abortion, homosexuality, and the silencing of the church are on his ticket and yet black church folks don’t care. The very things that are killing us as a people are the very things that we are in favor of. The scariest part is that this is just rehearsal for the coming rule of the antichrist and the black church has lined up on the wrong side! I’m not saying that McCain is the answer, but I’m saying that if you are voting, your convictions as a believer in the bible should out weigh every thing else.

Congrats to people like jen who have decided to cast their lot with the mark of the beast.  Good luck explaining that one to the Almighty.

This final point is one that I have tried to make clear:

It’s late in the hour and Jesus is taking notes on where you stand. Your vote is your stand. And it would be better to not vote at all than to cast a vote for the very agenda that the antichrist will promote. 

Amen, fellow Brother in Christ!  If you have moral objections to voting for McCain, then by all means, do NOT vote for him!  But as I mentioned before, you cannot call yourself a born-again Christian and vote for Obama.  Period, end of discussion.

Please read the post…it’s excellent reading!

October 24, 2008

Obama race-baiting circa 1995

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, hypocrisy, socialism — crushliberalism @ 8:19 am

The Uniter, a post-racial guy?  Pffffft.

The One may swear that Rev. Wright isn’t the Rev. Wright he thought he knew, but this video clip from 1995 sounds like Wright’s racist attitudes were ingrained in Uhhhhhhhh-bama’s personality:

Obama talks redistribution and salvation:

Obama admits his Redistribution of Wealth is to SAVE the African American community SO HE CAN ENSURE HIS OWN SALVATION! (and Our Countries Salvation) He compares the plight of African Americas to the ethic genocide’s of Bosnia and Africa. He blames all of African American’s problems on “ONE GROUP” who suppresses them. And He says WHITE people don’t want their taxes to help black children.

Obviously, Obama’s plans to redistribute wealth is not something he just thought up.

Funny- This is the same millionaire who won’t send his brother living in a slum hut 20 bucks.

October 22, 2008

New code word for racist: “socialist”

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, media bias, shameful, socialism — crushliberalism @ 7:10 am

Just when you thought that there were no more creative ways to cry “wolf”, an unlikely racist term emerges: socialist.

That the father of modern socialism, Karl Marx, was a white dude is apparently irrelevant.  Additionally irrelevant is the fact that the only openly socialist in the Senate, Bernie Sanders from the People’s Republic of Vermont, is white.  Hitler?  White.

Basically, when you think of socialists, it’s usually white guys whose names pop into your heads.  Ergo, in leftist la-la-land, that must be racism.

October 20, 2008

UPDATE: Obligatory “Powell endorses Obama” post

Filed under: Obama, affirmative action, bigotry, hypocrisy — crushliberalism @ 10:28 am

UPDATES BELOW.

Yawn!  This was hinted at back in August.  Is this a game-changer?  I doubt it.

I’m not going to knock Powell for endorsing the candidate of his choice.  What I am going to knock, though, is his candor, or lack thereof.  He claims that Obama’s race has nothing to do with his endorsement, and I think that is a bit disingenuous of a claim.

First of all, Powell is a big-time proponent of affirmative action.  He got on the stage at the 2004 GOP convention and defended AA with gusto.  That disappointed me, because that defense was basically implying that he got to where he did in his life and career as a result of AA, not on his own merits.  Clearly, he’s got a racial component to his worldview.

Secondly, Powell told a bunch of college kids at GWU last month how awesomely McAwesome it would be if we elected a black president.  “Electrifying”, to use his words.  Apparently, Powell feels that any black president, even a socialist one, would do.

Ace summarizes Powell thusly:

Colin Powell was never a Republican. He was a military officer who knew how to play the political game during a period dominated by Republicans. Of course he kissed Republican ass. Just as he kissed Bob Woodward’s ass to make sure he always came out smelling like roses in his books.

The Republican Party has always used Powell, just as he’s used us in turn. We have promoted this dubious figure as — let’s admit it — a bit of a token, proof that black people like us.

But he’s never been on our side. He’s always been a liberal, and, moreover, he’s always been on Colin Powell’s side.

Exit question, redux:  As was asked back in August, don’t you think it’s kind of funny that the same liberals who accused Powell of “lying us into Iraq” now embrace his endorsement?

UPDATE (10/20/2008 – 10:28 A.M. EST):  Brian Maloney thinks that the endorsement may backfire in that it revives the race issue, and that many Americans may resent Powell endorsing a gay simply because of his skin color.  I disagree: I think Powell is irrelevant, and that he will influence no one’s vote.

Biden: Undecided voters are racist

Filed under: Biden, San Franistan, bigotry, shameful — crushliberalism @ 8:31 am

When The One isn’t busy lamenting “clingy, bitter, racist, xenophobic” voters while campaigning in San Fransicko, his running mate likes to do the same thing in that modern day Sodom and Gomorrah.  From Greasy Joe:

Undecided people are having a difficult time just culturally making the change, making the move for the first African American president in the history of the United States of America,” the Democratic vice-presidential nominee said at a San Francisco fundraiser Saturday evening.

October 13, 2008

CNN to black McCain supporter: Hey, why aren’t you on the plantation?

Filed under: CNN, bigotry, hypocrisy, media bias — crushliberalism @ 1:23 pm

The CNN deathbed media mouthpiece says the brother should support Obama “in light of the recent tone” in McCain’s campaign.  In other words, McCain pointing out Obama’s shady friends and his economic ignorance is “racist”.  Nothing nearly as racist as, say, implying that a black man should just de facto be voting for Obama.

Nope…no liberal media bias!

October 6, 2008

Obama receives illegal foreign contributions, but expecting him to follow the law is racist?

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, corruption, media bias, shameful — crushliberalism @ 7:58 am

Accepting foreign contributions is illegal.  Pointing out that it is illegal, though, is…yep, you guessed it…racist.

Could someone on the left please point out what is racially acceptable criticism of Obama and what is not?  Because I’m of the distinct impression that any criticism these days of The One of Supremely Thin Skin and Shady Connections is racist…though I’m not sure what would give me that idea.

Again I ask: see why I’m sick of politics?

September 29, 2008

“Community organizers” destroyed mortgage market, financial sector

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, economic ignorance, moonbats, vote fraud — crushliberalism @ 11:11 am

This is what happens when political correctness rules over sound economic practices.  Let that vote fraud front group ACORN get a hold of us, and watch the economy tank.  From NY Post:

WHAT exactly does a “community organizer” do? Barack Obama’s rise has left many Americans asking themselves that question. Here’s a big part of the answer: Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit.

In the name of fairness to minorities, community organizers occupy private offices, chant inside bank lobbies, and confront executives at their homes – and thereby force financial institutions to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages to low-credit customers.

In other words, community organizers help to undermine the US economy by pushing the banking system into a sinkhole of bad loans. And Obama has spent years training and funding the organizers who do it.

THE seeds of today’s financial meltdown lie in the Community Reinvestment Act – a law passed in 1977 and made riskier by unwise amendments and regulatory rulings in later decades.

CRA was meant to encourage banks to make loans to high-risk borrowers, often minorities living in unstable neighborhoods. That has provided an opening to radical groups like ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) to abuse the law by forcing banks to make hundreds of millions of dollars in “subprime” loans to often uncreditworthy poor and minority customers.

Any bank that wants to expand or merge with another has to show it has complied with CRA – and approval can be held up by complaints filed by groups like ACORN.

In fact, intimidation tactics, public charges of racism and threats to use CRA to block business expansion have enabled ACORN to extract hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and contributions from America’s financial institutions.

Banks already overexposed by these shaky loans were pushed still further in the wrong direction when government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac began buying up their bad loans and offering them for sale on world markets.

Fannie and Freddie acted in response to Clinton administration pressure to boost homeownership rates among minorities and the poor. However compassionate the motive, the result of this systematic disregard for normal credit standards has been financial disaster.

ONE key pioneer of ACORN’s subprime-loan shakedown racket was Madeline Talbott – an activist with extensive ties to Barack Obama. She was also in on the ground floor of the disastrous turn in Fannie Mae’s mortgage policies. …

And now, the most famous “community organizer” in our time is set to ascend to the throne and wreak further havoc on our economy.  May God have mercy on us.

September 22, 2008

MSM caught attributing racist comments to white voter

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, media bias, shameful — crushliberalism @ 12:52 pm

Is Jayson Blair now working for the St. Pete Times?  From Digital Journal:

A quote attributed to Sandra Cichon, a private citizen, is spreading across the internet as a living example of White Racism. Did a reporter put words in this woman’s mouth?

An article in the St. Petersberg Times, quotes Cichon as having said, “I can’t imagine having a black president . . .”

In a phone interview Saturday, Sandra Cichon of Spring Hill, Florida denied that she ever spoke with any pollster or reporter concerning Obama or about anything regarding race. Cichon was taken by surprise when phoned by this reporter, and she was not aware that she had been quoted in any newspaper.

The article does mention that Cichon was interviewed by a reporter at the polls in August during local county commission races.  If I didn’t know any better, I’d swear the St. Pete Times just pulled a name out of their nether regions for their “article” and didn’t expect to get called on it.

The editor’s response?  Predictable.

In a phone call to Times Political Editor, Adam Smith, who authored the article in question, Smith said that he had the utmost confidence in the reporter, John Frank. Smith said that Frank was the reporter who actually spoke with Cichon. Smith said it is understandable that Cichon wouldn’t want to admit over the phone to making that statement, but “polls all over are showing that people are not hesitant in stating that they won’t vote for a black person.”

Oh, I see: Cichon is too embarrassed to admit her bigotry over the telephone, but she had no reservations about popping off a racist remark to a reporter in person, face to face?  Yeah, OK.  Sure.  Whatevs.

Nope…no liberal media bias!

September 17, 2008

Rehashing old (and thus far, failed) meme

Filed under: Obama, bigotry — crushliberalism @ 11:42 am

If you oppose the Obamessiah’s benediction election this November, it isn’t because of his Marxist view of economics; his anemic track record; his shameful devaluing of human life and his support for infanticide; his sexist streak; his defeatist mindset in the war on terrorism; etc.

Nope…it’s only because you’re racist.  No thoughts necessary, no pesky debates about policies, nothing like that at all is needed.  Just toss out a “you’re racist” and hope to shame people into voting for the schmuck.  Two new people are trying that approach:  Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (way to endear yourselves to the folks in your red state who are roundly rejecting The One, Kathy) and CNN’s resident moonbat Jack Cafferty.

Say, how’s that approach been working so far?  Not very well, from what I can tell.

Exit question: Isn’t it racist for the 90+% of blacks to vote for Obambi because he is black?

September 16, 2008

Race-baiting moonbat prof/columnist: Sarah Palin MIGHT be racist…possibly…don’t really know for sure

Filed under: Palin, bigotry, moonbats — crushliberalism @ 9:28 am

A college professor/MSM columnist writes a hit piece on Gov. Palin…color me surprised.  However, the line of attack is based on a “guilt by collective association” point of view.  You know, the same point of view that, when applied to “protected” politically correct groups, would be branded as racist?

The link to the column is here, but to summarize:

Sarah Palin grew up in Idaho, which is where Ruby Ridge is, which is where white separatist tax evader Randy Weaver was from, and which is where Aryan Nation bases its headquarters; and Idaho borders Montana, which is where various anti-government nutjobs like the Unabomber and Freemen and Montana Militia were from; and she lives in Alaska, which doesn’t have that many black or Hispanic folks living there; ergo, Palin was exposed to an entire culture of white supremacy wingnuttery.  She can’t avoid being a white power nutbar.

What if I used the same line of thinking?  You know, I’m from Memphis; and Memphis is predominantly black; and crime is high there; therefore, I’m certain to pimp some ho’s, sling some crack, steal some hubcaps, and pop a cap in someone’s #ss sometime in the near future.  Suffice it to say, such a conclusion would be deemed to be both ridiculous and racist.

Oh, sure, the good professor throws us a bone towards the end of her drivel:

There is no evidence that Palin was ever affiliated with white-supremacist groups during her years in Idaho or at home in Alaska. On the other hand, the beliefs of ultraconservative, evangelical churches like her family’s come dangerously close to those of the Christian Identity movement of those years. Likewise, Palin’s husband was a member of a political party whose members favored secession for Alaska, suggesting an affiliation with radical antistatism.

Perhaps somewhere on the record, Palin has publicly condemned the radical politics of her region. But it is hard to know where she stands on issues of race, equality and diversity. Thus it is high time to review the cultural ideals and models of the radical rurals from the Great White Northwest and find out for sure where Gov. Palin stands.

Ace retorts much better than I could:

If only we could find out if say, and I’m just spitballing here, if Obama had any connection to radical racists, perhaps even one connected to a church of some sort. And as for ‘radial antistatism’, do you suppose Obama ever knew anyone who, and again I’m just thinking out loud here, wanted to overthrow the US government by force?

Of course, questions must be asked, even if there’s no actual evidence. Of Palin naturally. You see if there was actual evidence in Obama’s case, the MSM wouldn’t ask questions, they’d have to work hard to hide that evidence. How hard would they have to work? As hard as if Elizabeth Edwards’ feelings were depending on it.

Somewhere, a village is missing its idiot.  The village can find her indoctrinating college kids in Connecticut.

August 26, 2008

Dems’ identity politics finally bites them in the posterior

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, feminism — crushliberalism @ 1:05 pm

From Neal Boortz:

Attempts to unite the Democrat Party (a big theme here in Denver) have been put on hold while the media figures out what to make of this “Uncle Tom” moment. What happened was that a black Barack Obama delegate apparently called a black Hillary Clinton supporter an “Uncle Tom.”

The conversation took place Saturday night in a hotel lobby in Denver. Delmarie Cobb of Chicago says that Illinois Senate President Emil Jones called her the slur for supporting Hillary Clinton. Jones initially denied calling Cobb an “Uncle Tom” but then tried telling reporters that he called her a “doubting Thomas” and Cobb misheard the comment.

Now the Illinois’ Nation Organization for Women is calling on Jones to resign immediately from the Illinois state Senate for the comment.

If you read the history of The Chosen One’s rise in the Chicago political machine you’ll see the name of Emil Jones everywhere. He’s a old-style Chicago politician who was instrumental in Barack’s political success. The media used to excoriate the Chicago political machine, but no more … not now that the machine’s greatest political success is the Democrat nominee.

Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton is trying to restore party unity … again, one of the themes for the week (besides John McCain’s houses). Members of the Congressional Black Caucus say that Hillary plans to release her pledged delegates to Obama, which “would help Democrats present a unified face to the nation after a primary marked by calls of racism and sexism.” The move is officially expected to happen on Wednesday.

When your party exists to foment identity victimhood, there will inevitably be moments like this.  Serves those jerks right.

August 25, 2008

Left’s spin: Biden’s racism an “asset”

Filed under: Biden, bigotry, hypocrisy, media bias, shameful — crushliberalism @ 12:28 pm

The left and the MSM (pardon the redundancy) are already in spin cycle mode over the selection of Greasy Joe Biden to The One’s campaign.  From Ace:

There is spin, and then there is spin: a CNBC/NYT reporter claims that Joe Biden’s occasional bursts of old-school dumb-but-not-hateful racism are actually “refreshing” and “an asset.”

Need I remind anyone that for months the left has been DaVinci Codebreaking every John McCain advertisement for so-called “coded racism.” And they were not praising such “coded racism” as “refreshing” or charming in the least.

Rather the opposite.

But when Joe Biden is genuinely, pleasantly surprised that an African-American manages to wash himself on occasion, it’s a good thing! It just shows, I guess, that he’s “relatable” to all those Racist Older White voters. I guess the idea is that Joe Biden can make the case, “Hey, I’m as surprised as you all are to be running with a darkie. But I have to tell you — he’s one of the ‘good ones,’ like Cosby or Byron Allen. He’s like the new, family-friendly Ice Cube, not the old, angry Ice Cube that your daughter would date to get back at you for not buying her that Mini Cooper she wanted.”

Brilliant.

There’s more, and it’s all good stuff.  I know, I know…that’s two from Ace today.  Sorry, but the guy nails it, plus he’s funny as heck…deal with it.  :)

August 23, 2008

Salon: Obama loss could only be due to racism

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, media bias, shameful — crushliberalism @ 10:07 am

You can read this guy’s leftist pap if you want to here, but he undermines his own argument at the very end with this:

You may or may not agree with Obama’s policy prescriptions, but they are, by and large, serious attempts to deal with the biggest issues we face: a failing health care system, oil dependency, income stagnation, and climate change.

Read that bold text again.  The buttmunch is making the right’s argument for us: we disagree with his policies (at least, the policies we know about that he hasn’t flip-flopped on or lied about)!  Isn’t that the main reason to reject a political candidate?

Sure, there are a variety of reasons not to vote for a guy: shady character, mental defects, poor judgment, etc.  But by and large, we vote for someone because of his/her policies, and/or we vote against someone for the same reason.  This schmuck seems to think that we should vote for guy just because he has some ideas that he thinks will solve “the biggest issues”, but if we think the proposed solutions would make the problems worse, then do we not have an obligation to vote accordingly?  According to this dork, apparently not.

Friends, we’ve always known that the left is morally and intellectually bankrupt.  Attempts like this to shame the electorate to vote for the wrong guy so as not to appear “racist” are evidence of said bankruptcy.  The Obamessiah must be in real trouble if the left is resorting to “please vote for him, or you’re a bigot!”  Sorry, but that crap doesn’t work on me, nor on most of normal America.

August 17, 2008

Howard Dean: GOP is “white party”

Filed under: Howard Dean, bigotry, hypocrisy — crushliberalism @ 9:09 pm

Stones and glass houses and stuff, Howie.  I’m thinking of a term from Psych 101 class: projection.

August 6, 2008

“25 Reasons You May be a Racist”

Filed under: Obama, bigotry — crushliberalism @ 8:49 pm

In the mold of Jeff Foxworthy, I give you The Corner.  A few of my favorites:

The tendency of Obama supporters to see racist impulses behind every criticism of their candidate has  evolved into absurdity. Now even the first  black president feels compelled to declare he’s not a racist. By this measure, nearly every American is at risk of being branded a racist at some point in the campaign. To assess whether you’re at risk just consult the list below ( apologies to Jeff Foxworthy ):
1.If you think Obama’s the most liberal member of the senate you…may be a racist.
 
2.If you object to Obama raising your payroll, capital gains and estate taxes you…may be a racist.


13. If you think the surge is working and that’s a good thing you…may be a racist.

17. If you’re appalled that Obama voted against  treating infants born after an abortion attempt  the same medically  as other infants born alive you…may be a racist.

18. If you were proud of your country even before Obama’s candidacy you…may be a racist.

24. If you don’t want the president to meet without precondition with the leaders of state sponsors of terror you…may be a racist.
 
25. If you don’t care how Hollywood or the European elite think you should vote you…may be a racist.

Heh.  Read the whole list.

New code word for racism: “skinny”

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, shameful — crushliberalism @ 10:34 am

Observing The One as being a skinny man apparently makes a person “racist”, English be damned.  From Slate:

When white people are invited to think about Obama’s physical appearance, the principal attribute they’re likely to dwell on is his dark skin. Consequently, any reference to Obama’s other physical attributes can’t help coming off as a coy walk around the barn. The sad fact is that any discussion of Obama’s physical appearance is going to remind white people of the physical characteristic that’s most on their minds.

So by observing that the Obamessiah is thin or that he has big ears, I am a racist?  Got it.  Thanks for the clarification.

Exit question: By logical extension, am I racist for noticing that Nicole Richie, Paris Hilton, and Twiggie are a little on the “über-slender” side?

Exit question #2: Is there anything that can’t be made into a race issue?

August 4, 2008

Point to ponder: Obama and white women

Filed under: Obama, bigotry, humor, hypocrisy — crushliberalism @ 2:23 pm

If, as the NYT and the rest of the Obama sycophants out there assert, it is racist to associate The One with white women Paris Hilton and Britney Spears, then will someone please instruct the Obama campaign to stop running racist smear ads against their own candidate?

August 2, 2008

Obama: OK, I admit I was race-baiting

Filed under: McCain, Obama, bigotry, hypocrisy, shameful — crushliberalism @ 4:23 pm

Despite his handlers’ assertions to the contrary (as well as those of his sycophants at the NYT), the Obamaliar finally fessed up that he, in fact, playing the race card.  But hey, just because he says that McCain is going to try and make people fear The One because he’s black doesn’t mean that he thinks McCain is a racist, right?

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.